|
Subscriber Access to Full Article (Nonsubscribers may purchase for $9.00, Includes print PDF, file size: 835899 bytes)
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 109,
D02S05,
doi:10.1029/2002JD003035,
2004
Airglow emissions and oxygen mixing ratios from the photometer experiment on the Turbulent Oxygen Mixing Experiment (TOMEX)
J. H. Hecht
Space Science Applications Laboratory, The Aerospace Corporation, Los Angeles, California, USA
A. Z. Liu
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA
R. L. Walterscheid
Space Science Applications Laboratory, The Aerospace Corporation, Los Angeles, California, USA
R. G. Roble
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
M. F. Larsen
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
J. H. Clemmons
Space Science Applications Laboratory, The Aerospace Corporation, Los Angeles, California, USA
Abstract
The Turbulent Oxygen Mixing Experiment (TOMEX) combined Na lidar measurements from Starfire Optical Range in Albuquerque,
New Mexico, with a launch of a payload from White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), located a little over 100 km from Starfire.
The payload included a trmethyl aluminum release to measure winds and diffusion, a 5-channel ionization gauge to measure neutral
densities, and a 3-channel photometer experiment to measure atomic oxygen related airglow. The payload was launched at 0957
UT on 26 October 2000 and successfully obtained data from all the experiments. The photometer experiment consisted of three
liquid nitrogen cooled filter photometers which measured emission from the O2 atmospheric band (0, 0) emission, the OH Meinel
(9, 4) band, and the OI(557.7 nm) greenline. Measurements were made as the rocket went from 80 to 110 km on the upleg. The
pointing of the photometers was within a few degrees of zenith. Differentiating these data allowed volume emission rates to
be derived which can be inverted to form atomic oxygen density profiles. The interpretation of the data made use of simultaneous
atmospheric temperature data from the Na lidar. The airglow data showed lower brightness values and lower peak altitudes for
the O2 atmospheric (0, 0) band and OI(557.7 nm) emissions than predicted by the thermosphere/ionosphere/mesopshere/electrodynamics
general circulation (TIME-GCM) model. The peak altitude of the OH Meinel emission seemed nominal. Inverting the O2 atmospheric
(0, 0) and OI(557.7 nm) data following
McDade et al. [1986]
produced O density profiles whose peak densities and peak altitudes are lower than the model values. The shape of the O density
profile is also more constant with altitude than model predictions. The O mixing ratio shows a more altitude-independent profile
than given by the model, especially between 85 and 95 km. Significant deviations in the measured shape of the mixing ratio
also occur at 90, 97, and 102 km. The interpretation of these data is that the O mixing ratio was significantly perturbed
by the passage of an atmospheric gravity wave or tide and the subsequent convective or dynamical instabilities produced by
that wave. Dynamically or convectively unstable layers at 90, 97, and 102 km at the time of the launch also appear to be reflected
in the mixing ratio data.
Received 10
October
2002;
accepted 17
July
2003;
published 23
January
2004.
Index Terms: 0310 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Airglow and aurora; 0340 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Middle atmosphere—composition and chemistry; 3332 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Mesospheric dynamics; 3379 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Turbulence; 3384 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Waves and tides.
Subscriber Access to Full Article (Nonsubscribers may purchase for $9.00, Includes print PDF, file size: 835899 bytes)
Citation: Hecht, J. H., A. Z. Liu, R. L. Walterscheid, R. G. Roble, M. F. Larsen, and J. H. Clemmons
(2004),
Airglow emissions and oxygen mixing ratios from the photometer experiment on the Turbulent Oxygen Mixing Experiment (TOMEX),
J. Geophys. Res.,
109,
D02S05,
doi:10.1029/2002JD003035.
Copyright 2004 by the American Geophysical Union.
|