FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmospheres

 

Index Terms

  • Oceanography: Biological and Chemical: Carbon cycling
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Biosphere/atmosphere interactions
  • Hydrology: Plant ecology
  • Global Change: Atmosphere
Abstract
Cited By (83)
 

Abstract

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 107, 4050, 23 PP., 2002
doi:10.1029/2001JD001242

Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity

Lianhong Gu

Ecosystem Science Division, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

Dennis Baldocchi

Ecosystem Science Division, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

Shashi B. Verma

School of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

T. A. Black

Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Timo Vesala

Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Eva M. Falge

Department of Plant Ecology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

Pete R. Dowty

Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Clouds and aerosols alter the proportion of diffuse radiation in global solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface. It is known that diffuse and direct beam radiation differ in the way they transfer through plant canopies and affect the summation of nonlinear processes like photosynthesis differently than what would occur at the leaf scale. We compared the relative efficiencies of canopy photosynthesis to diffuse and direct photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for a Scots pine forest, an aspen forest, a mixed deciduous forest, a tallgrass prairie and a winter wheat crop. The comparison was based on the seasonal patterns of the parameters that define the canopy photosynthetic responses to diffuse PAR and those that define the responses to direct PAR. These parameters were inferred from half-hourly tower CO2 flux measurements. We found that: (1) diffuse radiation results in higher light use efficiencies by plant canopies; (2) diffuse radiation has much less tendency to cause canopy photosynthetic saturation; (3) the advantages of diffuse radiation over direct radiation increase with radiation level; (4) temperature as well as vapor pressure deficit can cause different responses in diffuse and direct canopy photosynthesis, indicating that their impacts on terrestrial ecosystem carbon assimilation may depend on radiation regimes and thus sky conditions. These findings call for different treatments of diffuse and direct radiation in models of global primary production, and studies of the roles of clouds and aerosols in global carbon cycle.

Published 29 March 2002.

Citation: Gu, L., D. Baldocchi, S. B. Verma, T. A. Black, T. Vesala, E. M. Falge, and P. R. Dowty (2002), Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D6), 4050, doi:10.1029/2001JD001242.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...