American Geophysical Union Become an AGU Member
Subscribe to AGU Journals
AGU Home AGU Publications

Read Full Article (file size: 1847027 bytes)    Cited by

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112, D10314, doi:10.1029/2006JD007659, 2007

Precision requirements for space-based XCO2 data

C. E. Miller

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


D. Crisp

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


P. L. DeCola

Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA


S. C. Olsen

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA


J. T. Randerson

Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA


A. M. Michalak

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA


A. Alkhaled

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA


P. Rayner

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France


D. J. Jacob

Division of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA


P. Suntharalingam

Division of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA


D. B. A. Jones

Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada


A. S. Denning

Atmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA


M. E. Nicholls

Atmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA


S. C. Doney

Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA


S. Pawson

Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Code 610.1, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA


H. Boesch

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


B. J. Connor

Atmospheric Research, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Central Otago, Omakau, New Zealand


I. Y. Fung

Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA


D. O'Brien

Atmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA


R. J. Salawitch

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


S. P. Sander

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


B. Sen

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


P. Tans

Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division, NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, USA


G. C. Toon

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


P. O. Wennberg

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


S. C. Wofsy

Division of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA


Y. L. Yung

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA


R. M. Law

CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia


Abstract

Precision requirements are determined for space-based column-averaged CO2 dry air mole fraction (X CO2 ) data. These requirements result from an assessment of spatial and temporal gradients in X CO2 , the relationship between X CO2 precision and surface CO2 flux uncertainties inferred from inversions of the X CO2 data, and the effects of X CO2 biases on the fidelity of CO2 flux inversions. Observational system simulation experiments and synthesis inversion modeling demonstrate that the Orbiting Carbon Observatory mission design and sampling strategy provide the means to achieve these X CO2 data precision requirements.

Received 15 June 2006; accepted 11 January 2007; published 26 May 2007.

Index Terms: 0428 Biogeosciences: Carbon cycling (4806); 0490 Biogeosciences: Trace gases; 0365 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Troposphere: composition and chemistry; 1610 Global Change: Atmosphere (0315, 0325); 1640 Global Change: Remote sensing (1855).


Read Full Article (file size: 1847027 bytes)    Cited by

Citation: Miller, C. E., et al. (2007), Precision requirements for space-based XCO2 data, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10314, doi:10.1029/2006JD007659.