FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Global Biogeochemical Cycles

 

Index Terms

  • Global Change
  • Global Change: Biogeochemical processes
  • Global Change: Water cycles

Abstract

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, VOL. 14, NO. 3, PP. 795-825, 2000
doi:10.1029/1999GB001138

Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure

Christopher J. Kucharik

Climate, People and Environment Program (CPEP), Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Jonathan A. Foley

Climate, People and Environment Program (CPEP), Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Christine Delire

Climate, People and Environment Program (CPEP), Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Veronica A. Fisher

Climate, People and Environment Program (CPEP), Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Michael T. Coe

Climate, People and Environment Program (CPEP), Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison

John D. Lenters

Climate, People and Environment Program (CPEP), Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Christine Young-Molling

Climate, People and Environment Program (CPEP), Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Navin Ramankutty

Climate, People and Environment Program (CPEP), Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison

John M. Norman

Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Stith T. Gower

Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin, Madison

While a new class of Dynamic Global Ecosystem Models (DGEMs) has emerged in the past few years as an important tool for describing global biogeochemical cycles and atmosphere-biosphere interactions, these models are still largely untested. Here we analyze the behavior of a new DGEM and compare the results to global-scale observations of water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure. In this study, we use version 2 of the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS), which includes several major improvements and additions to the prototype model developed by Foley et al. [1996]. IBIS is designed to be a comprehensive model of the terrestrial biosphere; the model represents a wide range of processes, including land surface physics, canopy physiology, plant phenology, vegetation dynamics and competition, and carbon and nutrient cycling. The model generates global simulations of the surface water balance (e.g., runoff), the terrestrial carbon balance (e.g., net primary production, net ecosystem exchange, soil carbon, aboveground and belowground litter, and soil CO2 fluxes), and vegetation structure (e.g., biomass, leaf area index, and vegetation composition). In order to test the performance of the model, we have assembled a wide range of continental and global-scale data, including measurements of river discharge, net primary production, vegetation structure, root biomass, soil carbon, litter carbon, and soil CO2 flux. Using these field data and model results for the contemporary biosphere (1965–1994), our evaluation shows that simulated patterns of runoff, NPP, biomass, leaf area index, soil carbon, and total soil CO2 flux agree reasonably well with measurements that have been compiled from numerous ecosystems. These results also compare favorably to other global model results.

Received 25 January 1999; accepted 14 October 1999; .

Citation: Kucharik, C. J., J. A. Foley, C. Delire, V. A. Fisher, M. T. Coe, J. D. Lenters, C. Young-Molling, N. Ramankutty, J. M. Norman, and S. T. Gower (2000), Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 14(3), 795–825, doi:10.1029/1999GB001138.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...