to EOS Electronic Supplementto AGU Home Volume 82, No. 43, October 23, 2001


Global Ice and Land Climate Studies Using Scatterometer Image Data


David G. Long, Brigham Young University, Provo Utah, USA; Mark R. Drinkwater, European Space Agency, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands; Benjamin Holt and Sasan Saatchi, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif, USA; and Cheryl Bertoia, U.S. National Ice Center, Washington, D.C., USA


Copyright 2001 American Geophysical Union


Spaceborne scatterometers have provided continuous synoptic microwave coverage of the Earth for nearly a decade. Though these scatterometers were originally designed to measure oceanic surface winds, their data are also extremely useful in a broad range of ice and land applications, including the use of extensive scatterometer time series to determine seasonal and interannual variability and possible relationships to climate change. Under a NASA Earth Science Enterprise grant, the Scatterometer Climate Record Pathfinder (SCP) project has produced non-ocean scatterometer imagery and data products that are now publicly available for the first time (http://www.scp.byu.edu/). To date, four spaceborne scatterometers have flown on five different spacecraft (Table 1). The SCP project is providing imagery from the three NASA scatterometers in both a unique, enhanced resolution format and an intrinsic resolution format. In addition, new value-added data products from ESCAT are also available.

Table 1. Characteristics of four spaceborne scatterometers flown on Seasat (SASS), ERS-1/2 (ESCAT), ADEOS (NSCAT), and QuikSCAT (SeaWinds or QSCAT).

 

A scatterometer transmits radar pulses and receives backscattered energy, the intensity of which depends on the roughness and dielectric properties of a particular target. For ice, snow, soil, and vegetation, roughness properties and geometry that affect backscatter include surface roughness, moisture content, leaf size and density, branch orientation, and preferential alignment of surface scatterers. Dielectric properties are affected by physical characteristics of the effective scattering medium or layer—for example, snow grain size, brine concentration in sea ice, and canopy leaf density—as well as by the phase state of water (meltwater on sea ice and land ice, re-frozen percolated melt water in glacial ice, and whether trees are frozen or actively respiring). As scatterometers can be very accurately calibrated to generally to less than a few tenths of a decibel (dB), seasonal and interannual differences that result in changes as low as 1-2 dB may be confidently examined.

The various scatterometer configurations provide additional means for surface discrimination (Table 1). These include the use of different sensor frequencies to isolate surface types, the relative backscatter response between two polarizations (for example, to separate sea ice from open water), the varying backscatter gradient of different surfaces over a range of incidence angles, and the azimuthal response for features with preferred orientations. In general, the sensitivity to surface roughness increases with higher frequencies. The wide swath of scatterometers provides near-daily global coverage, particularly in the polar regions, at intrinsic resolutions generally between 25-50 km, over incidence angles ranging from 20-55o. We note the general trend toward finer resolution with newer sensors.

The European Space Agency’s scatterometer, ESCAT, provides the longest scatterometer record. As such, it is invaluable for climate-related investigations. However, due to recent spacecraft attitude and orbital control problems, ESCAT data have been unavailable since January 17, 2001. It is expected that future planned corrections to the ERS-2 spacecraft control will eventually enable continued ESCAT operations later this year. The use of ESCAT in conjunction with the different frequencies of the NASA scatterometer (NSCAT) and QuikSCAT (QSCAT) provides improved discrimination of scattering surfaces, and hence, better understanding. The Seasat-A scatterometer system (SASS), from 1978 data, provides a unique, albeit brief, historical data set that can be compared with the remaining scatterometers to study decadal changes. A recent special issue on scatterometer applications includes 10 papers on ice and land studies, nearly all of which examine long-term variability and the possible relationship to climate change [Drinkwater and Lin, 2000: hereafter referred to as TGARS2000].

