|
Read Full Article (file size: 1259334 bytes) Cited by
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 108, NO. D13,
4388,
doi:10.1029/2002JD002393,
2003
A yearlong comparison of plot-scale and satellite footprint-scale 19 and 37 GHz brightness of the Alaskan North Slope
E. J. Kim
Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
A. W. England
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Abstract
Subpixel heterogeneity remains a key issue in the estimation of land parameters using satellite passive microwave sensors;
the scales of spatial variability on land are typically much smaller than sensor footprints (tens of km). Disaggregation is
a necessary component of any successful assimilation or retrieval scheme attempting to exploit satellite passive microwave
observations to estimate parameters at the local scale. This paper quantifies the similarity between ground-based brightness
and satellite brightness observations at 19 and 37 GHz for Arctic tundra on the North Slope of Alaska, identifying and quantifying
sources of the differences. To the extent that this very homogeneous area represents a limiting case, the impact of subpixel
heterogeneity in less homogeneous areas may be gauged. The ground-based radiobrightness observations were collected during
the Radiobrightness Energy Balance Experiment 3 (REBEX-3) conducted on the North Slope in 1994–1995. A comparison was made
of 381 days of brightness observations from a tower-mounted Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) simulator representing
the full range of annual conditions with coincident satellite SSM/I observations. Issues such as instrument stability, the
effects of atmospheric radiative transfer, and consistency of satellite pixel locations are considered. Linear correlations
between tower-based and SSM/I brightness observations of 0.93, 0.94, 0.93, and 0.92 were observed for the 19V, 19H, 37V, and
37H channels, respectively. Footprint sizes were 2 × 4 m for the tower-based observations and 43 × 69 km for the resampled
SSM/I observations. Atmospheric, topographic, and time-of-observation effects can account for the differences between the
best fit lines and the 1:1 lines, with calibration errors accounting for the residual differences.
Received 28
March
2002;
accepted 24
February
2003;
published 10
July
2003.
Index Terms: 1823 Hydrology: Frozen ground; 1863 Hydrology: Snow and ice (1827); 3360 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Remote sensing; 6969 Radio Science: Remote sensing; 9315 Information Related to Geographic Region: Arctic region.
Read Full Article (file size: 1259334 bytes) Cited by
Citation: Kim, E. J., and A. W. England
(2003),
A yearlong comparison of plot-scale and satellite footprint-scale 19 and 37 GHz brightness of the Alaskan North Slope,
J. Geophys. Res.,
108(D13),
4388,
doi:10.1029/2002JD002393.
Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.
|