Public Affairs [PA]

PA13B
 MC:Hall D  Monday  1340h

Increasing the Societal Impact of Geophysics II Posters


Presiding:  R Snieder, Colorado School of Mines; L Pellerin, Green Engineering, Inc

PA13B-1342

Educating a Community Impacted by an Earthquake Swarm: 106 Volunteers Host Earthscope Flexible Array Recorders During the Mogul, Nevada Sequence

* Dhar, M S mahesh@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, MS0174 University of Nevada 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Thompson, M thompson@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, MS0174 University of Nevada 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Kell-Hills, A kell@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, MS0174 University of Nevada 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Louie, J N louie@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, MS0174 University of Nevada 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Smith, K D ken@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, MS0174 University of Nevada 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Tirabassi, J jtweez23@yahoo.com, Nevada Seismological Lab, MS0174 University of Nevada 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Tom, S sterlingrno@charter.net, Nevada Seismological Lab, MS0174 University of Nevada 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Irwin, T luv2pitch55@yahoo.com, Nevada Seismological Lab, MS0174 University of Nevada 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States

From February 28, 2008 residents of Reno and Sparks, Nevada experienced continuous earthquake shocks. On some days the number of shocks exceeded 100. The local-magnitude 4.7 earthquake on April 25 shook not only the Reno urban basin, but also people's patience. Intense and widespread public interest developed in the earthquakes and in seismology generally. The Nevada Seismological Laboratory (NSL) was able to conduct the Reno Basin Deployment to capitalize on this general interest. With the help of the NSF Earthscope Observatory and the PASSCAL Instrument Center at New Mexico Tech, the NSL was able to borrow ninety Flexible Array single-channel Ref Tek RT-125A recorders for this experiment. We carried out five deployments across Reno and Sparks from May 15 to July 15, 2008. In advance of the deployments, we asked for volunteer recorder hosts from among the public. About 200 people and institutions responded. Unfortunately, not all those who volunteered could be included in the deployments. Since the earthquake swarm was in the Mogul and Somersett neighborhoods, we conducted the deployments mostly in West Reno. The five deployments recorded at a total of 106 locations. There were 67 locations in the first deployment; the second, third, fourth, and fifth deployments were carried out using 60, 9, 15, and 11 locations respectively. Many of the locations were repeated between the different deployments. Each deployment recorded shaking on a vertical 4.5-Hz, leveled geophone for a four-day period. The results, primarily from a magnitude 3.1 event on May 31, show that the shaking intensity and duration varied clearly at different locations, even though the distances from the epicenter to those locations were about equal. Deep-basin sites recorded longer shaking durations than the shallow-basin and rock sites, and rock sites often produced waveforms of lesser amplitude. P-wave arrival times from the experiment will contribute critical tomographic data toward understanding the structure of the Reno basin. Without public awareness and participation, this experiment could not have been completed.

http://www.seismo.unr.edu

PA13B-1343

Linking International Development Actors to Geophysical Infrastructure: Exploring an IRIS Community Role in Bridging a Communications Gap

* Lerner-Lam, A lerner@ldeo.columbia.edu, Lamont-Doherty Earth Obs., 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, United States
Aster, R aster@dutchman.nmt.edu, New Mexico Inst. of Mining & Tech., Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sci. 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801, United States
Beck, S beck@geo.arizona.edu, Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of Geosciences Gould-Simpson Bldg. #77 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States
Ekstrom, G ekstrom@ldeo.columbia.edu, Lamont-Doherty Earth Obs., 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, United States
Fisher, K karen_fischer@brown.edu, Brown Univ., Dept. Geological Sci. PO Box 1846, Providence, RI 02912, United States
Meltzer, A ameltzer@lehigh.edu, Lehigh Univ., Coll. of Arts and Sciences 9 West Packer Ave., Bethlehem, PA 18015, United States
Nyblade, A andy@geosc.psu.edu, Pennsylvania State Univ., Dept. of Geosciences 503 Deike Bldg., University Park, PA 16802, United States
Sandvol, E sandvole@missouri.edu, Univ. of Missouri-Columbia, Dept. of Geological Sciences 101 Geology Bldg., Columbia, MO 65211, United States
Willemann, R ray@iris.edu, IRIS Consortium, 1200 New York Ave. NW, suite 800, Washington, DC 20005, United States

