Abstract
Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach‐ and plot‐scale understanding to the catchment scale
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Olympia, Washington, USA
U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, USA
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
The relationship between catchment structure and runoff characteristics is poorly understood. In steep headwater catchments with shallow soils the accumulation of hillslope area (upslope accumulated area (UAA)) is a hypothesized first‐order control on the distribution of soil water and groundwater. Hillslope‐riparian water table connectivity represents the linkage between the dominant catchment landscape elements (hillslopes and riparian zones) and the channel network. Hydrologic connectivity between hillslope‐riparian‐stream (HRS) landscape elements is heterogeneous in space and often temporally transient. We sought to test the relationship between UAA and the existence and longevity of HRS shallow groundwater connectivity. We quantified water table connectivity based on 84 recording wells distributed across 24 HRS transects within the Tenderfoot Creek Experimental Forest (U.S. Forest Service), northern Rocky Mountains, Montana. Correlations were observed between the longevity of HRS water table connectivity and the size of each transect's UAA (r 2 = 0.91). We applied this relationship to the entire stream network to quantify landscape‐scale connectivity through time and ascertain its relationship to catchment‐scale runoff dynamics. We found that the shape of the estimated annual landscape connectivity duration curve was highly related to the catchment flow duration curve (r 2 = 0.95). This research suggests internal catchment landscape structure (topography and topology) as a first‐order control on runoff source area and whole catchment response characteristics.
Received 13 June 2008; accepted 9 February 2009; published 29 April 2009.
Citation: (2009), Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach‐ and plot‐scale understanding to the catchment scale, Water Resour. Res., 45, W04428, doi:10.1029/2008WR007225.
Cited By
