FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Geophysical Research Letters

 

Index Terms

  • Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Boundary layer processes
  • Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Land/atmosphere interactions
  • Information Related to Geographic Region: Arctic region

Abstract

Impact of Arctic treeline on synoptic climate

Jason Beringer

School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Australia

Nigel J. Tapper

School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Australia

Ian McHugh

School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Australia

F. S. Chapin III

Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks

Amanda H. Lynch

PAOS/CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Mark C. Serreze

PAOS/CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Andrew Slater

PAOS/CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

The position of the Arctic treeline has been associated with the preferred location of Arctic fronts that demarcate the boundary between Arctic and polar air masses. It has been argued that differences in summer energy balance, particularly in sensible heating, across treeline between forest and tundra may help determine the location of these frontal zones. Our observations of the energy balance at treeline show that the daily averaged summer heating contrast between treeline forest and tundra is an order of magnitude less than that previously proposed and that the influence on the atmosphere is confined to a shallow layer. In addition, maximum heating contrasts occurred in spring rather than in summer when the Arctic frontal zone is best expressed. Hence energy‐balance contrasts at treeline are unlikely to be the major determinant of the position of the Arctic front.

Received 29 January 2001; accepted 13 April 2001; .

Citation: Beringer, J., N. J. Tapper, I. McHugh, F. S. Chapin III, A. H. Lynch, M. C. Serreze, and A. Slater (2001), Impact of Arctic treeline on synoptic climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(22), 4247–4250.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...