American Geophysical Union Become an AGU Member
Subscribe to AGU Journals		 AGU Home AGU Publications

Read Full Article (file size: 650049 bytes)    Cited by

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 30, NO. 18, 1918, doi:10.1029/2003GL017433, 2003

The impact of varying atmospheric forcing on the thickness of arctic multi-year sea ice

J. A. Dumas

School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Canada


G. M. Flato

Canadian Center for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Victoria, Canada


A. J. Weaver

School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Canada


Abstract

A 1-D thermodynamic sea ice model, forced with North Pole Drift Station observations from 1954–91, is used to study the effect of changing atmospheric forcing on multi-year Arctic sea ice. From 1954–70, most seasons show positive trends in calculated sea ice thickness over much of the Arctic. A dip in calculated ice thickness takes place between 1971–77 over most of the Arctic. Following the North Pacific regime shift in 1976–1977, the period 1978–91 reveals large negative trends in calculated sea ice thickness in all seasons. The results indicate that an important part of the variability and trends in Arctic sea ice thickness is thermodynamically-driven. Of the total variance in multi-year sea ice thickness, 10 to 20% is explained by variations in the Arctic Oscillation and Pacific North American patterns. The multi-year ice thickness response to a positive wintertime Arctic Oscillation anomaly occurs the following summer and persists for more than a year.

Received 28 March 2003; accepted 29 July 2003; published 16 September 2003.

Index Terms: 9315 Information Related to Geographic Region: Arctic region; 4540 Oceanography: Physical: Ice mechanics and air/sea/ice exchange processes; 1610 Global Change: Atmosphere (0315, 0325).

Read Full Article (file size: 650049 bytes)    Cited by

Citation: Dumas, J. A., G. M. Flato, and A. J. Weaver (2003), The impact of varying atmospheric forcing on the thickness of arctic multi-year sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(18), 1918, doi:10.1029/2003GL017433.