FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Journal of Geophysical Research, Space Physics

 

Keywords

  • drift model
  • magnetic storm
  • ring current

Index Terms

  • Magnetospheric Physics: Magnetic storms and substorms
  • Magnetospheric Physics: Plasma convection
  • Magnetospheric Physics: Ring current
  • Magnetospheric Physics: Numerical modeling
Abstract
Cited By (11)
 

Abstract

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111, A11S08, 15 PP., 2006
doi:10.1029/2006JA011609

Evolution of the proton ring current energy distribution during 21–25 April 2001 storm

N. Y. Ganushkina

Finnish Meteorological Institute, Space Research Division, Helsinki, Finland

T. I. Pulkkinen

Finnish Meteorological Institute, Space Research Division, Helsinki, Finland

A. Milillo

Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario, Rome, Italy

M. Liemohn

Space Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Three ring current models are used to follow the evolution of the proton ring current during the 2001-04-21–25 storm: The ring current model combined with tracing particles numerically in the drift approximation by Ganushkina et al. (2005), the empirical model of proton fluxes in the inner magnetosphere developed by Milillo et al. (2003), and the kinetic ring current-atmosphere interaction model (RAM) by Liemohn et al. (2001). The paper focuses on the effects of the electric and magnetic field models and initial particle distributions on the final energy distribution. We examine a variety of large-scale magnetic field and convection electric field models as well as substorm-associated, smaller-scale, and time-varying electric fields. We find that (1) using more realistic magnetic field models leads to reduction of the ring current energy content by ∼30%; (2) details of the global convection field have little influence on the overall ring current evolution; (3) smaller-scale impulsive electric field have profound effects on the ring current evolution, particularly with regard to the acceleration of the higher-energy particles; and (4) in the ring current models, the choice of the initial and boundary conditions have significant effects on the modeled ring current intensity and energy spectrum.

Received 11 January 2006; accepted 14 August 2006; published 11 October 2006.

Citation: Ganushkina, N. Y., T. I. Pulkkinen, A. Milillo, and M. Liemohn (2006), Evolution of the proton ring current energy distribution during 21–25 April 2001 storm, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A11S08, doi:10.1029/2006JA011609.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...