Read Full Article (file size: 414630 bytes)    Cited by

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 39, NO. 8, 1209, doi:10.1029/2002WR001782, 2003

A comparison of modeled, remotely sensed, and measured snow water equivalent in the northern Great Plains

Thomas L. Mote

Climatology Research Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

Andrew J. Grundstein

Climatology Research Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

Daniel J. Leathers

Center for Climatic Research, Department of Geography, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

David A. Robinson

Department of Geography, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA

Abstract

Various methods are available to measure or estimate the quantity of water present in a snowpack. Historically, the National Weather Service has relied on direct measurements taken at first order and cooperative weather stations. Because of the great spatial variability in snow cover density, point measurements are often of limited utility in identifying snow water equivalent (SWE) values over a given area or watershed. Increasingly, remote sensing techniques and physical models have been used to supplement point measurements of SWE and to improve areal estimates of snow water equivalent. This paper compares daily first-order SWE observations from five stations across the northern Great Plains with those estimated from passive microwave remotely sensed data and from an energy and mass balance model (SNTHERM). A commonly utilized SWE algorithm is applied to Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) data across the northern Great Plains during the 1990s. Various filtering algorithms are applied to eliminate those situations in which the SSM/I SWE algorithms are known to be ineffectual. Airborne gamma estimates are also included in the comparison but are limited to only a few observations a year. Although the modeled SWE is generally in good agreement with the observed SWE, there is a tendency for the SNTHERM model to underestimate SWE, but it is typically within the margin of error of the observations. The microwave SWE algorithm apparently overestimates SWE significantly late in the season, compared to in situ observations, likely a result of snow grain growth during snow metamorphism.

Received 17 October 2002; accepted 25 April 2003; published 13 August 2003.

Index Terms: 1863 Hydrology: Snow and ice (1827); 1640 Global Change: Remote sensing; 1878 Hydrology: Water/energy interactions.

Read Full Article (file size: 414630 bytes)    Cited by

Citation: Mote, T. L., A. J. Grundstein, D. J. Leathers, and D. A. Robinson (2003), A comparison of modeled, remotely sensed, and measured snow water equivalent in the northern Great Plains, Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1209, doi:10.1029/2002WR001782.

Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.