FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Geophysical Research Letters

 

Index Terms

  • Atmospheric Processes: Climate change and variability
  • Mathematical Geophysics: Probabilistic forecasting
  • Mathematical Geophysics: Uncertainty quantification
  • Global Change: Global climate models

Abstract

Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptions

D. J. Frame

Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

B. B. B. Booth

Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

J. A. Kettleborough

Space Science and Technology Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, UK

D. A. Stainforth

Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

J. M. Gregory

NCAS Centre for Global Atmospheric Modelling, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK

M. Collins

Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office, Exeter, UK

M. R. Allen

Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Any attempt to estimate climate sensitivity using observations requires a set of models or model-versions that simultaneously predict both climate sensitivity and some observable quantity(-ies) given a range of values of unknown climate system properties, represented by choices of parameters, subsystems or even entire models. The choices researchers make with respect to these unknown properties play a crucial role in conditioning their climate forecasts. We show that any probabilistic estimate of climate sensitivity, and hence of the risk that a given greenhouse gas stabilisation level might result in a “dangerous” equilibrium warming, is critically dependent on subjective prior assumptions of the investigators, not simply on constraints provided by actual climate observations. This apparent arbitrariness can be resolved by focussing on the intended purpose of the forecast: while uncertainty in long-term equilibrium warming remains high, an objectively determined 10–90% (5–95%) range of uncertainty in climate sensitivity that is relevant to forecasts of 21st century transient warming under nearly all current emission scenarios is 1.4–4.1°C with a median of 2.4°C, in good agreement with the “traditional” range.

Received 14 December 2004; accepted 8 March 2005; published 6 May 2005.

Citation: Frame, D. J., B. B. B. Booth, J. A. Kettleborough, D. A. Stainforth, J. M. Gregory, M. Collins, and M. R. Allen (2005), Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L09702, doi:10.1029/2004GL022241.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...