Abstract
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH,
VOL. 116,
D07102,
8 PP., 2011
doi:10.1029/2010JD014891
Global radiosonde balloon drift statistics
- Radiosonde balloon drift distances vary spatially, vertically, and seasonally
- Elapsed time of observations exceed estimates assuming constant balloon rise
- A global climatology of radiosonde drift statistics is newly compiled
NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
I.M. Systems Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA
I.M. Systems Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA
NOAA Center for Satellite Applications and Research, Camp Springs, Maryland, USA
The drift of radiosonde balloons during their ascent has generally been considered a negligible factor in applications involving radiosonde observations. However, several applications envisioned for observations from the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Reference Upper Air Network (GRUAN) require estimates of balloon drift. This study presents a comprehensive global climatology of radiosonde balloon drift distance and ascent time, based on 2 years of data from 419 stations, with particular attention to GRUAN stations. Typical drift distances are a few kilometers in the lower troposphere, ∼5 km in the midtroposphere, ∼20 km in the upper troposphere, and ∼50 km in the lower stratosphere, although there is considerable variability due to variability in climatological winds. Drift distances tend to increase with height above the surface, be larger in midlatitudes than in the tropics, be larger in winter than in summer, and vary with wind (and consequent balloon drift) direction. Most estimates of elapsed time from balloon launch to various pressure levels, due to vertical balloon rise, have median values ranging from about 5 min at 850 hPa to about 1.7 h at 10 hPa, with ranges of about 20% of median values. Observed elapsed times exceed those estimated using assumed 5 or 6 m/s rise rates.
Received 10 August 2010; accepted 20 January 2011; published 7 April 2011.
Citation: (2011), Global radiosonde balloon drift statistics, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D07102, doi:10.1029/2010JD014891.
Cited By
