FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmospheres

 

Keywords

  • land cover
  • ISLSCP II
  • remote sensing

Index Terms

  • Biogeosciences: Data sets
  • Biogeosciences: Ecosystems, structure and dynamics
  • Biogeosciences: Remote sensing
Abstract
Cited By (3)
 

Abstract

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111, D22S07, 12 PP., 2006
doi:10.1029/2006JD007453

Evaluation of ISLSCP Initiative II satellite-based land cover data sets and assessment of progress in land cover data for global modeling

Eric C. Brown de Colstoun

Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Biospheric Sciences Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

Ruth S. DeFries

Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

John R. G. Townshend

Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

As an important component of the International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Initiative II data collection, eight state-of-the-art land cover/use data sets have been compiled and made consistent with the ISLSCP Initiative II land/water mask in support of global modeling efforts. These data sets contain new and improved global data sets at coarse resolutions (1/4, 1/2 and 1°) describing historical, recent and present land cover conditions and are a testament to the tremendous progress made in this area over the past decade. In addition to the historical data, data describing the subcell heterogeneity in land cover are also provided, both in terms of subcell proportions of land cover classes and vegetation continuous fields such as % tree, grass and bare cover. Here we present the various ISLSCPII land cover data sets and compare the principal satellite-derived data sets and the effect of their respective aggregation methods. We find that despite some notable disagreements among similar classes, the satellite-based data sets agree remarkably well over large portions of the Earth's surface (over 50% for all resolutions). We also find that the methods of aggregation, whether done by a strictly dominant type, or using more information on subcell tree cover, can have an important impact on the final output and need to be considered by the user. Finally, by integrating the vegetation continuous fields data into our analyses we are able to show that the principal differences in terms of discrete land cover classes are in fact transition zones between similar classes.

Received 28 April 2006; accepted 10 October 2006; published 15 November 2006.

Citation: Brown de Colstoun, E. C., R. S. DeFries, and J. R. G. Townshend (2006), Evaluation of ISLSCP Initiative II satellite-based land cover data sets and assessment of progress in land cover data for global modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D22S07, doi:10.1029/2006JD007453.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...