FastFind »   Lastname: doi:10.1029/ Year: Advanced Search  

AGU: Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmospheres

 

Keywords

  • carbon monoxide
  • MOPITT
  • TES

Index Terms

  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Troposphere: constituent transport and chemistry
  • Biogeosciences: Trace gases
  • Computational Geophysics: Data analysis: algorithms and implementation
  • Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Instruments and techniques
Abstract
Cited By (0)
 

Abstract

A global comparison of carbon monoxide profiles and column amounts from Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) and Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT)

Shu-Peng Ho

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

COSMIC Project Office, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

David P. Edwards

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

John C. Gille

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Ming Luo

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Gregory B. Osterman

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Susan S. Kulawik

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Helen Worden

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

In this study, we compare carbon monoxide (CO) products from the Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) and Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) and investigate the possible causes of the differences between retrievals for these two data sets. Direct comparisons of CO retrievals for July 2006 show that TES CO concentrations are consistently biased lower than those of MOPITT by 25 ppbv near the surface and by 20 ppbv at 150 hPa, primarily due to different a priori profiles and covariance matrices used in the TES and MOPITT CO retrievals. To reduce the effects of different a priori constraints, we apply TES a priori profiles and covariance matrices to a modified MOPITT retrieval algorithm. The mean TES-MOPITT CO difference decreases from −25 to −10 ppbv near the surface. To further account for retrieval smoothing errors due to different TES and MOPITT averaging kernels, TES averaging kernels are used to smooth MOPITT CO profiles to derive TES-equivalent CO profiles. Compared to these, TES CO profiles are biased 1 ppbv lower near the surface and 4–9 ppbv lower in the troposphere, and the mean absolute TES and TES-equivalent CO column difference is less than 6.5%. The mean TES and MOPITT CO differences due to smoothing errors are close to zero, and the remaining bias is primarily due to the combined effects of radiance biases, forward model errors, and the spatial and temporal mismatches of TES and MOPITT pixels.

Received 13 April 2009; accepted 21 August 2009; published 6 November 2009.

Citation: Ho, S.-P., D. P. Edwards, J. C. Gille, M. Luo, G. B. Osterman, S. S. Kulawik, and H. Worden (2009), A global comparison of carbon monoxide profiles and column amounts from Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) and Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT), J. Geophys. Res., 114, D21307, doi:10.1029/2009JD012242.

Cited By

Please wait one moment ...