|
Read Full Article (file size: 2130140 bytes) Cited by
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 112,
D02304,
doi:10.1029/2006JD007268,
2007
Satellite chartography of atmospheric methane from SCIAMACHY on board ENVISAT: 2. Evaluation based on inverse model simulations
P. Bergamaschi
European Commission - DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy
C. Frankenberg
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
J. F. Meirink
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, Netherlands Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
M. Krol
European Commission - DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
F. Dentener
European Commission - DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy
T. Wagner
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
U. Platt
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
J. O. Kaplan
European Commission - DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy
S. Körner
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
M. Heimann
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
E. J. Dlugokencky
Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, USA
A. Goede
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, Netherlands
Abstract
We extend the analysis of a global CH4 data set retrieved from SCIAMACHY (Frankenberg et al., 2006) by making a detailed comparison with inverse TM5 model simulations
for 2003 that are optimized versus high accuracy CH4 surface measurements from the NOAA ESRL network. The comparison of column averaged mixing ratios over remote continental
and oceanic regions shows that major features of the atmospheric CH4 distribution are consistent between SCIAMACHY observations and model simulations. However, the analysis suggests that SCIAMACHY
CH4 retrievals may have some bias that depends on latitude and season (up to ∼30 ppb). Large enhancements of column averaged
CH4 mixing ratios (∼50–100 ppb) are observed and modeled over India, Southeast Asia, and the tropical regions of South America,
and Africa. We present a detailed comparison of observed spatial patterns and their seasonal evolution with TM5 1° × 1° zoom
simulations over these regions. Application of a new wetland inventory leads to a significant improvement in the agreement
between SCIAMACHY retrievals and model simulations over the Amazon basin during the first half of the year. Furthermore, we
present an initial coupled inversion that simultaneously uses the surface and satellite observations and that allows the inverse
system to compensate for the potential systematic bias. The results suggest significantly greater tropical emissions compared
to either the a priori estimates or the inversion based on the surface measurements only. Emissions from rice paddies in India
and Southeast Asia are relatively well constrained by the SCIAMACHY data and are slightly reduced by the inversion.
Received 7
March
2006;
accepted 18
August
2006;
published 24
January
2007.
Keywords: atmospheric CH4;
inverse modeling;
SCIAMACHY.
Index Terms: 0322 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Constituent sources and sinks; 0315 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Biosphere/atmosphere interactions (0426, 1610); 0365 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Troposphere: composition and chemistry; 0368 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Troposphere: constituent transport and chemistry; 0394 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Instruments and techniques.
Read Full Article (file size: 2130140 bytes) Cited by
Citation: Bergamaschi, P., et al.
(2007),
Satellite chartography of atmospheric methane from SCIAMACHY on board ENVISAT: 2. Evaluation based on inverse model simulations,
J. Geophys. Res.,
112,
D02304,
doi:10.1029/2006JD007268.
Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.
|