Over the past quarter century, national investments in high-fidelity digital seismograph networks have resulted in a global infrastructure for real-time in situ earthquake monitoring. Many network operators adhere to community-developed standards, with the result that there are few technical impediments to data sharing and real-time information exchange. Two unanswered questions, however, are whether the existing models of international collaboration will ensure the stability and sustainability of global earthquake monitoring, and whether the participating institutions can work with international development agencies and non- governmental organizations in meeting linked development and natural hazard risk reduction goals. Since the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, many of these actors are enlarging their commitments to natural hazard risk reduction and building national technical capacities, among broader programs in poverty alleviation and adaptation to environmental stress. Despite this renewed commitment, international development organizations, with notable exceptions, have been relatively passive in discussions of how the existing earthquake monitoring infrastructure could be leveraged to support risk-reduction programs and meet sustainable development goals. At the same time, the international seismological community – comprising universities and government seismological surveys – has built research and education initiatives such as EarthScope, AfricaArray, and similar programs in China, Europe and South America, that use innovative instrumentation technologies and deployment strategies to enable new science and applications, and promote education and training in critical sectors. Can these developments be combined? Recognizing this communication or knowledge gap, the IRIS International Working Group (IWG) explores the link between the activities of IRIS Members using IRIS facilities and the missions of international development agencies, such as US AID, the World Bank, other international development banks, and agencies of the United Nations. Interests of US seismologists are served by encouraging development of modern seismographic systems in countries around the world to collect data that are useful in research as well as hazard mitigation and other national interests. Activities of the IWG to date include communicating the benefits of geophysical infrastructure and training to disaster risk reduction programs within the United Nations and development banks, coordinating an initiative to leverage retired PASSCAL data loggers through long-term loans to network operators in foreign countries, preparing a white paper outlining IRIS capabilities relevant to international development, and conducting a workshop, "Out of Africa", on modernizing geophysical infrastructure in the Americas and Southeast Asia through projects that are closely tied to university education and academic research.

http://www.iris.edu/

PA13B-1344

Leveraging Educational, Research and Facility Expertise to Improve Global Seismic Monitoring: Preparing a Guide on Sustainable Networks

Nybade, A andy@geosc.psu.edu, Pennsylvania State Univ., Dept. of Geosciences 503 Deike Bldg., University Park, PA 16802, United States
Aster, R aster@dutchman.nmt.edu, New Mexico Inst. of Mining & Technology, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Science 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801, United States
Beck, S beck@geo.arizona.edu, Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of Geosciences Gould-Simpson Bldg. #77 1040 East 4th St., Tucson, AZ 85721, United States
Ekstrom, G ekstrom@ldeo.columbia.edu, Lamont-Doherty Earth Obs., 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, United States
Fischer, K karen_fischer@brown.edu, Brown Univ., Dept. Geological Sci. PO Box 1846, Providence, RI 02912, United States
Lerner-Lam, A lerner@ldeo.columbia.edu, Lamont-Doherty Earth Obs., 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, United States
Meltzer, A ameltzer@lehigh.edu, Lehigh Univ., Coll. of Arts and Sciences 9 West Packer Ave., Bethlehem, PA 18015, United States
Sandvol, E sandvole@missouri.edu, Univ. of Missouri-Columbia, Dept. of Geological Sciences 101 Geology Bldg., Columbia, MO 65211, United States
* Willemann, R J ray@iris.edu, IRIS Consortium, 1200 New York Ave. NW, suite 800, Washington, DC 20005, United States

