FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmospheres

 

Keywords

  • atmospheric CO uncertainties
  • biomass burning emissions
  • chemistry transport model
  • GEFD2

Index Terms

  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Troposphere: constituent transport and chemistry
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Biosphere/atmosphere interactions
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Troposphere: composition and chemistry
  • Global Change: Land/atmosphere interactions
Abstract
Cited By (1)
 

Abstract

Sensitivity of global CO simulations to uncertainties in biomass burning sources

H. Bian

Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

M. Chin

Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

S. R. Kawa

Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

B. Duncan

Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

A. Arellano

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

P. Kasibhatla

Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA

One of the largest uncertainties for the modeling of tropospheric carbon monoxide (CO) concentration is the timing, location, and magnitude of biomass burning emissions. We investigate the sensitivity of simulated CO in the Unified Chemistry Transport Model (UCTM) to several biomass burning emissions, including four bottom-up and two top-down inventories. We compare the sensitivity experiments with observations from MOPITT, surface and airborne NOAA Global Monitoring Division network data, and the TRACE-P field campaign. The variation of the global annual emissions of these six biomass burning inventories is within 30%; however, their regional variations are often much higher (factor of 2–5). These uncertainties translate to about 6% variation in the global simulated CO but more than a 100% variation in some regions. The annual mean CO variation is greater in the Southern Hemisphere (>12%) than in the Northern Hemisphere (<5%), largely because biomass burning is a higher percentage of the total source in the Southern Hemisphere. Comparisons with CO observations indicate that each model inventory has its strengths and shortcomings, and these regional variations are examined. Overall the model CO concentrations are within the observed range of variability at most stations including Ascension Island, which is strongly influenced by fire emissions. In addition, we discuss the systematic biases that exist in the inventories developed by the similar methodologies and original satellite data.

Received 22 December 2006; accepted 17 September 2007; published 14 December 2007.

Citation: Bian, H., M. Chin, S. R. Kawa, B. Duncan, A. Arellano, and P. Kasibhatla (2007), Sensitivity of global CO simulations to uncertainties in biomass burning sources, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D23308, doi:10.1029/2006JD008376.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...