FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

G-Cubed: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems; an electronic journal of the Earth sciences

 

Keywords

  • planktic foraminifera
  • preservation
  • diagenesis
  • Eocene
  • stable isotopes
  • Mg/Ca

Index Terms

  • Biogeosciences: Biomineralization
  • Geochemistry: Major and trace element geochemistry
  • Geochemistry: Stable isotope geochemistry
Abstract
Cited By (14)
 

Abstract

Microstructural and geochemical perspectives on planktic foraminiferal preservation: “Glassy” versus “Frosty”

Philip F. Sexton

National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, School of Ocean and Earth Science, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.

Paul A. Wilson

National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, School of Ocean and Earth Science, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.

Paul N. Pearson

School of Earth, Ocean and Planetary Sciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3YE, U.K.

In recent years it has become apparent that the “cool tropic paradox” of Paleogene and Cretaceous “greenhouse” climates arises because of the diagenetic alteration of tropical planktic foraminiferal calcite near the seafloor, yielding artificially high δ 18O values. Because the Mg/Ca compositions of foraminiferal and inorganic calcite are thought to be quite different, Mg/Ca measurements should be a sensitive way of monitoring diagenetic alteration. Here we examine the extent of diagenetic alteration of Eocene planktic foraminiferal calcite using scanning electron microscope imaging of foraminiferal test microstructures and geochemical (δ 18O and Mg/Ca) analyses. We compare microstructural and geochemical characteristics between given species exhibiting two contrasting states of preservation: those that appear “frosty” under reflected light and those that appear “glassy.” Microstructural evidence reveals extensive diagenetic alteration of frosty foraminiferal tests at the micron scale, while δ 18O analyses document consistently higher δ 18O (and therefore lower paleotemperatures) in this material. Yet we find that δ 18O offsets between species in these frosty foraminiferal assemblages appear to be generally preserved, suggesting that frosty foraminifera remain valuable for generating relatively short (approximately ≤1 Myr) paleoceanographic time series that do not demand absolute estimates of paleotemperature. We also find that the observed increase in Mg/Ca for planktic foraminifera exhibiting diagenetic alteration (compared to glassy taphonomies) is far smaller than would be expected from the addition of inorganic calcite based on laboratory-derived Mg2+ partition coefficients. Our findings imply that a much lower Mg2+ partition coefficient controls inorganic calcite formation in deep sea sedimentary sections, in accordance with the findings of Baker et al. (1982).

Received 1 March 2006; accepted 8 September 2006; published 5 December 2006.

Citation: Sexton, P. F., P. A. Wilson, and P. N. Pearson (2006), Microstructural and geochemical perspectives on planktic foraminiferal preservation: “Glassy” versus “Frosty”, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 7, Q12P19, doi:10.1029/2006GC001291.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...