|
Read Full Article (file size: 2148439 bytes) Cited by
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 111,
B12305,
doi:10.1029/2006JB004415,
2006
M ≥ 7.0 earthquake recurrence on the San Andreas fault from a stress renewal model
Tom Parsons
U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, USA
Abstract
Forecasting M ≥ 7.0 San Andreas fault earthquakes requires an assessment of their expected frequency. I used a three-dimensional finite
element model of California to calculate volumetric static stress drops from scenario M ≥ 7.0 earthquakes on three San Andreas fault sections. The ratio of stress drop to tectonic stressing rate derived from geodetic
displacements yielded recovery times at points throughout the model volume. Under a renewal model, stress recovery times on
ruptured fault planes can be a proxy for earthquake recurrence. I show curves of magnitude versus stress recovery time for
three San Andreas fault sections. When stress recovery times were converted to expected M ≥ 7.0 earthquake frequencies, they fit Gutenberg-Richter relationships well matched to observed regional rates of M ≤ 6.0 earthquakes. Thus a stress-balanced model permits large earthquake Gutenberg-Richter behavior on an individual fault
segment, though it does not require it. Modeled slip magnitudes and their expected frequencies were consistent with those
observed at the Wrightwood paleoseismic site if strict time predictability does not apply to the San Andreas fault.
Received 28
March
2006;
accepted 22
August
2006;
published 19
December
2006.
Keywords: earthquake recurrence;
San Andreas fault;
finite element model.
Index Terms: 7223 Seismology: Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction (1217, 1242); 7230 Seismology: Seismicity and tectonics (1207, 1217, 1240, 1242); 7250 Seismology: Transform faults; 8106 Tectonophysics: Continental margins: transform; 8164 Tectonophysics: Stresses: crust and lithosphere.
Read Full Article (file size: 2148439 bytes) Cited by
Citation: Parsons, T.
(2006),
M ≥ 7.0 earthquake recurrence on the San Andreas fault from a stress renewal model,
J. Geophys. Res.,
111,
B12305,
doi:10.1029/2006JB004415.
Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.
|