|
Subscriber Access to Full Article (Nonsubscribers may purchase for $9.00, Includes print PDF, file size: 597182 bytes)
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 112,
D11118,
doi:10.1029/2006JD008088,
2007
Detection, attribution, and sensitivity of trends toward earlier streamflow in the Sierra Nevada
E. P. Maurer
Civil Engineering Department, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA
I. T. Stewart
Environmental Studies Program, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA
C. Bonfils
School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, California, USA
P. B. Duffy
School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, California, USA
D. Cayan
Climate Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California,
USA
Abstract
Observed changes in the timing of snowmelt dominated streamflow in the western United States are often linked to anthropogenic
or other external causes. We assess whether observed streamflow timing changes can be statistically attributed to external
forcing, or whether they still lie within the bounds of natural (internal) variability for four large Sierra Nevada (CA) basins,
at inflow points to major reservoirs. Streamflow timing is measured by “center timing” (CT), the day when half the annual
flow has passed a given point. We use a physically based hydrology model driven by meteorological input from a global climate
model to quantify the natural variability in CT trends. Estimated 50-year trends in CT due to natural climate variability
often exceed estimated actual CT trends from 1950 to 1999. Thus, although observed trends in CT to date may be statistically
significant, they cannot yet be statistically attributed to external influences on climate. We estimate that projected CT
changes at the four major reservoir inflows will, with 90% confidence, exceed those from natural variability within 1–4 decades
or 4–8 decades, depending on rates of future greenhouse gas emissions. To identify areas most likely to exhibit CT changes
in response to rising temperatures, we calculate changes in CT under temperature increases from 1 to 5°. We find that areas
with average winter temperatures between −2°C and −4°C are most likely to respond with significant CT shifts. Correspondingly,
elevations from 2000 to 2800 m are most sensitive to temperature increases, with CT changes exceeding 45 days (earlier) relative
to 1961–1990.
Received 29
September
2006;
accepted 30
March
2007;
published 13
June
2007.
Keywords: streamflow;
snowmelt;
runoff.
Index Terms: 1807 Hydrology: Climate impacts; 1863 Hydrology: Snow and ice (0736, 0738, 0776, 1827); 1860 Hydrology: Streamflow; 1630 Global Change: Impacts of global change (1225); 1621 Global Change: Cryospheric change (0776).
Subscriber Access to Full Article (Nonsubscribers may purchase for $9.00, Includes print PDF, file size: 597182 bytes)
Citation: Maurer, E. P., I. T. Stewart, C. Bonfils, P. B. Duffy, and D. Cayan
(2007),
Detection, attribution, and sensitivity of trends toward earlier streamflow in the Sierra Nevada,
J. Geophys. Res.,
112,
D11118,
doi:10.1029/2006JD008088.
Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.
|