Polar Ice

Scatterometer polar imaging applications were first proposed using Seasat SASS followed by ERS wind scatterometer data and have been more recently summarized in the context of NSCAT [Long and Drinkwater, 1999]. The daily global coverage of the scatterometer in the polar regions and its ability to discriminate sea ice, ice sheets, and icebergs, despite the poor solar illumination and frequent cloud cover of the polar regions, make it an excellent instrument for large-scale systematic observations of polar ice (Figure 1a).







Fig. 1. a) This QSCAT image shows Antarctica and surrounding sea ice cover in July 1999. Iceberg B10A (50 km x 100 km) is identified in Drake Passage and eventually melted near South Georgia Island in March 2000. Iceberg B10 broke off Thwaites Glacier in 1992 and split into two in June 1995. The complicated backscatter over the continent is related to ice and snow characteristics, surface and subsurface topography, katabatic winds, and melt zones. The variations in sea-ice returns are due to the snow cover, thickness, and history of the ice since formation. b) The QSCAT ice product of the Barents and East Greenland Seas is shown for April 5, 2001. Overlaid in red is the 100% ice concentration line derived from QSCAT and the southern limit of all known ice line, produced through analysis of visible, infrared, and SAR data by the NIC. c) A prototype product shows the NIC’s analyzed ice edge (green is 100 % ice concentration), QSCAT-derived ice edge (light blue), and ocean surface wind vectors from April 5, 2001. The wind vectors are used to forecast expected ice edge movement over a 24-hour period (cyan).

Ice Sheet Applications. Studies of the great ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica take advantage of the sensitivity of backscatter to the density and size of snow grains in the various ice facies, especially in the percolation zone and during summer melt. This approach provides a means of examining long-term variability over the ice sheets, particularly with ESCAT, including the extent of the seasonal snow melt zone over Greenland and Antarctica (see articles by Wismann on Greenland and Bingham and Drinkwater in TGARS2000). Estimates of the changes in accumulation rates over ice sheets have been made over Greenland [Drinkwater et al., 2001] from combined scatterometer data from multiple sensors. Finally, the azimuthal modulation that is obtained by the suite of scatterometer antennas designed to derive wind direction was found to correlate with directional snow surface features that align with Antarctic katabatic winds (see article by Long and Drinkwater in TGARS2000).

Sea Ice Applications. Over sea ice, the scatterometer is sensitive to roughness and physical properties that vary by ice type and season. Sea ice extent is readily identified with data from ESCAT [Gohin and Cavanié, 1995] and with data from NSCAT and QSCAT (Figure 1) [e.g., Remund and Long, 1999]. NOAA NESDIS uses polarization differences to separate ice and ocean from QSCAT image products for near real-time products (see http://www.natice.noaa.gov/science/products/qs.html). The National Ice Center (NIC) uses the NESDIS QSCAT ice products in their global ice mapping process, where data from visible, infrared, and passive and active microwave sensors are combined in a manual data assimilation process to produce weekly global sea ice charts [Bertoia et al., 1998]. Initial work with these data show that the QSCAT ice product reliably maps the higher concentrations of the Arctic ice pack, though it less accurately depicts the lighter ice concentrations usually found in the marginal ice zone (Figure 1b). The NIC also expects to attain improved ice forecasting by using QSCAT's accurate depiction of surface winds near the ice edge (Figure 1c). This integrated set of measurements (ice edge and winds) may also be useful for examining turbulent heat fluxes within the marginal ice zones. Arctic field validation of QSCAT sea ice and surface winds will be obtained during an October 2001 Barents Sea cruise. Preliminary Antarctic field validation of early operational test data products was performed in 1999-2000.

The onset of seasonal snow melt and freeze-up provides a significant contrast to winter, when conditions over sea ice in the polar regions are colder. Melt onset defines a significant transition in the radiative budget of the ice-covered region, while autumn freeze-up is a key period during which the residual fraction and characteristics of perennial sea ice can be assessed and preconditioning for winter sea ice dynamics is established via the distribution and orientation of newly forming ice in leads. Most recently, algorithmic approaches using scatterometer data to determine melt onset and freeze-up have been examined, including in the Antarctic over a several year period (see article by Drinkwater and Liu in TGARS2000).

