SPA-Aeronomy [SA]

SA51A
 MC:Hall D  Friday  0800h

Space Weather: Operational Models and Product Development and Use II Posters


Presiding:  S Quigley, Air Force Research Laboratory; S T Lai, Air Force Research Laboratory

SA51A-1527 INVITED

Operational Space Weather Products at IPS

* Neudegg, D dave.n@ips.gov.au, IPS Radio and Space Services, PO Box 1386 Haymarket, Sydney, NSW 1240, Australia
Steward, G , IPS Radio and Space Services, PO Box 1386 Haymarket, Sydney, NSW 1240, Australia
Marshall, R , IPS Radio and Space Services, PO Box 1386 Haymarket, Sydney, NSW 1240, Australia
Terkildsen, M , IPS Radio and Space Services, PO Box 1386 Haymarket, Sydney, NSW 1240, Australia
Kennewell, J , Australian Space Academy, PO Box 3 Meckering, Meckering, WA 6405, Australia
Patterson, G , IPS Radio and Space Services, PO Box 1386 Haymarket, Sydney, NSW 1240, Australia
Panwar, R , IPS Radio and Space Services, PO Box 1386 Haymarket, Sydney, NSW 1240, Australia

IPS Radio and Space Services operates an extensive network (IPSNET) of monitoring stations and observatories within the Australasian and Antarctic regions to gather information on the space environment. This includes ionosondes, magnetometers, GPS-ISM, oblique HF sounding, riometers, and solar radio and optical telescopes. IPS exchanges this information with similar organisations world-wide. The Regional Warning Centre (RWC) is the Australian Space Forecast Centre (ASFC) and it utilizes this data to provide products and services to support customer operations. A wide range of customers use IPS services including; defence force and emergency services using HF radio communications and surveillance systems, organisations involved in geophysical exploration and pipeline cathodic protection, GPS users in aviation. Subscriptions to the alerts, warnings, forecasts and reports regarding the solar, geophysical and ionospheric conditions are distributed by email and Special Message Service (SMS). IPS also develops and markets widely used PC software prediction tools for HF radio skywave and surface wave (ASAPS/GWPS) and provides consultancy services for system planning.

http://www.ips.gov.au

SA51A-1528

Developing a space weather forecast capability for the Air Force Research Laboratory

* Young, S L Shawn.Young.2@us.af.mil, Air Force Research Laboratory, AFRL/RVBXR Bldg 464, Rm 404 3550 Aberdeen Ave SE, Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5776, United States

AFRL's Space Weather Forecasting Laboratory has begun a long term effort to create an integrated space weather forecasting capability based on leading space environment models. Our initial efforts will be focused on assembling and validating a baseline comprised of current operational and otherwise established models. Component models will be upgraded as we validate and learn to use more advanced models. Our long term goal is a suite of models, coupled or otherwise, that are data assimilative where appropriate and have ensemble forecast capability. I will outline our strategy and report on our progress.

SA51A-1529

AFWA's Space Weather Modeling System: A Flexible Space Weather Forecast System

* Fry, C D gfry@expi.com, Exploration Physics International, Inc., 6275 University Drive NW, Suite 37-105, Huntsville, AL 35806, United States
Eccles, J vince@spacenv.com, Space environment Corporation, Suite A 221 N. Spring Creek Parkway, Providence, UT 84332, United States
Reich, J P Joseph.Reich@offutt.af.mil, Air Force Weather Agency, 101 Nelson Drive, Offutt AFB, NE 68113, United States
Berman, L M BermanL@offutt.af.mil, Air Force Weather Agency, 101 Nelson Drive, Offutt AFB, NE 68113, United States
Sattler, M P SattlerM@offutt.af.mil, Air Force Weather Agency, 101 Nelson Drive, Offutt AFB, NE 68113, United States

A key requirement of models used for space weather forecasting is making them flexible enough to exploit new computational capabilities as technology advances. This flexibility occurs when models are made scalable and portable while maintaining their existing capabilities and accuracy. Scalability allows the models to run faster as more processors are added. Portability enables the models to run on a variety of computing platforms. This makes operational procurement decisions more flexible and cost-effective. The Battlespace Environments Institute (BEI) project supports the coupling of Earth system environment models, such as oceans and atmospheres together, under the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF). The project mandates scalability and portability of the coupled models to adapt readily to changing computational environments. The Space Weather Modeling System (SWMS) is a BEI model of solar-terrestrial space weather. The Hakamada-Akasofu-Fry version 2 (HAFv2) solar wind model and the Ionospheric Forecast Model (IFM) are the first two coupled components in SWMS. The HAFv2 model produces quantitative forecasts of solar wind parameters at Earth and elsewhere in the inner heliosphere. The IFM is the physics-based ionosphere model of Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements (GAIM) data-assimilation model. IFM provides highly representative specifications of plasma conditions in the global ionosphere. Coupling these two models together in the SWMS enables multi-day forecasts of solar wind and ionospheric disturbances. SWMS is an example of a successful transition of research to operations that is flexible while maintaining accuracy. This capability is crucial to DoD because it provides their warfighters with the actionable space weather forecasts that they need to make operational decisions. We present the solar wind and ionospheric results of the SWMS model for the large solar storm of April 6-7, 2000 with comparisons to solar wind and ionospheric data.

SA51A-1530

Improvements in the Space Weather Modeling Framework

* Ridley, A J ridley@umich.edu, Center for Space Environment Modeling, Space Research Building University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, United States
Liemohn, M liemohn@umich.edu, Center for Space Environment Modeling, Space Research Building University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, United States
DeZeeuw, D darrens@umich.edu, Center for Space Environment Modeling, Space Research Building University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, United States
Ilie, R rilie@umich.edu, Center for Space Environment Modeling, Space Research Building University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, United States
Sokolov, I igorsok@umich.edu, Center for Space Environment Modeling, Space Research Building University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, United States
Toth, G gtoth@umich.edu, Center for Space Environment Modeling, Space Research Building University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, United States
Yu, Y yiqunyu@umich.edu, Center for Space Environment Modeling, Space Research Building University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, United States

The magnetosphere within the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) has been represented by a global magnetosphere model (BATSRUS), an inner magnetosphere model (the Rice Convection Model) and a model of the ionospheric electrodynamics. We present significant improvements in the SWMF: (1) We have implemented a spherical grid within BATSRUS and have utilized this for modeling the magnetosphere; (2) We have significantly improved the physics of the auroral oval within the ionospheric electrodynamics code, modeling a self-consistent diffuse and discrete auroral oval; (3) We utilize the multifluid MHD code within BATSRUS to allow for more accurate specification and differentiation of the density within the magnetosphere; and (4) we have incorporated the Hot Electron and Ion Drift Integrator (HEIDI) ring current code within the SWMF. We will present these improvements and show the quantitative differences within the model results when comparing to a suite of measurements for a number of different intervals.

