FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Paleoceanography

 

Keywords

  • orbital forcing
  • seasonality
  • paleoclimate modeling

Index Terms

  • Biogeosciences: Paleoclimatology and paleoceanography
  • Paleoceanography: Astronomical forcing
  • Paleoceanography: Global climate models
  • Paleoceanography: Insolation forcing
  • Paleoceanography: Micropaleontology
Abstract
Cited By (0)
 

Abstract

On the definition of seasons in paleoclimate simulations with orbital forcing

Oliver Timm

International Pacific Research Center, SOEST, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Axel Timmermann

International Pacific Research Center, SOEST, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Ayako Abe-Ouchi

Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan

Frontier Research Center for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan

Fuyuki Saito

Frontier Research Center for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan

Tomonori Segawa

Frontier Research Center for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan

Orbital forcing is a major driver of climate variability on timescales of 10,000 to 100,000 years. Changes in the orbital parameters cause variations in the length of the seasons by several days. Consequently, models using a fixed present-day calendar result in biased paleoseasons, especially in boreal autumn when the vernal equinox is used as an anchor point. The bias is estimated for temperatures and precipitation in a transient model simulation over the last 21,000 years and an accelerated simulation over the last 129,000 years. The largest differences of up to 4 K occur over the continents in high latitudes. Precipitation estimates are mostly affected in the low latitudes. The time-dependent bias is large enough to modify the temporal characteristics of temperature and precipitation indices. It is discussed to what extent the bias in one season is distorting comparisons between models and paleoproxies. The bias has minor implications for proxy-model comparisons in general. However, proxies of monsoon activity should be compared with fixed angular seasons. For process studies and climate sensitivity studies the use of fixed angular seasons is imperative.

Received 29 March 2007; accepted 25 March 2008; published 26 June 2008.

Citation: Timm, O., A. Timmermann, A. Abe-Ouchi, F. Saito, and T. Segawa (2008), On the definition of seasons in paleoclimate simulations with orbital forcing, Paleoceanography, 23, PA2221, doi:10.1029/2007PA001461.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...