FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmospheres

 

Index Terms

  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Middle atmosphere—constituent transport and chemistry
  • Global Change: Atmosphere
  • Information Related to Geographic Region: Arctic region
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Constituent sources and sinks
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Middle atmosphere—composition and chemistry
Abstract
Cited By (42)
 

Abstract

Chemical depletion of Arctic ozone in winter 1999/2000

M. Rex

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany

R. J. Salawitch

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

N. R. P. Harris

European Ozone Research Coordinating Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

P. von der Gathen

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany

G. O. Braathen

Norsk Institutt for Luftforskning, Kjeller, Norway

A. Schulz

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany

H. Deckelmann

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany

M. Chipperfield

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

B.-M. Sinnhuber

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

E. Reimer

Meteorological Institute, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

R. Alfier

Meteorological Institute, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

R. Bevilacqua

Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., USA

K. Hoppel

Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., USA

M. Fromm

Computational Physics, Inc., Springfield, Virginia, USA

J. Lumpe

Computational Physics, Inc., Springfield, Virginia, USA

H. Küllmann

Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

A. Kleinböhl

Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

H. Bremer

Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

M. von König

Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

K. Künzi

Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

D. Toohey

Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

H. Vömel

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

E. Richard

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

K. Aikin

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

H. Jost

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA

J. B. Greenblatt

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA

M. Loewenstein

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA

J. R. Podolske

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA

C. R. Webster

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

G. J. Flesch

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

D. C. Scott

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

R. L. Herman

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

J. W. Elkins

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

E. A. Ray

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

F. L. Moore

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

D. F. Hurst

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

P. Romashkin

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

G. C. Toon

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

B. Sen

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

J. J. Margitan

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

P. Wennberg

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

R. Neuber

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany

M. Allart

Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut, De Bilt, Netherlands

B. R. Bojkov

Norsk Institutt for Luftforskning, Kjeller, Norway

H. Claude

Deutscher Wetterdienst, Observatory Hohenpeißenberg, Hohenpeißenberg, Germany

J. Davies

Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada

W. Davies

Department of Physics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Wales, UK

H. De Backer

Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium

H. Dier

Meteorologisches Observatorium, Lindenberg, Germany

V. Dorokhov

Central Aerological Observatory, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia

H. Fast

Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada

Y. Kondo

Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Toyokawa, Aichi, Japan

E. Kyrö

Sodankylä Meteorological Observatory, Sodankylä, Finland

Z. Litynska

Centre of Aerology, Legionowo, Poland

I. S. Mikkelsen

Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark

M. J. Molyneux

UK Met Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK

E. Moran

Valentia Observatory, Irish Meteorological Service, Cahirciveen, County Kerry, Ireland

T. Nagai

Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

H. Nakane

National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

C. Parrondo

Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial, Torrejon de Argoz, Madrid, Spain

F. Ravegnani

Fisbat Institute, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna, Italy

P. Skrivankova

Czech Hydrometical Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

P. Viatte

Swiss Meteorological Institute, Les Invuardes, Switzerland

V. Yushkov

Central Aerological Observatory, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia

During Arctic winters with a cold, stable stratospheric circulation, reactions on the surface of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) lead to elevated abundances of chlorine monoxide (ClO) that, in the presence of sunlight, destroy ozone. Here we show that PSCs were more widespread during the 1999/2000 Arctic winter than for any other Arctic winter in the past two decades. We have used three fundamentally different approaches to derive the degree of chemical ozone loss from ozonesonde, balloon, aircraft, and satellite instruments. We show that the ozone losses derived from these different instruments and approaches agree very well, resulting in a high level of confidence in the results. Chemical processes led to a 70% reduction of ozone for a region ∼1 km thick of the lower stratosphere, the largest degree of local loss ever reported for the Arctic. The Match analysis of ozonesonde data shows that the accumulated chemical loss of ozone inside the Arctic vortex totaled 117 ± 14 Dobson units (DU) by the end of winter. This loss, combined with dynamical redistribution of air parcels, resulted in a 88 ± 13 DU reduction in total column ozone compared to the amount that would have been present in the absence of any chemical loss. The chemical loss of ozone throughout the winter was nearly balanced by dynamical resupply of ozone to the vortex, resulting in a relatively constant value of total ozone of 340 ± 50 DU between early January and late March. This observation of nearly constant total ozone in the Arctic vortex is in contrast to the increase of total column ozone between January and March that is observed during most years.

Published 20 September 2002.

Citation: Rex, M., et al. (2002), Chemical depletion of Arctic ozone in winter 1999/2000, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D20), 8276, doi:10.1029/2001JD000533.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...