SA51A-1531

Research to Operations: Maintaining US Space Weather Capability after DMSP

* Gentile, L C, Boston College Institute for Scientific Research, 402 St. Clement's Hall 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467-3862, United States
Burke, W J, Air Force Research Laboratory Space Vehicles Directorate, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-3010, United States
Burke, W J, Boston College Institute for Scientific Research, 402 St. Clement's Hall 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467-3862, United States
de La Beaujardiere, O , Air Force Research Laboratory Space Vehicles Directorate, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-3010, United States
Huang, C Y, Air Force Research Laboratory Space Vehicles Directorate, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-3010, United States
Wilson, G R, Air Force Research Laboratory Space Vehicles Directorate, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-3010, United States
Rich, F J, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory, 244 Wood Street, Lexington, MA 02420, United States

The first Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) spacecraft was launched in 1972; the last is scheduled to fly in 2012. Presently, there is no replacement for the space weather monitoring instruments that fly on DMSP. These sensors have provided extensive, long-term data sets that constitute a critical component of the US space weather capabilities. The US Air Force is currently considering options for new space weather missions. Evolving operational needs and recent research accomplishments justify continued collection of space environmental data. Examples include measurements to: (1) monitor in real time the Dst index that will drive next-generation satellite drag models; (2) calibrate electromagnetic energy flux from the magnetosphere into the ionosphere and thermosphere that heats neutrals and drives winds that degrade precise orbit determinations (3) determine strengths of electric fields at high and low latitudes during the main phase of magnetic storms that lead to severe blackouts and spacecraft anomalies (4) characterize plasma density irregularities, equatorial plasma bubbles, and Appleton anomaly variability to improve reliability of transionospheric communication and surveillance links; (5) characterize particle flux responsible for auroral clutter and radar degradation; (6) map regions of L-Band scintillation for robust GPS applications; and (7) update the World Magnetic Field Model to maintain superiority in guidance systems. These examples illustrate the need for continued space environment awareness. Comprehensive assessments of both operational requirements and research advances are needed to inform selections of sensors and spacecraft that will define future operational capabilities.

SA51A-1532

Forecasting Frontiers Part I: Solar Drivers of Space Weather Observations

* Johnston, J C janet.johnston@hanscom.af.mil, Air Force Research Laboratory, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731,
Balasubramaniam, K S balaks@kirtland.af.mil, Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate, Sunspot, NM 88349,
Fry, C D gfry@expi.com, Exploration Physics International, Inc., 6275 University Dr. NW, Suite 37-105, Huntsville, AL 35806-1776,
Kuchar, T A thomas.kuchar.ctr@hanscom.af.mil, Institute for Scientific Research - Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467,
Webb, D F david.webb.ctr@hanscom.af.mil, Institute for Scientific Research - Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467,

The new AFRL Space Weather Forecasting Laboratory (SWFL) seeks to understand, explore and research the elements involved in developing a successful program of space situational awareness. Originating with the primary solar drivers, space weather envelops a continuum of critically connected heliospheric, ionospheric and thermospheric regimes. Within each regime, a successful space weather awareness and forecast situation requires a multi- pronged effort that spans areas of reliable monitoring, data acquisition and its timely availability, fusing of the data with physical, heuristic and numerical models, and timely now-cast and forecast abilities. In this presentation we will address solar drivers. We will illustrate the need for monitoring solar surface phenomena. Within the realm of solar drivers, eruptive solar activity comprises of primarily flares and mass ejections, which are, in turn, driven by local physical conditions of constantly competing magnetic, hydrodynamic and thermodynamic forces. These physical conditions span the entire solar atmosphere from below the visible solar photosphere through chromosphere to corona. We will address the need for timely monitoring of physical conditions leading to these phenomena and the diagnostic potential of various seemingly heterogeneous physical quantities connected to the resultant eruptive activity. A discussion of time-scales of phenomena, and resources/tools required for timely monitoring, cadence, tolerances to latency in data availability, testing/evaluation of physical and data models and the viability of a deterministic now-cast and forecast models will be covered.

SA51A-1533

Investigating Automated Coronal Mass Ejection Prediction Using a Solar Cycle of MDI Magnetograms

* Mason, J P jmason86@gmail.com, UC Santa Cruz, Department of Physics, 211 Interdisciplinary Sciences Building 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, United States
Hoeksema, J todd@sun.stanford.edu, HEPL Solar Observatories Group Stanford University, Cypress C13 466 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305-4085, United States
Falconer, D david.falconer@nasa.gov, NASA Marshall Flight Center, Code VP62, Huntsville, AL 35812, United States

This investigation employs the entire set of synoptic line-of-site magnetograms from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory's (SOHO) Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) to calculate a plethora of characteristics of the magnetic field in active regions, including measures of non-potentiality, the gradient-weighted length of neutral lines, the length along the primary neutral line, and time variation of total flux. These measures are calculated for the disk passage of 1037 NOAA active regions spanning Solar Cycle 23 from 1996 - 2008 in an attempt to determine the ability of line-of-site magnetograms to be used as a predictor of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Several investigators have analyzed photospheric magnetic field observations to determine the potential for solar flare and CME prediction [Falconer, 2001, 2003, 2008; Leka and Barnes, 2003, 2006]. Using data from a variety of sources, both line-of-site and vector magnetograms have been studied. Until now the studies have been restricted to a relatively small sample size and considered just a few measures of non-potentiality. This expansive study is accomplished with an IDL code that automatically searches the MDI database for data related to any NOAA AR, uses a three-iteration primary neutral line finder on remapped data [Bokenkamp, 2007], applies a constant-alpha force-free field model [Allisandrakis, 1981], and calculates several measures of non-potentiality [Falconer, 2008]. The code has also been designed as a tool for recording and displaying these variables for any specific NOAA AR or user-defined solar location. A similar program can be used with the vector magnetic field data from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) that will become available after the launch of the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO).

SA51A-1534

Comparison of Automated Flare Location Algorithm Results to Solar Truth

Plunkett, S P simon.plunkett@nrl.navy.mil, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20375,
Newmark, J S newmark@nrl.navy.mil, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20375,
Kunkel, V valbona.kunkel@nrl.navy.mil, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030,
Patsourakos, S spiros.patsourakos@nrl.navy.mil, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030,
* McMullin, D R mcmullind@thessrc.com, Space Systems Research Corporation, 1940 Duke Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314,
Hill, S M steven.hill@noaa.gov, NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305,

Accurate and timely detection of solar flares and determination of their heliocentric coordinates are key requirements for space weather forecasting. We report the results of a study to compare the results of multiple algorithms for automated determination of flare locations to "solar truth". The XFL algorithm determines flare locations in near real-time using GOES-12 SXI image data, and is triggered by GOES-12 XRS flare detections. We also consider H-alpha flare locations reported in the FLA data set, and the Latest Events (LEV) locations produced by LMSAL, based on GOES-12 SXI or SOHO EIT observations. We compare the results of each of these algorithms to solar truth heliocentric flare locations determined from analysis of GOES-12 SXI images of several hundred flares of C class and higher, during periods of high, moderate, and low solar activity between 2003 and 2006. We also compare the relative effectiveness of each of these algorithms for determining flare locations in near real-time, considering both timeliness and accuracy of the reported flare locations.

