Abstract
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 113,
B11302,
9 PP., 2008
doi:10.1029/2008JB005579
Differences between spontaneous and triggered earthquakes: Their influences on foreshock probabilities
Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan
Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
Institute of Geophysics, School of Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
In this study we investigate the foreshock probabilities calculated from earthquake catalogs from Japan, southern California, and New Zealand. Unlike conventional studies on foreshocks, we use a probability-based declustering method to separate each catalog into stochastic versions of family trees, such that each event is classified as either having been triggered by a preceding event or being a spontaneous event. The probabilities are determined from parameters that provide the best fit of the real catalogue using a space-time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. The model assumes that background and triggered earthquakes have the same magnitude-dependent triggering capability. A foreshock here is defined as a spontaneous event that has one or more larger descendants, and a triggered foreshock is a triggered event that has one or more larger descendants. The proportion of foreshocks in spontaneous events of each catalog is found to be lower than the proportion of triggered foreshocks in triggered events. One possibility is that this is due to different triggering productivity in spontaneous versus triggered events, i.e., a triggered event triggers more children than a spontaneous events of the same magnitude. However, further analysis on simulated data shows that such difference might be caused by the events triggered by smaller events below the magnitude threshold of the catalog. Even if the physical interpretation is unclear, a clustering model where spontaneous events and triggered events have different triggering behaviors can be used to assess the risk of foreshocks, and to avoid overpredicting.
Received 26 December 2007; accepted 1 August 2008; published 6 November 2008.
Citation: (2008), Differences between spontaneous and triggered earthquakes: Their influences on foreshock probabilities, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B11302, doi:10.1029/2008JB005579.
Cited By
