FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Water Resources Research

 

Keywords

  • multi-phase
  • interfacial area

Index Terms

  • Hydrology
  • Hydrology: Vadose zone
  • Hydrology: Groundwater transport

Abstract

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 44, W01411, 9 PP., 2008
doi:10.1029/2006WR005517

Synchrotron X-ray microtomography and interfacial partitioning tracer test measurements of NAPL-water interfacial areas

Mark L. Brusseau

Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Hilary Janousek

Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Asami Murao

Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Gregory Schnaar

Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Interfacial areas between an immiscible organic liquid (NAPL), and water were measured for two natural porous media using two methods, aqueous-phase interfacial partitioning tracer tests and synchrotron X-ray microtomography. The interfacial areas measured with the tracer tests were similar to previously reported values obtained with the method. The values were, however, significantly larger than those obtained from microtomography. Analysis of microtomography data collected before and after introduction of the interfacial tracer solution indicated that the surfactant tracer had minimal impact on fluid-phase configuration and interfacial areas under conditions associated with typical laboratory application. The disparity between the tracer test and microtomography values is attributed primarily to the inability of the microtomography method to resolve interfacial area associated with microscopic surface heterogeneity. This hypothesis is consistent with results recently reported for a comparison of microtomographic analysis and interfacial tracer tests conducted for an air-water system. The tracer test method provides a measure of effective, total (capillary and film) interfacial area, whereas microtomography can be used to determine separately both capillary-associated and film-associated interfacial areas. Both methods appear to provide useful information for given applications. A key to their effective use is recognizing the specific nature of the information provided by each, as well as associated limitations.

Received 11 September 2006; accepted 18 September 2007; published 8 January 2008.

Citation: Brusseau, M. L., H. Janousek, A. Murao, and G. Schnaar (2008), Synchrotron X-ray microtomography and interfacial partitioning tracer test measurements of NAPL-water interfacial areas, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01411, doi:10.1029/2006WR005517.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...