SA51A-1535

Statistical Prediction of Solar Flares Using Magnetic Field Data: A Status Report

* Leka, K leka@cora.nwra.com, NWRA/CoRA Division, 3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder, CO 80301, United States
Barnes, G graham@cora.nwra.com, NWRA/CoRA Division, 3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder, CO 80301, United States
Knoll, J knoll@cora.nwra.com, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Tessein, J A tessein@cora.nwra.com, U. New Hampshire, Dept. of Physics Demerritt Hall, Durham, NH 03824, United States

The energy to power solar flares is undoubtedly stored in the concentrated magnetic field structures of solar active region atmospheres. Exactly how to make use of observations of the solar magnetic field for predicting the occurrence of solar energetic events is, however, a great challenge. Building upon our prior work of "daily" forecasts using a dataset of photospheric magnetic vector field maps, we examine here questions of forecasting ability in light of data source and the target temporal window. We will discuss the benefits and problems of relying upon line-of-sight magnetic field data (vs. vector photospheric magnetic field maps). In addition, we begin to examine changes in forecasting ability, as measured by standard validation statistics, that result from considering different forecasting windows.

SA51A-1536

20th Century Solar Spectral Irradiance Modeling Based on Solar Cycle 22 and 23 Measurements

* Morrill, J jeff.morrill@nrl.navy.mil, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave., Washington, DC 20375,
McMullin, D donald.mcmullin@nrl.navy.mil, Space Systems Research Corp., 1940 Duke St, Alexandria, VA 22314,
Floyd, L linton.floyd@nrl.navy.mil, Interferometrics Inc., 13254 Sunrise Valley Dr, Herndon, VA 20171,
Newmark, J jeffery.newmark@nrl.navy.mil, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave., Washington, DC 20375,

Our long term solar spectral irradiance model under development will include EUV, UV, Visible, and IR spectral irradiance estimates. This model is based, in part, on Ca II K images collected from various observatories. For example, images from the Mt. Wilson Observatory supplemented with Greenwhich Sunspot data are used in the model to produce irradiance estimates for the time period before space-based spectral irradiance observations. The Mt. Wilson Ca II K film archive extending back to 1915 has been recently digitized. We expect to generate estimated spectra back to the start of this data set. We discuss the development details of the various spectral component derived from various spectra and proxies measured during Solar Cycle 22 and 23. Measured and estimated spectra will be compared in time series of various spectral bands as well as in spectra for days with specific solar surface configurations. This work is supported by the NASA LWS program.

SA51A-1537

STRENGTH OF CORONAL MASS EJECTION-DRIVEN SHOCKS NEAR THE SUN AND THEIR IMPORTANCE IN PREDICTING SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENTS

* Shen, C clshen@ustc.edu.cn, cas, State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, Anh 100080, China
* Shen, C clshen@ustc.edu.cn, USTC, CAS Key Laboratory of Basic Plasma Physics, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,Anhui, Anh 230026, China
Wang, Y ymwang@ustc.edu.cn, GMU, Department of Computational and Data Sciences, GeorgeMason University, Fairfax, VA 22030,
Wang, Y ymwang@ustc.edu.cn, USTC, CAS Key Laboratory of Basic Plasma Physics, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,Anhui, Anh 230026, China
Ye, P pzye@ustc.edu.cn, USTC, CAS Key Laboratory of Basic Plasma Physics, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,Anhui, Anh 230026, China
Zhao, X xuepu@sun.Stanford.EDU, Stanford, W.W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University,, Stanford, CA 94305,
Gui, B guibin@mail.ustc.edu.cn, USTC, CAS Key Laboratory of Basic Plasma Physics, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,Anhui, Anh 230026, China
Wang, S swan@ustc.edu.cn, USTC, CAS Key Laboratory of Basic Plasma Physics, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,Anhui, Anh 230026, China

Coronal shocks are an important structure but without direct observations in solar and space physics. The strength of shocks plays a key role in shock-related phenomena, such as radio bursts, SEP generation and so on. This paper will present an improved method of calculating ă and shock strength near the Sun. In the method, observations as many as possible rather than one-dimensional global models are used. Two events, a relatively slow CME on 2001 September 15 and a very fast CME on 2000 June 15, are selected to illustrate the calculation process. The calculation results suggest that the slow CME drove a strong shock with Mach number of 3.43~4.18 while the fast CME drove a relatively weak shock with Mach number of 1.90~3.21. This is consistent with the radio observations that a stronger and longer decameter-hectometric (DH) type II radio burst is found during the first event and a short DH type II radio burst during the second event. Particularly, the calculation results explain the observational fact that the slow CME produced a major solar energetic particle (SEP) event while the fast CME did not. Through the comparison between the two events, the importance of shock strength in predicting SEP events is addressed.

SA51A-1538

Prediction of solar proton event occurrence probability and peak flux using its associated X-ray flux, impulsive time, and longitude

* Park, J jinhye@khu.ac.kr, Kyunghee university, Kyunghee university Dept.of Astronomy and Space Science, 1 Seocheon-dong, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si Gyeonggi-do 446-701, KOREA, Yongin-si, 446-701, Korea, Republic of
Moon, Y moonyj@khu.ac.kr, Kyunghee university, Kyunghee university Dept.of Astronomy and Space Science, 1 Seocheon-dong, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si Gyeonggi-do 446-701, KOREA, Yongin-si, 446-701, Korea, Republic of
Lee, D dhlee@khu.ac.kr, Kyunghee university, Kyunghee university Dept.of Astronomy and Space Science, 1 Seocheon-dong, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si Gyeonggi-do 446-701, KOREA, Yongin-si, 446-701, Korea, Republic of
Youn, S dbstoavna@gmail.com, Kyunghee university, Kyunghee university Dept.of Astronomy and Space Science, 1 Seocheon-dong, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si Gyeonggi-do 446-701, KOREA, Yongin-si, 446-701, Korea, Republic of

Solar proton events have been regarded to be very important in that they may cause the damage of spacecrafts and human activities. In this study, we examined the longitudinal dependence of solar proton events and their relationships with x-ray flares. For this we used NOAA proton events whose fluxes of > 10 MeV protons are greater than 10 particles cm-2 sec-1 ster-1 from 1976 to 2006, and their associated X- ray flare data. As a result, we found that 181 proton events, of which most of them (169/181) are associated with major flares (85 X-class and 84 M-class). Then we examined the fraction of proton events relative to total major X-ray flares and its longitudinal dependence. We found that about only 3.6%(2.0% for M-class and 20.7% for X-class) of the flares are associated with the proton events. This fraction strongly depends on helio-longitude; for example, the fraction for 30W

SA51A-1539

Geometric Localization and Polarimetric Localization: Space Weather Tools to Calculate CME Propagation Characteristics

* Pizzo, V J vic.pizzo@noaa.gov, NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center, Mail Code W/NP9 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, United States
de Koning, C A curt.a.dekoning@noaa.gov, University of Colorado, CIRES-SWPC, Mail Code W/NP9 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, United States

The geometric localization technique [Pizzo and Biesecker, 2004] utilizes a series of lines of sight from two space-based coronagraphs to determine gross propagation characteristics of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in three-dimensional space. The polarimetric localization technique [Moran and Davila, 2004] uses the percent polarization observed by a single coronagraph to obtain a three-dimensional reconstruction of a CME. Both techniques can be used in near-real-time within an operational space weather forecast center. When these two independent techniques are used in conjunction with each other to analyze STEREO/Secchi/COR2 beacon data, they can provide significant constraints on the three-dimensional location and velocity, including speed and direction, for any Earth-directed CME. Here, we employ these techniques to the CME of 31 December 2007 and compare results on the speed and direction of propagation for this CME.

