Connotea
CiteULike
del.ico.us
BibSonomyAbstract
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 108,
1034,
8 PP., 2003
doi:10.1029/2002JA009540
Quenching rate coefficients for O+(2P) derived from middle ultraviolet airglow
E.O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
E.O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
E.O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
E.O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Code 321SR Office of Naval Research, Arlington, Virginia, USA
O+(2P) is produced in the sunlit thermosphere primarily by photoionization of atomic oxygen. Thermospheric atomic oxygen concentrations can be inferred from measurements of airglow produced near 732.0 nm by the transition of this excited state to the 2D state and at 247.0 nm by the transition to the 4S ground state. The accuracy of these concentrations depends on the accuracy of the important chemical reaction rates used in the airglow model, including quenching of O+(2P). We obtain coefficients for the quenching of O+(2P) by O and N2 by modeling rocket and satellite limb measurements of thermospheric middle ultraviolet (MUV) airglow at 247.0 nm. We derive a reaction rate for N2 of 1.8 × 10−10 cm3 s−1, which is lower than the value obtained by other airglow studies but in agreement with laboratory measurements. We obtain a best fit value for the O reaction rate of 5.0 × 10−11 cm3 s−1, with an upper limit of 8.4 × 10−11 cm3 s−1. The value of the O reaction rate determined by fits to 172 altitude profiles of the 247.0 nm emission shows a strong correlation with the magnitude of the excitation g factor. However, the airglow profile above 260 km favors the upper limit we have identified.
Published 24 January 2003.
Citation: (2003), Quenching rate coefficients for O+(2P) derived from middle ultraviolet airglow, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A1), 1034, doi:10.1029/2002JA009540.
Cited By