FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Geophysical Research Letters

 

Index Terms

  • Cryosphere: Ice shelves
  • Cryosphere: Icebergs
  • Cryosphere: Instruments and techniques
  • Cryosphere: Modeling

Abstract

ICESat profiles of tabular iceberg margins and iceberg breakup at low latitudes

Ted Scambos

National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Olga Sergienko

Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Aitbala Sargent

Quaternary Institute and Computer Sciences Department, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA

Douglas MacAyeal

Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Jim Fastook

Quaternary Institute and Computer Sciences Department, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA

ICESat elevation profiles of tabular iceberg margins and the Ronne Ice Shelf edge reveal shapes indicative of two types of bending forces. Icebergs and shelf fronts in sea-ice-covered areas have broad (∼1000 m wide), rounded, ∼0.6 m high ‘berms’ and outer edges that slope down several meters toward the water. Bergs in warmer water have 2 to 5m ‘ramparts’ with ∼1500 m wide edge-parallel ‘moats’ inboard of the edge. This latter pattern was first revealed in images from International Space Station (ISS) showing edge-parallel melt ponds on one iceberg just prior to its disintegration. Model results indicate the patterns are caused by hydrostatic and lithostatic forces acting on the ice face. ‘Berm’ profiles arise from differences between ice and water pressure along the face. ‘Rampart-moat’ profiles result from waterline erosion, creating a submerged bench of ice that lifts the ice edge. We use the results to discuss iceberg breakup at low latitudes.

Received 14 June 2005; accepted 10 October 2005; published 3 November 2005.

Citation: Scambos, T., O. Sergienko, A. Sargent, D. MacAyeal, and J. Fastook (2005), ICESat profiles of tabular iceberg margins and iceberg breakup at low latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L23S09, doi:10.1029/2005GL023802.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...