|
Read Full Article (file size: 278345 bytes) Cited by
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 111,
B02303,
doi:10.1029/2005JB003728,
2006
Radial anisotropy in seismic reference models of the mantle
C. Beghein
Department of Earth, Planetary and Atmospheric Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
USA
J. Trampert
Department of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
H. J. van Heijst
Shell International Exploration and Production, Rijkswijk, Netherlands
Abstract
Sambridge's Neighborhood Algorithm was applied to normal mode and surface wave phase velocity data to determine the likelihood
of radial anisotropy in mantle reference models. This full model space search technique provides probability density functions
for each model parameter and therefore reliable estimates of resolution and uncertainty, without having to introduce unnecessary
regularization on the model space. Our results for shear wave anisotropy (described by parameter ξ) show a fast decrease with
depth with no significant deviation from Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM) at any depth. The data do not require strong
deviations from PREM for P wave anisotropy either, except between 220 and 400 km depth and in the D″ layer. The intermediate parameter η might depart
from PREM between 220 and 670 km depth. This implies a likely deeper P wave anisotropy and η anisotropy than S wave anisotropy. The sign change in the anisotropic parameters across the 670-km discontinuity found by other authors is
not warranted by our data set, which is far more extensive than in previous studies. We found that density needs to be well
resolved because we observe a high dependence of the results for P wave-related parameters on the presence or absence of density in the parameterization. S wave anisotropy and η are less affected by density. A well-resolved negative density anomaly was found in the uppermost mantle,
and a density excess was observed in the transition zone and the lowermost mantle which might be a seismic signature of the
recently identified postperovskite phase.
Received 10
March
2005;
accepted 17
November
2005;
published 9
February
2006.
Keywords: anisotropy;
reference mantle model;
model space search.
Index Terms: 3275 Mathematical Geophysics: Uncertainty quantification (1873); 7208 Seismology: Mantle (1212, 1213, 8124); 7255 Seismology: Surface waves and free oscillations; 7270 Seismology: Tomography (6982, 8180); 7290 Seismology: Computational seismology.
Read Full Article (file size: 278345 bytes) Cited by
Citation: Beghein, C., J. Trampert, and H. J. van Heijst
(2006),
Radial anisotropy in seismic reference models of the mantle,
J. Geophys. Res.,
111,
B02303,
doi:10.1029/2005JB003728.
Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.
|