FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Geophysical Research Letters

 

Keywords

  • cosmic rays
  • aerosol nucleation
  • cloud condensation nuclei

Index Terms

  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Aerosols and particles
  • Atmospheric Processes: Clouds and aerosols
  • Global Change: Atmosphere
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Ion chemistry of the atmosphere

Abstract

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 36, L09820, 6 PP., 2009
doi:10.1029/2009GL037946

Can cosmic rays affect cloud condensation nuclei by altering new particle formation rates?

J. R. Pierce

Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

P. J. Adams

Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Although controversial, many observations have suggested that low-level cloud cover correlates with the cosmic ray flux. Because galactic cosmic rays have likely decreased in intensity over the last century, this hypothesis, if true, could partly explain 20th century warming, thereby upsetting the consensus view that greenhouse-gas forcing has caused most of the warming. The “ion-aerosol clear-air” hypothesis suggests that increased cosmic rays cause increases in new-particle formation, cloud condensation nuclei concentrations (CCN), and cloud cover. In this paper, we present the first calculations of the magnitude of the ion-aerosol clear-air mechanism using a general circulation model with online aerosol microphysics. In our simulations, changes in CCN from changes in cosmic rays during a solar cycle are two orders of magnitude too small to account for the observed changes in cloud properties; consequently, we conclude that the hypothesized effect is too small to play a significant role in current climate change.

Received 3 March 2009; accepted 13 April 2009; published 13 May 2009.

Citation: Pierce, J. R., and P. J. Adams (2009), Can cosmic rays affect cloud condensation nuclei by altering new particle formation rates?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L09820, doi:10.1029/2009GL037946.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...