|
Read Full Article (file size: 452613 bytes) Cited by
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS,
VOL. 32,
L09702,
doi:10.1029/2004GL022241,
2005
Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptions
D. J. Frame
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
B. B. B. Booth
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
J. A. Kettleborough
Space Science and Technology Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, UK
D. A. Stainforth
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
J. M. Gregory
NCAS Centre for Global Atmospheric Modelling, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
M. Collins
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office, Exeter, UK
M. R. Allen
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Abstract
Any attempt to estimate climate sensitivity using observations requires a set of models or model-versions that simultaneously
predict both climate sensitivity and some observable quantity(-ies) given a range of values of unknown climate system properties,
represented by choices of parameters, subsystems or even entire models. The choices researchers make with respect to these
unknown properties play a crucial role in conditioning their climate forecasts. We show that any probabilistic estimate of
climate sensitivity, and hence of the risk that a given greenhouse gas stabilisation level might result in a “dangerous” equilibrium
warming, is critically dependent on subjective prior assumptions of the investigators, not simply on constraints provided
by actual climate observations. This apparent arbitrariness can be resolved by focussing on the intended purpose of the forecast:
while uncertainty in long-term equilibrium warming remains high, an objectively determined 10–90% (5–95%) range of uncertainty
in climate sensitivity that is relevant to forecasts of 21st century transient warming under nearly all current emission scenarios
is 1.4–4.1°C with a median of 2.4°C, in good agreement with the “traditional” range.
Received 14
December
2004;
accepted 8
March
2005;
published 6
May
2005.
Index Terms: 3305 Atmospheric Processes: Climate change and variability (1616, 1635, 3309, 4215, 4513); 3245 Mathematical Geophysics: Probabilistic forecasting (3238); 3275 Mathematical Geophysics: Uncertainty quantification (1873); 1626 Global Change: Global climate models (3337, 4928).
Read Full Article (file size: 452613 bytes) Cited by
Citation: Frame, D. J., B. B. B. Booth, J. A. Kettleborough, D. A. Stainforth, J. M. Gregory, M. Collins, and M. R. Allen
(2005),
Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptions,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32,
L09702,
doi:10.1029/2004GL022241.
Copyright 2005 by the American Geophysical Union.
|