FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth

 

Keywords

  • Kamchatka
  • interseismic deformation
  • subduction coupling

Index Terms

  • Geodesy and Gravity: Seismic cycle related deformations
  • Geodesy and Gravity: Space geodetic surveys
  • Seismology: Subduction zones
  • Tectonophysics: Dynamics and mechanics of faulting
  • Tectonophysics: Subduction zone processes
Abstract
Cited By (9)
 

Abstract

Interseismic coupling and asperity distribution along the Kamchatka subduction zone

Roland Bürgmann

Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

Mikhail G. Kogan

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York, USA

Grigory M. Steblov

Russian GPS Data Acquisition and Analysis Center, Geophysical Service of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

George Hilley

Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

Vasily E. Levin

KOMSP, Geophysical Service of Russian Academy of Sciences, Petropavlovsk, Russia

Edwin Apel

Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

GPS measurements of interseismic horizontal surface velocities reveal the degree of kinematic coupling of the plate boundary thrust along the Kamchatka subduction zone from about 51° to 57°N latitude. Inversions for the distribution of aseismic slip rate along the ∼15°NW dipping underthrust suggest a nonslipping plate interface in southern Kamchatka above ∼50 km depth, along the segment that ruptured in the M w = 9, 1952 earthquake. North of ∼53°N, the subduction interface experiences significant aseismic slip, consistent with the lower seismic moment release in M ≤ 8.5 earthquakes along this portion of the subduction zone. The GPS velocities are consistent with a boundary element forward model in which historic earthquake rupture zones are represented as locked asperities, surrounded by a zero shear stress subduction interface loaded by plate convergence. Models in which the complete rupture zones of historic earthquakes are considered locked greatly overpredict the degree of kinematic coupling. Reducing the area of the locked model asperities to the central 25% area of historic rupture zones fits the data well, suggesting that large earthquakes involve small fully locked core asperities surrounded by conditionally stable portions of the plate interface. Areas of low aseismic slip rate appear to be roughly correlated with areas of low isostatic gravity anomalies over offshore forearc basins, while less coupled portions of the Kamchatka subduction zone coincide with high-gravity anomalies offshore of two peninsulas, possibly related to the subduction of the Emperor-Meji seamount chain and the Kruzenstern fracture zone.

Received 27 January 2005; accepted 6 April 2005; published 19 July 2005.

Citation: Bürgmann, R., M. G. Kogan, G. M. Steblov, G. Hilley, V. E. Levin, and E. Apel (2005), Interseismic coupling and asperity distribution along the Kamchatka subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B07405, doi:10.1029/2005JB003648.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...