|
Read Full Article (file size: 3436610 bytes) Cited by
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 113,
G01021,
doi:10.1029/2007JG000563,
2008
Improvements to the Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cycle
K. W. Oleson
Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
G.-Y. Niu
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Z.-L. Yang
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
D. M. Lawrence
Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
P. E. Thornton
Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
P. J. Lawrence
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
R. Stöckli
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland NASA Earth Observatory, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
R. E. Dickinson
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
G. B. Bonan
Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
S. Levis
Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
A. Dai
Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
T. Qian
Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Abstract
The Community Land Model version 3 (CLM3) is the land component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM). CLM3 has energy
and water biases resulting from deficiencies in some of its canopy and soil parameterizations related to hydrological processes.
Recent research by the community that utilizes CLM3 and the family of CCSM models has indicated several promising approaches
to alleviating these biases. This paper describes the implementation of a selected set of these parameterizations and their
effects on the simulated hydrological cycle. The modifications consist of surface data sets based on Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer products, new parameterizations for canopy integration, canopy interception, frozen soil, soil water availability,
and soil evaporation, a TOPMODEL-based model for surface and subsurface runoff, a groundwater model for determining water
table depth, and the introduction of a factor to simulate nitrogen limitation on plant productivity. The results from a set
of offline simulations were compared with observed data for runoff, river discharge, soil moisture, and total water storage
to assess the performance of the new model (referred to as CLM3.5). CLM3.5 exhibits significant improvements in its partitioning
of global evapotranspiration (ET) which result in wetter soils, less plant water stress, increased transpiration and photosynthesis,
and an improved annual cycle of total water storage. Phase and amplitude of the runoff annual cycle is generally improved.
Dramatic improvements in vegetation biogeography result when CLM3.5 is coupled to a dynamic global vegetation model. Lower
than observed soil moisture variability in the rooting zone is noted as a remaining deficiency.
Received 26
July
2007;
accepted 30
November
2007;
published 12
March
2008.
Keywords: land surface model;
land-atmosphere exchange;
hydrology.
Index Terms: 1847 Hydrology: Modeling; 1626 Global Change: Global climate models (3337, 4928); 0426 Biogeosciences: Biosphere/atmosphere interactions (0315); 1615 Global Change: Biogeochemical cycles, processes, and modeling (0412, 0414, 0793, 4805, 4912); 1631 Global Change: Land/atmosphere interactions (1218, 1843, 3322).
Read Full Article (file size: 3436610 bytes) Cited by
Citation: Oleson, K. W., et al.
(2008),
Improvements to the Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cycle,
J. Geophys. Res.,
113,
G01021,
doi:10.1029/2007JG000563.
Copyright 2008 by the American Geophysical Union.
|