Additional studies of sea ice include the derivation of ice velocity fields and ice-type classification. Ice velocity fields are important for estimating heat flux between the ocean and atmosphere, as well as the sea ice mass balance through estimates of ice deformation and growth. Motion fields have been derived using scatterometer data with algorithms based on wavelet analysis [Liu et al., 1999] and cross-correlation with feature tracking [Long and Drinkwater, 1999]. The determination of ice type is another means of estimating mass balance, in addition to being important for navigation. Several recent ice type studies have been undertaken that often use combined data from one or more scatterometers and other sensors to isolate scattering mechanisms for different ice types, and thereby improve discrimination [e.g.,. Kwok et al., 1999; see article by Remund et al. in TGARS2000].

Iceberg Tracking. Operationally, the National Ice Center uses QSCAT imagery as a primary source for tracking large icebergs in the Southern Ocean. For example, in 1999, iceberg B-10A—which was 38 km x 77 km in diameter—drifted north out of the pack ice and into the shipping lanes of the Drake Passage (Figure 1a). QSCAT was used to track this iceberg from July 1999 until its deterioration in March 2000.

Terrestrial Biosphere Applications

Scatterometer data have also been applied to land studies, making use primarily of changes related to moisture content over both vegetated and bare soil, as well as the seasonal freeze-thaw cycle. Several studies have used the extensive ESCAT time series to examine the derivation of monthly indexes of soil moisture over western Africa (see article by Wagner and Scipal in TGARS2000), seasonal trends in soil moisture content in Spain (see article by Woodhouse and Hoekman in TGARS2000), and the seasonal variability of backscatter over different types of vegetation and land surface covers (see articles by Abdel-Messeh and Quegan, and Frison et al. in TGARS2000). Other studies have used scatterometer data to examine the freeze-thaw cycle of boreal forests [Kimball et al., 2001; see article by Wismann on Siberia in TGARS2000].

Scatterometer data can provide valuable information about the seasonality of vegetation in regional-to-continental-scale studies of ecological processes. In particular, in tropical grassland and woodland savanna, the scatterometer signal is influenced by the loss of vegetation due to seasonal anthropogenic fire and its recovery (refer to Figure 2 in Section News article). A combination of multi-temporal data from NSCAT and QSCAT at high frequency (14.0 and 13.4 GHz, respectively) and the ESCAT at lower frequency (5.3 GHz) has the potential for identifying the long-term climatic impacts on moisture availability and vegetation loss or recovery.

Available Ice and Land Data Products

The SCP provides two basic forms of gridded image products: 1) a calibrated browse backscatter image at the intrinsic sensor resolution (Table 1); and 2) a unique enhanced resolution image product, which combines multiple overlapping passes over intervals of a few days, or just one using an algorithm called Scatterometer Image Reconstruction (SIR) [Early and Long, 2001]. The resulting enhanced resolutions are about 25 km for ESCAT, 8-10 km for NSCAT and SASS, and either 8-10 km or 5-6 km for QSCAT. In addition, each enhanced image product is decomposed into two sub-images: 1) a backscatter image normalized to the mid-swath incidence angle of 40o (so-called A image); and 2) the gradient of backscatter over the range of incidence angles (so-called B image). The latter product is not produced for QSCAT because its conically scanning antenna operates at two fixed incidence angles.

