FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Geophysical Research Letters

 

Keywords

  • shoreline change
  • model probability
  • model averaging

Index Terms

  • Global Change: Impacts of global change
  • Biogeosciences: Natural hazards
  • Hydrology: Erosion
  • Oceanography: Physical: Nearshore processes
  • Mathematical Geophysics: Prediction

Abstract

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 36, L20404, 6 PP., 2009
doi:10.1029/2009GL040061

Modeling storms improves estimates of long-term shoreline change

L. Neil Frazer

Department of Geology and Geophysics, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Tiffany R. Anderson

Department of Geology and Geophysics, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Charles H. Fletcher

Department of Geology and Geophysics, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Large storms make it difficult to extract the long-term trend of erosion or accretion from shoreline position data. Here we make storms part of the shoreline change model by means of a storm function. The data determine storm amplitudes and the rate at which the shoreline recovers from storms. Historical shoreline data are temporally sparse, and inclusion of all storms in one model over-fits the data, but a probability-weighted average model shows effects from all storms, illustrating how model averaging incorporates information from good models that might otherwise have been discarded as un-parsimonious. Data from Cotton Patch Hill, DE, yield a long-term shoreline loss rate of 0.49 ± 0.01 m/yr, about 16% less than published estimates. A minimum loss rate of 0.34 ± 0.01 m/yr is given by a model containing the 1929, 1962 and 1992 storms.

Received 14 July 2009; accepted 29 September 2009; published 31 October 2009.

Citation: Frazer, L. N., T. R. Anderson, and C. H. Fletcher (2009), Modeling storms improves estimates of long-term shoreline change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L20404, doi:10.1029/2009GL040061.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...