SA51A-1540

The RELativistic Electron Alert System for Exploration (RELEASE): Scope, Verification and Validation Status, and Intended Future Use

* Posner, A aposner@swri.org, Southhwest Research Institute, Space Science and Engineering Division 6220 Culebra Rd, San Antonio, TX 78238, United States
Rother, O rother@physik.uni-kiel.de, University of Kiel, IEAP Leibnizstr. 11, Kiel, 24118, Germany
Heber, B heber@physik.uni-kiel.de, University of Kiel, IEAP Leibnizstr. 11, Kiel, 24118, Germany
Mueller-Mellin, R mueller-mellin@physik.uni-kiel.de, University of Kiel, IEAP Leibnizstr. 11, Kiel, 24118, Germany
Krause, A akrause@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de, University of Heidelberg, Seminarstr. 2, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany

The RELEASE method of short-term forecasting of the intensity of prompt solar energetic protons of hazardous energies (~40 MeV) with relativistic electrons has been developed. Electrons are well known to provide the first sign of a solar particle event in progress, approximately one our ahead of more dangerous protons. The forecasting of sudden intensity increases of protons from solar energetic particle events is relevant for in-situ and regional (e.g., Earth-moon system) radiation protection of humans on exploration missions. The method utilizes the speed advantage of electrons over up to 40 MeV protons and newly discovered correlations of inverse rise time and intensity between the two dominant particle species of solar eruptions. The effectiveness of this tool bases on the observed similarities in particle transport between the Sun and 1 AU. Electrons act as test particles by probing the ever- changing heliospheric transport conditions that act on the slower moving protons. In February 2008, the method has been implemented with near-real- time data of the COSTEP instrument onboard SOHO located at L1. Forecasting output is available live via the internet. The ongoing verification and validation activity so far has proven the robustness and reliability of the tool under quiet conditions with an extremely low false-alarm rate. Ongoing activities aimed at improving the method with archived COSTEP data over a full solar cycle will be presented.

http://www-etph.physik.uni-kiel.de/missions/soho/costep/realtime/forecast/

SA51A-1541

A Sensitivity Study Using ENLIL Solar Wind And Cone CME Model

* Lee, C O clee@ssl.berkeley.edu, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720,
Odstrcil, D Dusan.Odstrcil@noaa.gov, CIRES/SEC/NOAA Univ. of Colorado, 216 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309,
Luhmann, J G jgluhman@ssl.berkeley.edu, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720,
de Pater, I imke@astron.berkeley.edu, Department of Astronomy, UC Berkeley, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720,

We perform a parametric study of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) launched into the inner heliosphere using the 3D ENLIL numerical solar wind model together with the Cone model. The cone model is a simple geometrical model that uses a cone shape to characterize the angular width and the central position of a halo CME. For this study, the CMEs are launched into an idealized ambient solar wind background at different locations with respect to the streamer belt. We investigate the sensitivity of the ENLIL + Cone model to CMEs with varying densities, launch speeds and sizes, to small variations in launch direction, and to grid resolution. We compare the properties of the ICMEs arriving at 1 AU from different vantage points (including the Sun- Earth line) such as their shock strengths and propagation times. This research is part of an ongoing effort to validate the WSA/ENLIL model and is supported by the Air Force Research Lab Space Vehicles Directorate.

SA51A-1542

Validating the SWAGE (Solar Wind Acting on the Geophysical Environment) Model Using Ground-based and Satellite Data

* Rothwell, P L paul.rothwell@hanscom.af.mil, Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory, Hanscom Air Force Base, Bedford, MA 01731, United States
Jasperse, J R john.jasperse@hanscom.af.mil, Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory, Hanscom Air Force Base, Bedford, MA 01731, United States

In an earlier work [Rothwell and Jasperse, 2006] we derived the global ionospheric electric field produced by the Region-1 and Region-2 currents based on the ACE solar wind data. Despite the simplifying assumptions in that work of both the dipole and spin axis being aligned perpendicular to ecliptic plane we found significant agreement with Jicamarca vertical drift data, particularly during the November 2004 magnetic storm. Based on data availability, we will extend our comparisons using the recently launched C/NOFS satellite. Also, in order to extend the model to arbitrary geographic locations we now take into account 1) a non-spin-aligned magnetic dipole, as well as local IGRF modifications in the B-field, 2) a solar-driven ionospheric conductance model in GSE coordinates, well-defined near the terminators, and 3) the Region-1 and Region-2 currents defined in magnetic coordinates. As in the previous work, Region-1 and Region-2 currents are related, using the Hill-Siscoe transpolar potential model, to the solar wind data as measured at L1 by the ACE satellite. In this way, we intend to build a useful Space Weather Forecasting tool by which the time-dependent, solar- driven ionospheric electric field is defined at arbitrary geographic locations. Rothwell, P. L., and J. R. Jasperse(2006) Modeling the connection of the global ionospheric electric fields to the solar wind, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A3211, Doi:10.1029/2004JA010992.

SA51A-1543

Numerical space weather forecast of the solar wind and radiation belts

* Kataoka, R ryuho@riken.jp, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, 351-0198, Japan
Miyoshi, Y miyoshi@stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp, Nagoya University, Furo-cho Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan
Hayashi, K khayashi@stanford.edu, Stanford University, 491 South Service Road, Stanford, CA 94305-4085, United States

Large-scale solar wind structures and the magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) parameters at the Earthfs position are essential for driving the space weather phenomena such as geomagnetic storms, geomagnetically induced currents, and radiation belt enhancement. We report our recent progress on the real-time space weather modeling of the solar wind and radiation belts. The global MHD solar wind model and the Fokker-Planck type radiation belt model are coupled via the time-varying solar wind MHD parameters at the Earthfs position to give a quantitative estimate of the outer belt electron flux for a week in advance. The background solar wind source at 30 solar radii is provided from global MHD corona model based on SOHO MDI real-time observations. Coronal mass ejection (CME) is the most challenging factor. We show our test approach how to simulate the CMEs in real-time. A probabilistic forecast system of the outer radiation belt has been operated for about a year and is open to public via internet. We present how the numerical forecast and the probabilistic forecast work together to understand the space radiation environment in real-time.

http://hbksw1.stelab.nagoya- u.ac.jp/

SA51A-1544

Initial Validation of the Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Module

* Kozarev, K kamen@bu.edu, Boston University, Astronomy Department, 725 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215,
Schwadron, N nathanas@bu.edu, Boston University, Astronomy Department, 725 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215,
Al-Dayeh, M maher.aldayeh@swri.org, Southwest Research Institute, PO Drawer 28510, 6220 Culebra Rd, San Antonio, TX 78238,
Townsend, L ltownsen@tennessee.edu, The University of Tennessee, Department of Nuclear Engineering, 211 Pasqua Engineering Building, Knoxville, TN 37996,
Desai, M mdesai@swri.edu, Southwest Research Institute, PO Drawer 28510, 6220 Culebra Rd, San Antonio, TX 78238,
Hatcher, R rhatcher@utk.edu, The University of Tennessee, Department of Nuclear Engineering, 211 Pasqua Engineering Building, Knoxville, TN 37996,

The central objective of the Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Module (EMMREM) is to develop a numerical model for completely characterizing the time-dependent radiation environment in the Earth-Moon- Mars and Interplanetary space environments. The Module includes a 3D energetic particle transport model (EPREM), and utilizes a version of the Baryon Transport code (BRYNTRN). With the initial setup of the EMMREM framework in place, we are turning to performing realistic simulations and comparisons with observations from GOES, Ulysses, LRO/CRaTER, and MSL/RAD. We present the results from a validation of the EMMREM module for characterizing the space radiation environment of the inner Heliosphere. Simultaneous observations by GOES and ULYSSES of solar energetic protons for several major SEP events are compared with EMMREM simulations, and resulting proton flux time series analyzed to determine the quality of the fit. EMMREM predictions for the dose equivalent and accumulated dose equivalent throughout those events are discussed. We also compare a well established benchmark proton fluence spectrum for the August 1972 SEP event based on IMP-5 spacecraft observations with EMMREM simulations for the locations of IMP-5 (1 AU) and Pioneer 10 (2 AU), and discuss accumulated radiation quantities throughout the event.

