FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Geophysical Research Letters

 

Keywords

  • black carbon
  • internal mixing

Index Terms

  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Aerosols and particles
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Pollution: urban and regional
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Instruments and techniques
  • Global Change: Atmosphere

Abstract

Measurement of the mixing state, mass, and optical size of individual black carbon particles in urban and biomass burning emissions

J. P. Schwarz

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

R. S. Gao

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

J. R. Spackman

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

L. A. Watts

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

D. S. Thomson

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

D. W. Fahey

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

T. B. Ryerson

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

J. Peischl

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

J. S. Holloway

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

M. Trainer

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

G. J. Frost

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

T. Baynard

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

D. A. Lack

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

J. A. de Gouw

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

C. Warneke

Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

L. A. Del Negro

Department of Chemistry, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA

In situ measurements of the mass, mixing state, and optical size of individual black-carbon (BC) particles in the fine mode (90–600 nm) have been made in fresh emissions from urban and biomass burning sources with an airborne single-particle soot photometer. Contrasts between the two sources are significant and consistent. Urban BC tends to smaller sizes, fewer coated particles, thinner coatings, and less absorption per unit mass than biomass-burning BC. This suggests that urban BC may have a longer lifetime in the atmosphere and a different impact on BC radiative forcing in the first indirect effect than biomass-burning BC. These measurements bound the likely variability in the microphysical state of BC emissions from typical continental processes, and provide direct measurements of the size distribution and coating state of fine-mode BC for use in constraining climate and aerosol models. These results highlight the need for the integration of source-specific information into such models.

Received 12 March 2008; accepted 19 May 2008; published 9 July 2008.

Citation: Schwarz, J. P., et al. (2008), Measurement of the mixing state, mass, and optical size of individual black carbon particles in urban and biomass burning emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L13810, doi:10.1029/2008GL033968.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...