Building a sustainable earthquake monitoring system requires well-informed cooperation between commercial companies that manufacture components or deliver complete systems and the government or other agencies that will be responsible for operating them. Many nations or regions with significant earthquake hazard lack the financial, technical, and human resources to establish and sustain permanent observatory networks required to return the data needed for hazard mitigation. Government agencies may not be well- informed about the short-term and long-term challenges of managing technologically advanced monitoring systems, much less the details of how they are built and operated. On the relatively compressed time scale of disaster recovery efforts, it can be difficult to find a reliable, disinterested source of information, without which government agencies may be dependent on partial information. If system delivery fails to include sufficient development of indigenous expertise, the performance of local and regional networks may decline quickly, and even data collected during an early high-performance period may be degraded or lost. Drawing on unsurpassed educational capabilities of its members working in close cooperation with its facility staff, IRIS is well prepared to contribute to sustainability through a wide variety of training and service activities that further promote standards for network installation, data exchange protocols, and free and open access to data. Members of the Consortium and staff of its Core Programs together could write a guide on decisions about network design, installation and operation. The intended primary audience would be government officials seeking to understand system requirements, the acquisition and installation process, and the expertise needed operate a system. The guide would cover network design, procurement, set-up, data use and archiving. Chapters could include advice on network data processing, archiving data (including information on the value of standards), installing and servicing stations, building a data processing and management center (including information on evaluating bids), using results from earthquake monitoring, and sustaining an earthquake monitoring system. Appendices might include profiles of well-configured and well- run networks and sample RFPs. Establishing permanent networks could provide a foundation for international research and educational collaborations and critical new data for imaging Earth structure while supporting scientific capacity building and strengthening hazard monitoring around the globe.

http://www.iris.edu

PA13B-1345

Model of the Tidal Variation in the Geoid and Deflection of Vertical in the Korean Peninsula

* Na, S sunghona@pusan.ac.kr, Pusan Nationa University, Jangjun-dong, Geumjung-gu, Pusan, 609-735, Korea, Republic of
Choi, K ksunchoi@pusan.ac.kr, Pusan Nationa University, Jangjun-dong, Geumjung-gu, Pusan, 609-735, Korea, Republic of
Moon, W wmoon@cc.umanitoba.ca, University of Manitoba, 125 Dysart rd., Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
Cho, J jojh@kasi.re.kr, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 61-1, Hwaam-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-348, Korea, Republic of
Shin, Y yhshin@kasi.re.kr, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 61-1, Hwaam-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-348, Korea, Republic of

Recently in Korea, there is growing scientific interest and technological need about the tidal variation of the geoid and deflection of vertical around the Korean peninsula. Due to the gavitational attraction by the moon and the sun, tidal oscillation exists both in soild earth and the sea. And the ocean tide loads the earth crust and cause the secondary deformation. Numerical modelling or numerical fitting is necessary for the ocean tide model. We are developing the local tidal perturbation model of Korea to predict those variation in the geoid and deflection of vertical.

PA13B-1346

Application of Global Real-Time Landslide Forecasting System for International use

* Kirschbaum, D B dbach@ldeo.columbia.edu, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, United States
Lerner-Lam, A lerner@ldeo.columbia.edu, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, United States
Hong, Y yanghong@ou.edu, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Norman, OK 20742, United States
Adler, R Robert.F.Adler@nasa.gov, ESSIC, University of Maryland College Park, 2207 Computer and Space Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742, United States

The variability of natural hazard events by category significantly vary in their spatial and temporal extents and onsets, requiring a catered, and focused approach to appropriately address the risk and vulnerability of the specific hazard event. The advent of satellite data products has helped to monitor tropical cyclones, droughts, and flooding conditions and consequent impacts. Geophysical events such as earthquake are continually monitored on a global seismic network. However, a warning or monitoring system has not been established at larger scales for landslides, a hazard with the smallest spatial extent but highest frequency and arguably largest impacts globally. One of the major challenges in landslide hazard research is the field's focus on site specific investigations, drawing on high resolution surface data as well as detailed landslide inventories and rainfall information to provide an estimate of static landslide hazard susceptibility. Few studies have approached the issue of landslide risk and susceptibility from a dynamic standpoint to estimate the potential for landslide susceptibility conditions in a time frame that allows for a better understanding of the physical processes both scientifically and as it relates to societal response. To present a more dynamic representation of landslide hazard risk at larger spatial scales new research has developed an algorithm which couples a landslide hazard susceptibility map with real-time satellite derived rainfall to forecast areas with high landslide potential at the global scale. The algorithm draws on near-real time Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) data as well as other satellite products to obtain a 3-hourly picture of locations across the world where the surface susceptibility conditions are high and the rainfall accumulation exceeds a defined threshold. The resulting forecasts are updated every 3 hours on a website, highlighting pixels satisfying these conditions on a 0.25º grid. The spatial and temporal distribution of vulnerable areas can then be mapped out by integrating population data, road networks, and socio-economic information. This work is underway at both the regional and global scales. This algorithm is in evaluation stages and requires revisions of the input parameters and rainfall information to improve the prototype and algorithm performance. Improvements needed for enhanced performance include increasing the resolution of the susceptibility map with a higher resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and discarding surface parameter data which increase uncertainty without contributing additional information such as the current soils information; additional quantification of the rainfall threshold relationship; and introduction of more dynamic variables like soil moisture which can improve the memory of the system. With the suggested modifications, this algorithm can serve as a useful tool for government officials, international aid organizations, and general societal education to better quantify landslide impacts and extent of hazard risk as well as more expediently respond to susceptible areas, particularly in more remote locations.