SA51A-1545

The Importance of Secondary Electron and Backscattered Electron Emissions in Spacecraft Charging

* Lai, S T Shu.Lai@Hanscom.af.mil, Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731, United States

Secondary electron and backscattered electron emissions are of central importance in determining the charging level of spacecraft charging. Traditionally, the Sternglass formula and the Sanders-Inouye formula are used for the secondary electron coefficient whereas the Prokopenko-Laframboise formula is used for the backscattered electron coefficient. A survey of the advances in secondary electron coefficient measurements in the past two decades shows that the results are all different. Surface contaminants, surface thickness, and space environment are factors affecting the secondary electron coefficients. These results affect spacecraft charging level calculations, especially at high levels above kilovolts. According to the Prokopenko-Laframboise formula, the backscattering electron coefficient approaches a small value as the primary electron energy approaches zero. Recent advances, however, have revealed that the backscattering electron coefficient approaches unity at zero energy. This result affects spacecraft charging level calculations, especially at low levels below about 50 volts.

SA51A-1546

The Geophysical Institute Magnetometer Array: Making Real-Time Geophysical Measurements Available for Operational Space Weather Needs

* Galbraith, J chocolatechippancakes@gmail.com, University of Alaska Southeast, 11120 Glacier Highway, Juneau, AK 99801, United States
Heavner, M matt.heavner@gmail.com, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, 903 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775, United States
Heavner, M matt.heavner@gmail.com, University of Alaska Southeast, 11120 Glacier Highway, Juneau, AK 99801, United States
Wilkinson, D debi@gi.alaska.edu, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, 903 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775, United States

The Geophysical Institute Magnetometer Array (GIMA) consists of twelve magnetometer stations distributed across Alaska cutting the auroral oval. Each station is equipped with a ring-core, fluxgate magnetometer, GPS clock and data logger. Data is returned from each station to the Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska where it is verified, archived, and made available to the space science community. The GIMA web page, at http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/, provides the data from nine stations online in real-time. Additionally, the GIMA web page provides data from non-GIMA magnetometer stations. The GIMA data set available online spans the time period 1994 to the present. This presentation describes current efforts to update the data distribution channels while maintaining existing data access methods. In a typical month, there are approximately 30 different users of the data set (some using archival data for event studies, other using real time data for operational Space Weather forecasting). The GIMA data set has been available as ASCII and netCDF data files. We are migrating the data to a PostgreSQL database. This database is coupled with the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geoserver which redistributes the data in various OGC standard-compliant formats (e.g. kml, WCS, WDS). This effort is motivated in large part to improve data discovery by new Space Weather product generators and to feed the data in multiple Virtual Observatories (VxOs). We will describe our efforts and illustrate our successes.

http://akmag.net/

SA51A-1547

A Proxy Method for Estimation of EE-index using MAGDAS/CPMN Data

* Ueno, T t.ueno@geo.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan
Yumoto, K yumoto@serc.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Space Environment Research Center, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan
Uozumi, T uozumi@serc.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Space Environment Research Center, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan
Numata, Y numata@geo.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan
Group, M yumoto@serc.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Space Environment Research Center, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan

EE-index (EDst, EU, and EL) is a new index proposed by Space Environment Research Center, Kyushu University (see Uozumi et al., 2008) to monitor temporal and long-term variations of the equatorial electrojet (EEJ). EU and EL mainly represent the range of EEJ and CEJ (equatorial counter electrojet) components, respectively. The baseline levels of EU and EL are obtained by averaging the H-component magnetic variations observed at the nightside (LT = 18-06) MAGDAS/CPMN stations along the magnetic equator. EDst, defined by Uozumi et al. (2008) fluctuates depending on the number of stations in the nightside sector (LT = 18-06). If the number is few, EDst may include some local fluctuations: the partial ring current component, substorm component and so on. Such local components cause some error in estimating the baseline level of EU or EL. Therefore, we need to use as many stations' data as possible in order to derive EU and EL properly. Pacific region is one of the most difficult areas to measure the magnetic field near the dip equator, because there are few islands. In the present paper, we developed a new method to use the data obtained from Ewa Beach (EWA; G. Lat. = 21.32N, G. Long. = 158.0W, Dip Lat. = 38.03), Hawaii, USA for estimation of EDst. EWA is not the equatorial station, but its nighttime H-component magnetic variations are found to be similar to those of Christmas Island (CXI; G. Lat. = 2.05N, G. Long. = 157.5W, Dip Lat. = 5.24), Kiribati. Data from EWA can be used as a proxy of that from CXI for monitoring temporal and long-term variations of the equatorial electrojet (EEJ) in real time. Acknowledgements: Authors appreciate Prof. Hisashi Utada of Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo for supplying the magnetometer data from Christmas Island, Kiribati. Our deepest gratitude goes to all the members of the MAGDAS/CPMN project for their ceaseless support. Especially, we wish to thank the staffs of the observation stations: Dr. Baylie Damtie (Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia; AAB), Dr. Ronald Woodman Pollitt and Dr. Jose Ishitsuka (Instituto Geofisico del Peru; ANC), Fr. Daniel McNamara (Manila Observatory, Philippines; DAV), Ms. Lynn Kaisan (NOAA Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, HI, USA; EWA), Dr. Mazlan Othman and Dr. Mohd Fairos (National Space Agency, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia; LKW) and Prof. Archana Bhattacharya (Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, India; TIR) for their kind cooperation.

