FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Space Weather

 

Keywords

  • space weather
  • CME propagation modeling

Index Terms

  • Interplanetary Physics: Coronal mass ejections
  • Ionosphere: Modeling and forecasting
  • Space Weather: Models
Abstract
Cited By (15)
 

Abstract

SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 7, S03004, 7 PP., 2009
doi:10.1029/2008SW000448

Validation of the coronal mass ejection predictions at the Earth orbit estimated by ENLIL heliosphere cone model

A. Taktakishvili

Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, University of Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

M. Kuznetsova

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

P. MacNeice

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

M. Hesse

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

L. Rastätter

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

A. Pulkkinen

Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, University of Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

A. Chulaki

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

D. Odstrcil

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Modeling is an important tool in understanding physical processes in the space weather. Model performance studies evaluate the quality of model operation by comparing its output to a measurable parameter of interest. In this paper we studied the performance of the combination of the halo coronal mass ejection (CME) analytical cone model and ENLIL three-dimensional MHD heliosphere model. We examined the CME arrival time and magnitude of impact at 1 AU for different geoeffective events, including the October 2003 Halloween Storm and the 14 December 2006 storm CMEs. The results of the simulation are compared with the ACE satellite observations. The comparison of the simulation results with the observations demonstrates that ENLIL cone model performs better compared to reference mean velocity and empirical models.

Received 7 October 2008; accepted 22 January 2009; published 19 March 2009.

Citation: Taktakishvili, A., M. Kuznetsova, P. MacNeice, M. Hesse, L. Rastätter, A. Pulkkinen, A. Chulaki, and D. Odstrcil (2009), Validation of the coronal mass ejection predictions at the Earth orbit estimated by ENLIL heliosphere cone model, Space Weather, 7, S03004, doi:10.1029/2008SW000448.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...