PA13B-1347

Comparison of Vs30 Measurements Against Predictions in Southern California

* Thomspon, M thompson@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, University Of Nevada MS 0174, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Dhar, M S mahesh@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, University Of Nevada MS 0174, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Pancha, A pancha@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, University Of Nevada MS 0174, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Louie, J N louie@seismo.unr.edu, Nevada Seismological Lab, University Of Nevada MS 0174, Reno, NV 89557, United States
Yong, A yong@usgs.gov, US Geological Survey, 525 S. Wilson Ave., Pasadena, CA 91106, United States
Pullammanappallil, S satish@optimsoftware.com, Optim, 200 S. Virgina St., Reno, NV 89501, United States

We have measured shallow shear-wave velocity at close vicinity to eighty-three California Integrated Seismic Network recording sites and at 188 sites along the San Gabriel River in southern California (Thelen et al., 2006), using SeisOpt® ReMiTM (© 2007 Optim). Data for CISN stations were collected usually within 100 meters of the instrument to better understand the shallow shear-velocity structure. Average shear wave velocities (Vs) have been determined to 10-, 30-, 50-, and 100-meter depths; as well, modeled velocity constraints often extended to more than 200 m when possible. The depths at which the measured shear wave velocity reaches ±20% of the values of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 km/s were computed; the Z0.5, Z1.0, and Z1.5 respectively. These interface depths (ZV) are estimated due to their importance in geotechnical calculations of resonant frequency. Topographic-slope estimates for Vs30 do not address interface depths. To examine subsets of the data set, we defined "basin" sites as those for which the SCEC CVM v4 predicts a Vs30 of <800 m/s. We find strong correlation at basin sites between our measured Vs30 values and the SCEC CVM Vs30 predictions, but no correlation at rock sites (as defined by the SCEC CVM). We also find that the Wald and Allen (2007) predictions of Vs30 using topographic slope are in agreement with our measured values at 57% of the sites, after allowing for a ±20% prediction error. As we expect, the standard deviation of the measured values is greater than for the predicted values (174 and 134 m/s respectively), reflecting the heterogeneity between the sites. For 270 sites we measured across southern California, the topographic prediction for Vs30 has a mode that is 20% less than the measured Vs30. This consistent bias in the Wald and Allen (2007) prediction remains even if we select the 113 measurements that are within the flattest part of the Los Angeles Basin.

http://www.seismo.unr.edu/hazsurv

PA13B-1348

Understanding socio-economic impacts of geohazards aided by cyber-enabled systems

* Klose, C D ck2204@columbia.edu, Columbia University, School of Applied Science and Engineering 351 Mudd Building, New York, NY 10027, United States
Webersik, C webersik@ias.unu.edu, United Nations University, United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS) 6F, International Organizations Center, Yokohama, 220-8502, Japan

Due to an increase in the volume of geohazards worldwide, not only are impoverished regions in less developed countries such as Haiti, vulnerable to risk but also low income regions in industrialized countries, e.g. USA, as well. This has been exemplified once again by Hurricanes Gustav, Hanna and Ike and the impact on the Caribbean countries during the summer of 2008. To date, extensive research has been conducted to improve the monitoring of human-nature coupled systems. However, there is little emphasis on improving and developing methodologies to a) interpret multi-dimensional and complex data and b) validate prediction and modeling results. This presentation tries to motivate more research initiatives to address the aforementioned issues, bringing together two academic disciplines, earth and social sciences, to research the relationship between natural and socio-economic processes. Results are presented where cyber-enabled methods based on artificial intelligence are applied to different geohazards and regions in the world. They include 1) modeling of public health risks associated with volcanic gas hazards, 2) prediction and validation of potential areas of mining-triggered earthquakes, and 3) modeling of socio-economic risks associated with tropical storms in Haiti and the Dominican Republic.