SA51A-1548

Long-term Spectral Peaks of EEJ amplitudes observed by MAGDAS/CPMN

* Numata, Y numata@geo.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Space and Earth Electromagnetism Laboratory Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Graduate School of Science, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku,, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan
Ueno, T t.ueno@geo.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Space and Earth Electromagnetism Laboratory Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Graduate School of Science, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku,, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan
Hirano, T t-hirano@geo.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Space and Earth Electromagnetism Laboratory Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Graduate School of Science, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku,, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan
Uozumi, T uozumi@serc.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Space Environment Research Center, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan
Yumoto, K yumoto@serc.kyushu-u.ac.jp, Space Environment Research Center, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan

The ultimate goal of this study is to understand the couplings of, and independencies in, the Solar wind- Magnetosphere-Ionosphere-Atmosphere (S-M-I-A) system. For this goal, in this paper we analyze ground magnetometer data from the DAV, MUT and ANC stations. DAV (Davao, Philippines at GM lat.-1.37, GM lon.196.53). MUT (Muntinlupa, Philippines at GM lat.6.26, GM lon.192.22). ANC (Ancon, Peru at GM lat.3.05, GM lon.354.40). These are three stations of the MAGDAS/CPMN (MAGnetic Data Acquisition System/Circum- pan Pacific Magnetometer Network). The MAGDAS/CPMN network has been constructed by SERC, Kyushu University, and widely covers the world. DAV is located at the intersection of the 210 degree magnetic meridian and the magnetic equator. We examined the relationships among the EEJ (equatorial electrojet) amplitude, the F10.7 solar radiation flux and the cowling conductivity. The EEJ flows roughly between the altitudes of 90km and 130km in the ionosphere. The intensity of the EEJ increases especially around noon time between the geomagnetic latitudes of +3deg and -3deg. We newly defined ethe EEJ amplitudef by subtracting the H-component magnetic field at night time from the averaged H-component at daytime 10:30'12:30LT. The F10.7 is the solar radiation flux (1 day data) measured at the Dominion Radio Astrophysical observatory, Canada [ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/]. The cowling conductivity is estimated using the IRI model (International Reference Ionosphere 2007 [http://iri.gsfc.nasa.gov/]). We have analyzed spectral peaks of the EEJ amplitude at DAV, MUT and ANC and the F10.7 solar radiation flux during the period from Jan. 1, 1999 to Dec. 31, 2001. Long-term variations of the EEJ amplitude having the period of several months are focused, and compared those of with the F10.7 solar radiation flux. A strong spectral peak of the EEJ amplitude at semi-annual period is found to show higher harmonic structure. Other strong spectral peaks of the EEJ amplitude are also found at 32, 26.7 and 14.5 days. A strong spectral peaks of F10.7 are also found at 365, 156~137, 26.7 days. These results suggest that the common period at 26.7 days between the EEJ amplitude and F10.7 is oscillated with the solar rotation. The spectral peaks periods at semi-annual, 32 and 14.5 of the EEJ amplitude are not oscillated with the not solar radiation but must be related with the ionospheric and atmospheric dynamics.

SA51A-1549

Prototype one day lead time forecasts of the magnetosphere with ENLIL and OpenGGCM

* Larson, D J Douglas.Larson@unh.edu, University of New Hampshire, Space Science Center 250 Morse Hall 8 College Road, Durham, NH 03824-2600, United States
Odstrcil, D dusan.odstrcil@colorado.edu, NOAA/SEC University of Colorado at Boulder, 216 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0216, United States
Raeder, J j.raeder@unh.edu, University of New Hampshire, Space Science Center 250 Morse Hall 8 College Road, Durham, NH 03824-2600, United States
Germaschewski, K kai@artemis.sr.unh.edu, University of New Hampshire, Space Science Center 250 Morse Hall 8 College Road, Durham, NH 03824-2600, United States

Forecasting the state of the magnetosphere is currently limited to lead times of the order of 30 minutes when data from a L1 monitor are used. In order to improve the forecast window we use ENLIL, an established heliosphere model, to first predict the solar wind state immediately upstream of Earth. The predicted solar wind and magnetic field are then used to drive the OpenGGCM magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere model. With this combination the magnetosphere state, for example ionosphere currents and magnetosphere particle fluxes, can be forecast up to two days in advance. In this presentation we investigate the accuracy of such predictions and we discuss the prospects for continuous magnetosphere ensemble forecasts utilizing novel fast hardware such as the Cell based PS3 game consoles with appropriately optimized model software.

SA51A-1550

The Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE): A new facility for real-time magnetosphere-ionosphere monitoring

* Anderson, B J brian.anderson@jhuapl.edu, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723, United States
Korth, H haje.korth@jhuapl.edu, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723, United States
Waters, C L Colin.Waters@newcastle.edu.au, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
Barnes, R M robin.barnes@jhuapl.edu, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723, United States
Weiss, M B michele.weiss@jhuapl.edu, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723, United States

NSF is sponsoring a new facility to provide global, continuous determination of the Birkeland current system using the Iridium satellite constellation. The Iridium network consists of 66 satellites in 780-km altitude, circular, near-polar orbits, which are evenly distributed among six equally-spaced orbit planes. The satellites in each orbit plane are spaced by nine minutes along track. The avionics of every satellite includes a vector magnetometer that is sensitive enough to detect the magnetic perturbations of the Birkeland currents. While the magnetometers are read rapidly on-board, only one vector sample per satellite is transmitted to the ground once every 200 seconds for engineering monitoring. The corresponding latitude spacing is about 15 degrees, whereas degree-scale resolution is required to resolve the Birkeland currents. AMPERE will achieve a 100-fold increase in the amount of data sent to the ground, thus allowing us to derive global Birkeland current distributions with sub-degree latitude resolution every nine minutes. Because the data are transmitted via the satellite network, data products will be available continuously in very-near-real time, within 20 minutes of on orbit data acquisition. By providing 24/7 real-time observations of the Birkeland currents with global coverage throughout all ranges of geomagnetic activity, AMPERE will be the first-ever facility to monitor the electrodynamic state of the magnetosphere-ionosphere system throughout geomagnetic storms. The system architecture, data products, and operation plans will be discussed together with the development tasks, schedule, and status.

http://ampere.jhuapl.edu

SA51A-1551

Comparison of AMIE modeled and Sondrestrom measured Joule heating: a study in model resolution and electric field/conductivity correlation

* Cosgrove, R B russell.cosgrove@sri.com, Center for Geospace Studies, SRI Interbational, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States
Lu, G ganglu@ucar.edu, High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, United States
Bahcivan, H hasan.bahcivan@sri.com, Center for Geospace Studies, SRI Interbational, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States
Matsuo, T tomoko.matsuo@noaa.gov, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, CIRES Bldg., Rm. 318, Boulder, CO 80309, United States
Heinselman, C craig.heinselman@sri.com, Center for Geospace Studies, SRI Interbational, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States
McCready, M mary.mccready@sri.com, Center for Geospace Studies, SRI Interbational, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States

Joule heating by high-latitude ionospheric electric fields is underestimated by global models, and the source of the underestimation is generally thought to be "electric field variability," which is often interpreted to mean structure in the electric field below the resolution of the electric field model. We investigate this and related issues by (1) comparing the Joule heating measured by the Sondrestrom incoherent scatter radar during a 40 hour period containing a storm with the Joule heating modeled by the Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) procedure; and (2) employing an M-I coupling model to analyze the dependence of Joule heating estimates on the spatial-resolution of the inputs, to facilitate the AMIE and Sondrestrom comparison. We find that, as compared with Sondrestrom measurements, a much larger contribution from correlation between conductance and squared-electric-field (which is positive for AMIE, and negative for Sondrestrom) partially compensates for a much smaller mean-squared electric field, such that the overall average Joule heating rate modeled by AMIE is 29% less than measured by Sondrestrom. The underestimation of the mean-squared electric field was not associated with small-temporal-scale variability. Using the MI coupling model it is shown that one way to explain the correlation-contribution is by a difference in spatial resolution, although an alternative explanation is found in effects related to AMIE's reliance on magnetometers. Surprisingly, the M-I coupling model also finds that coarse spatial resolution causes overestimation of the Joule heating rate, due to the finding that the sub-resolution-scale spacial-fluctuations in conductance and squared-electric-field are anticorrelated. When comparing estimates of the total Joule heating over a period of time, the increased Joule heating arises as a larger contribution from temporal-correlation between conductance and squared-squared-electric-field, which overcompensates for the reduced mean-squared electric field.

