|
Read Full Article (file size: 1847027 bytes) Cited by
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 112,
D10314,
doi:10.1029/2006JD007659,
2007
Precision requirements for space-based XCO2 data
C. E. Miller
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
D. Crisp
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
P. L. DeCola
Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA
S. C. Olsen
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
J. T. Randerson
Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
A. M. Michalak
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
A. Alkhaled
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
P. Rayner
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
D. J. Jacob
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
P. Suntharalingam
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
D. B. A. Jones
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
A. S. Denning
Atmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
M. E. Nicholls
Atmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
S. C. Doney
Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA
S. Pawson
Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Code 610.1, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
H. Boesch
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
B. J. Connor
Atmospheric Research, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Central Otago, Omakau, New Zealand
I. Y. Fung
Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
D. O'Brien
Atmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
R. J. Salawitch
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
S. P. Sander
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
B. Sen
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
P. Tans
Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division, NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, USA
G. C. Toon
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
P. O. Wennberg
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
S. C. Wofsy
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Y. L. Yung
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
R. M. Law
CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
Abstract
Precision requirements are determined for space-based column-averaged CO2 dry air mole fraction (X CO2 ) data. These requirements result from an assessment of spatial and temporal gradients in X CO2 , the relationship between X CO2 precision and surface CO2 flux uncertainties inferred from inversions of the X CO2 data, and the effects of X CO2 biases on the fidelity of CO2 flux inversions. Observational system simulation experiments and synthesis inversion modeling demonstrate that the Orbiting
Carbon Observatory mission design and sampling strategy provide the means to achieve these X CO2 data precision requirements.
Received 15
June
2006;
accepted 11
January
2007;
published 26
May
2007.
Index Terms: 0428 Biogeosciences: Carbon cycling (4806); 0490 Biogeosciences: Trace gases; 0365 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Troposphere: composition and chemistry; 1610 Global Change: Atmosphere (0315, 0325); 1640 Global Change: Remote sensing (1855).
Read Full Article (file size: 1847027 bytes) Cited by
Citation: Miller, C. E., et al.
(2007),
Precision requirements for space-based XCO2 data,
J. Geophys. Res.,
112,
D10314,
doi:10.1029/2006JD007659.
Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.
|