These scatterometer image products (as well as ancillary products, documentation, software, movies, and extensive bibliography) are currently available through the SCP data site via file transfer protocol (ftp) (http://www.scp.byu.edu/). All processing is done at Brigham Young University’s (BYU) Microwave Earth Remote Sensing (MERS) Laboratory. Also, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s (JPL) Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center (PODAAC) currently has available browse imagery and raw data for QSCAT (http://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/quikscat/qscat_data.html). The ESCAT data products are provided by IFREMER-CERSAT to JPL and later transferred to BYU after pre-processing. Future additions to the SCP site include sea ice motion products derived from both NSCAT and QSCAT [Liu et al., 1999] and the capability to select and order large segments of data sets.

We hope that the release of these ice and land scatterometer products through the SCP data site will encourage researchers to use these valuable image data, particularly for climate-related studies. While ESCAT on ERS-2 is presently not collecting data, QSCAT remains fully functional, thus providing a continuation of the recent scatterometer data record that is now nearing a decade. Currently, two known scatterometers are planned for future missions. As a follow-on to QSCAT, NASA's SeaWinds will be flown on NASDA's ADEOS-II mission, which is currently scheduled for launch in early 2002. SeaWinds will essentially have the same configuration as QSCAT and has a mission design lifetime of 5 years. The ESCAT follow-on, ESA's Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), will be flown on the first of three METOP satellites and is scheduled for launch in 2005. Each METOP has a design lifetime of 5 years and thus, with overlap, the series has a planned duration of 14 years. ASCAT will be similar to ESCAT in configuration except it will have increased coverage, with two 500-km swaths (one on each side of the spacecraft nadir track). Thus, with scatterometers likely to continue for many years, the applications of scatterometer data for long time-scale ice and land applications will also continue and likely thrive.

Acknowledgments

The Scatterometer Climate Record Pathfinder task is supported by NASA's Office of Earth Science Enterprise through Research Announcement 99-OES-04. ESCAT data were provided by CERSAT-IFREMER as part of ESA Project AO2.USA.119. MRD completed this work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and subsequently at the European Space Agency. The JPL effort was supported by NASA through a contract with JPL, California Institute of Technology. The use of QuikScat data at the National Ice Center was facilitated by Paul Chang at NOAA's Office of Research and Applications and by the excellent work of scientific programmer Mike Chase. Figure 1c is provided courtesy of Son Nghiem, Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

References

Bertoia, C., J. Falkingham, and F. Fetterer, Polar SAR data for operational sea ice mapping, in Recent Advances in the Analysis of SAR Data of the Polar Oceans, edited by R. Kwok and C. Tsatsoulis, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 201-234, 1998.

Drinkwater, M. R., and C. C. Lin, Introduction to the special section on emerging scatterometer applications, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 38, 1763-1764, 2000.

Drinkwater, M. R., D. G. Long, and A. W. Bingham, Greenland snow accumulation estimates from scatterometer data, J. Geophys. Res., Atmos., PARCA Special Issue, in press, 2001.

Early, D. S., and D. G. Long, Image reconstruction and enhanced resolution imaging from irregular samples, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 39, 291-302, 2001.

Gohin, F., and A. Cavanié, A first try at identification of sea ice using the three beam scatterometer of ERS-1, Int. J. Remote Sens., 16, 2031-2054, 1995.

Kimball, J. S., K. C. McDonald, A. C. Keyser, S. Frolking, and S. W. Running, Application of the NASA scatterometer (NSCAT) for determining the daily frozen and nonfrozen landscape of Alaska, Remote Sens. Environ., 75, 113-126, 2001.

Kwok, R., G. F. Cunningham, and S. Yueh, Area balance of the Arctic Ocean perennial ice zone: October 1996 to April 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 25747-25759, 1999.

Liu, A., Y. Zhao, and S. Y. Wu, Arctic sea ice drift from wavelet analysis of NSCAT and SSM/I data, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 11529-11538, 1999.

Long, D. G., and M. R. Drinkwater, Cryosphere applications of NSCAT data, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 37, 1671-1684, 1999.

Remund, Q., and D. G. Long, Sea-ice extent mapping using Ku-band scatterometer data, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 11,515-11,527, 1999.



AGU