SA51A-1552

Imaging geospace electrons using Thomson scattering: A new tool for operational space weather monitoring

* Chua, D H damien.chua@nrl.navy.mil, Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20375, United States
Englert, C R christoph.englert@nrl.navy.mil, Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20375, United States
Meier, R R robert.meier@nrl.navy.mil, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive MSN 6C3, Fairfax, VA 22030, United States
Socker, D G dennis.socker@nrl.navy.mil, Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20375, United States
Picone, J M j.picone.ctr@nrl.navy.mil, Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20375, United States
Carter, M T, Praxis, Inc., 5845 Richmond Highway, Suite 700, Alexandria, VA 22303, United States
Huba, J D joe.huba@nrl.navy.mil, Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20375, United States
Slinker, S P steve.slinker@nrl.navy.mil, Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20375, United States
Krall, J F jon.krall@nrl.navy.mil, Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20375, United States
Vincent, W S william.s.vincent@nrl.navy.mil, Spacecraft Engineering Department, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20375, United States

Observing Thomson scattered, visible solar radiation provides a means to directly and globally image the electron distributions in the Earth's ionosphere, plasmasphere, and the magnetosphere. Such observations would provide a revolutionary capability to directly observe for the first time how electron densities in the near-Earth space environment respond to forcing from the solar wind, leading to great improvements to and likely evolution of now data-starved operational space environment forecasting models. Images of Thomson scattered light have been used successfully to observe the solar electron corona and heliospheric structures such as coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and co-rotating interaction regions (CIRs). We investigate the feasibility of adapting this remote sensing technique to directly image the electrons in geospace for the first time. The brightness of Thomson scattered solar radiation from geospace is computed using line of sight electron column densities provided by the SAMI3 model of the ionosphere, coupled to the Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry (LFM) global MHD model of the magnetosphere. While the calculated Thomson scattering brightness from geospace electrons is faint compared to the expected background sources (e.g. zodiacal light, instrumental scattered light) we show that it is feasible, although challenging, to make this measurement. We present our preliminary mission concept and our proposed path toward an operational space environment monitoring system.

SA51A-1553

Current and Future Development of the Operational Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements (GAIM)

* Dandenault, P patrick.dandenault@nrl.navy.mil, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Drive SW, Washington, DC 20375,
Coker, C clayton.coker@nrl.navy.mil, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Drive SW, Washington, DC 20375,
Thonnard, S stefan.thonnard@nrl.navy.mil, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Drive SW, Washington, DC 20375,
Schunk, B robert.schunk@usu.edu, Utah State University, 0160 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322,
Thompson, D don.thompson@usu.edu, Utah State University, 0160 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322,
Smith, D david.smith@losangeles.af.mil, Air Force Weather Agency, One Peacekeeper Blvd, Bellevue, NE 68123,
Weaver, S kinkelas@offutt.af.mil, Air Force Weather Agency, One Peacekeeper Blvd, Bellevue, NE 68123,
Scherliess, L Ludger.Scherliess@usu.edu, Utah State University, 0160 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322,
Reich, J Joseph.Reich@offutt.af.mil, Air Force Weather Agency, One Peacekeeper Blvd, Bellevue, NE 68123,

The DoD Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements (GAIM) model for ionospheric specification and prediction went operational in at the Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) in December 2006. The current operational version of GAIM uses a physics-based model of the ionosphere and a Kalman filter as a basis for assimilating a diverse set of measurements in near real time. The physics-based model is the Ionosphere Forecast Model (IFM), which is global and covers the E-region, F-region, and topside from 90 km to 1400 km and includes the five ions NO+, O2+, N2+, O+, and H+. The operational model originally ingested data from DISS Ionosondes, ground-based GPS, and in-situ electron density measurements from the Defense Meteorological Satellites Program (DMSP) satellites. During the last two years, GAIM has been upgraded to ingest a variety of data types from the Special Sensor Ultraviolet Limb Imager (SSULI) and Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager (SSUSI) ultraviolet sensors on the DMSP satellites. A variety of additional improvements to GAIM are planned over the next five years, including the use of new space weather data products, improved model resolution and computational performance, and improved physics modeling of the upper atmosphere. An overview of the current status and future plans for the project will be presented, along with an overview of what the many researchers and software engineers have accomplished since the program started as a DoD Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) in 1999.

SA51A-1554

A Statistical Comparison of Vertical Total Electron Content (TEC) from Three Ionospheric Models

* Jones, M mcjones@marauder.millersville.edu, Millersville University, Millersville University PO Box 1002 1 South George St., Millersville, PA 17551, United States
* Jones, M mcjones@marauder.millersville.edu, Significant Opportunites in Atmospheric Research and Science (SOARS), SOARS University Corporation for Atmospheric Research P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, United States
Codrescu, M Mihail.Codrescu@noaa.gov, Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC), NOAA/ National Weather Service National Centers for Environmental Prediction Space Weather Prediction Center, W/NP9 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, United States
Gannon, J Jennifer.Gannon@noaa.gov, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science (CIRES), University of Colorado at Boulder CIRES Bldg., Rm. 318, Boulder, CO 80309, United States
Gannon, J Jennifer.Gannon@noaa.gov, Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC), NOAA/ National Weather Service National Centers for Environmental Prediction Space Weather Prediction Center, W/NP9 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, United States

Total electron content (TEC) exhibits significant variations in both space and time depending upon latitude, longitude, solar cycle, UTC, and season; these variations can have potentially negative effects on communication and navigation systems. Recently, three models have provided accurate results in reconstructing and/or calculating real-time (or near real-time) vertical TEC values: the Utah State University Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements (USU GAIM) Gauss-Markov Kalman Filter Model, the United States Total Electron Content (US-TEC) Model, and the Coupled Thermosphere Ionosphere Plasmasphere electrodynamics (CTIPe) Model. This research offers a statistical comparison of the vertical TEC outputs from the previously mentioned models on both a global and local (over the continental US) scale during the month of July 2008. We present the average difference and root mean square difference (RMS difference) for three different model comparisons (e.g. – US-TEC vs. GAIM, US-TEC vs. CTIPe, and GAIM vs. CTIPe). We have documented certain model biases and the differences measured between corresponding data points among the models relative to each comparison. Two out of the three comparisons showed that the US-TEC model's bias predicted higher values of vertical TEC relative to the other models, while the third comparison revealed a small bias in the CTIPe model to forecast greater vertical TEC values when compared to the GAIM model. By computing the RMS difference, we can better examine the source of these biases relative to the aforementioned model comparisons. This is the first step in documenting the biases, errors, and uncertainties associated with these three models.

SA51A-1555

Frequency-Agile Distributed-Sensor System (FADSS) for the Specification of HF Communication Links: Sporadic E Layer Specification

* Rice, D rice@spacenv.com, Space Environment Corporation, 221 N. Spring Creek Pkwy, Suite A, Providence, UT 84332-9791, United States
Sojka, J J sec@spacenv.com, Space Environment Corporation, 221 N. Spring Creek Pkwy, Suite A, Providence, UT 84332-9791, United States
Brady, J E brady@spacenv.com, Space Environment Corporation, 221 N. Spring Creek Pkwy, Suite A, Providence, UT 84332-9791, United States
Eccles, J V vince@spacenv.com, RP Consultants, 7917 Gearhart Street, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, United States
Eccles, J V vince@spacenv.com, Space Environment Corporation, 221 N. Spring Creek Pkwy, Suite A, Providence, UT 84332-9791, United States
Raitt, W J wjraitt@comcast.net, Space Environment Corporation, 221 N. Spring Creek Pkwy, Suite A, Providence, UT 84332-9791, United States
Hunsucker, R D Rdhrpc1@charter.net, RP Consultants, 7917 Gearhart Street, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, United States

The outstanding problem faced by HF operational systems is that ionospheric weather variability is beyond current modeling capabilities. Currently only climatological modeling of the ionosphere is used to specify available HF paths. One significant problem in specifying HF propagation characteristics is the dynamic and unpredictable influence of sporadic E layer occurrence. The presence or absence of sporadic E layers often dominate the HF propagation characteristics. Space Environment Corporation has been developing a distributed sensor network of inexpensive, frequency-agile, beacon monitors that can potentially provide a real-time description of the space weather effects on HF communication systems. This array of software radios is dynamically programmed to measure GPS variations and received signal strengths from select beacons from VLF through HF along a multitude of propagation paths. Through a real-time network, the information is processed to both optimize the frequency selection of the sensors as well as to provide information about the prevailing ionospheric weather conditions. In this paper, we describe the results of a limited deployment of 7 sensors in the Western United States. These data demonstrate capability in determining the temporal, spatial, and magnitude of sporadic E events. A larger deployment of sensors can be used to map these transient structures and provide real-time HF propagation characteristics associated with strong sporadic E events. Acknowledgment: We wish to acknowledge the support of AF-SBIR Funding support through Contract FA8718-07-C-0016.

SA51A-1556

Full-wave reflection of lightning long-wave radio pulses from the ionospheric D- region

* Jacobson, A R abramj@u.washington.edu, University of Washington, Earth and Space Sciences Johnson Hall 070 Box 351310 4000 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195-1310, United States
Shao, X , Los Alamos National Laboratory, ISR-2 Mail Stop D477, Los Alamos, NM 87545, United States
Holzworth, R , University of Washington, Earth and Space Sciences Johnson Hall 070 Box 351310 4000 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195-1310, United States

A model is developed for calculating ionospheric reflection of electromagnetic pulses emitted by lightning, with most energy in the long-wave spectral region (f = 3 - 100 kHz). The building-block of the calculation is a differential-equation full-wave solution of Maxwell's Equations for the complex reflection of individual plane waves incident from below, by the anisotropic, dissipative, diffuse dielectric profile of the lower ionosphere. This full-wave solution is then put into a summation over plane waves in an angular Direct Fourier Transform to obtain the reflection properties of curved wavefronts. This step models also the diffraction effects of long- wave ionospheric reflections observed at short or medium range (200 - 500 km). The calculation can be done with any arbitrary but smooth dielectric profile versus altitude. For an initial test, we use the classic D- region exponential profiles of electron density and collision rate given by Wait. With even these simple profiles, our model of full-wave reflection of curved wavefronts captures some of the basic attributes of observed reflected waveforms recorded with the Los Alamos Sferic Array.

SA51A-1557

Forecasting Equatorial Scintillation Activity in Real-time

* Redmon, R rob.redmon@noaa.gov, NOAA/NGDC, 325 Broadway St. E/GC2, Boulder, CO 80305, United States
Anderson, D David.Anderson@noaa.gov, NOAA/SWPC, 325 Broadway St., Boulder, CO 80305, United States
Caton, R G rcaton@aer.com, Atmospheric, 131 Hartwell Ave., Lexington, MA 02421, United States
Bullett, T W terry.bullett@noaa.gov, NOAA/NGDC, 325 Broadway St. E/GC2, Boulder, CO 80305, United States

It is well-known that the generation of equatorial, F-region plasma density irregularities, via the Generalized Rayleigh-Taylor instability mechanism is critically dependent on the magnitude of the pre-reversal enhancement (PRE) in upward ExB drift velocity after sunset. These plasma density "bubbles" that are generated after sunset lead to the "scintillation" of trans-ionospheric radio wave signals that pass through these bubbles and is commonly referred to as "scintillation activity". Communication and Navigation systems can be severely disrupted by these plasma density irregularities. A measure of scintillation activity is given by the "S4 Index" and a network of Air Force, ground-based UHF and L-band receivers measuring the S4 Index is called the SCIntillation Network Decision Aid (SCINDA) network. This paper describes a technique for automatically forecasting, in real-time, the occurrence or non-occurrence of scintillation activity that relies on real-time data from a ground-based ionospheric sounder at or near the geomagnetic equator. After sunset, the height-rise with time of the bottom-side of the F-layer reflects the magnitude of the upward ExB drift velocity. The value of the ionospheric parameter, h'f (the virtual height of the bottom-side F-layer) at 1930 LT reflects the integrated ExB drift effect on lifting the F-layer to an altitude where the Rayleigh-Taylor instability mechanism becomes important. Incorporating observed h'f values from the Jicamarca, Peru digital sounder at 1930 LT and relating these values to the Total Hourly S4 Index (THS4) observed by the UHF receiver at the Ancon, Peru SCINDA site, it is found that a "threshold" in h'f exists below which, THS4 < 1 (no scintillation activity) and above which THS4 > 1 (scintillation activity). Examples of Jicamarca sounder observations and h'f values prior to the onset of scintillation activity are given. We present results that describe how the threshold value of h'f changes with solar cycle activity and how these results have been incorporated into a real-time capability for automatically forecasting scintillation activity that is available on Google Earth to all interested parties.

http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov

SA51A-1558

GUVI Spectrograph Mode Observations of the Mid-Latitude Ionosphere

* Comberiate, J M Joseph.Comberiate@jhuapl.edu, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road MP3-E183, Laurel, MD 20723, United States
Paxton, L J Larry.Paxton@jhuapl.edu, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road MP3-E183, Laurel, MD 20723, United States

GUVI has compiled nearly seven years of observations of the ionosphere since its launch in December 2001. Since 2007, GUVI has been operated in "spectrograph" mode. In spectrograph mode the scan mirror is held fixed and the instrument records and downlinks the entire spectrum. This mode is operationally useful because it provides a new view of the ionosphere: we now have the signal to noise ratio to make observations of the solar minimum ionosphere at high spatial resolution on the disk. The increased effective sensitivity of GUVI at 135.6 nm in spectrograph mode has allowed us to observe the optical signature of medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (MSTIDs). MSTIDs have been observed frequently by ground-based instruments but global space-based observations have been limited to date. We will present initial results including characterization of the spatial structure of MSTIDs observed along the GUVI orbit path as it precesses through varying longitudes and local times. GUVI data and data products are routinely provided to AFWA by APL; we will discuss ways to improve GUVI mid-latitude products for operational use.