next up previous
Next: Block Rotations Along Up: Lithosphere dynamics and continental Previous: Pore Water at

Extension in the Basin and Range Province

The argument about the kinematic history of detachment faults in metamorphic core complexes has become quite heated. One school believes that these faults form and slip at high (65) dip angles, but that the footwall bends to near-horizontal dip as it nears the surface. Buck [1993] extended this bending-footwall model for normal fault rotation and showed why low-angle detachment faults should only be found in regions of anomalous heat flow. The classic example of the active normal fault along the front of the Black Mountains in Death Valley has been shown to be segmented in dip, from a maximum of 60W in the subsurface to a minimum of 17W where the footwall is exposed to the east [ Miller, 1991].

However, striking evidence has also been presented for the view that at least some detachments slip while in a near-horizontal orientation. Dokka [1993] used a new technique of paleodepth determination to show that the Newberry Mountains detachment in California had an initial dip of only 20 to 27. The Rawhide detachment fault in Arizona was active at a low dip [ Scott and Lister, 1992], as shown by a marker tuff and truncated normal faults (in a section that cannot be balanced) in the upper plate. In southeast Arizona, a Miocene detachment with a dip of 20 down to 6 km also projects updip to within 100 m of Quaternary scarps [ Johnson and Loy, 1992], which seems to show that the fault remains active at this dip.

If well-developed faults of large slip are intrinsically weak, however, these two views may not be incompatible. Detachments faults could form at high dips (while still strong), rotate to low dips by footwall bending, and continue to slip due to an aquired weakness. Some compensating deformation of the hanging wall would be required; in fact, almost all hanging walls seen in the Basin and Range province are extensively fractured and faulted.

An important new idea which has arisen in the last four years is that the lower crust of the Basin and Range province should behave as a viscous fluid, flowing in to fill the voids that extreme extension would otherwise form. Simple two-dimensional calculations [ Bird, 1991] show that in this province the high heat-flow should cause Moho topography to be destroyed in 1-20 million years (Ma) by lateral extrusion of the lower crust. In fact, observed variations of crustal thickness at the edge of the Basin/Range province are much less than they would be in balanced cross-sections, implying either lateral extrusion or massive intrusion; McCarthy and Parsons [1994] use seismic data to limit the amount of intrusion.

The spatial and temporal relationships between the different core complexes (the integration of regional velocity fields) and their ultimate cause remain problems for the future. One place where there is clarity is in a benchmark study of the patterns of faulting around the moving Yellowstone plume, by Pierce and Morgan [1992]; because much of this deformation was clearly distinct from earlier distributed Basin/Range extension, it may serve as a model for the interpretation of structure along other, more ancient plume tracks.



next up previous
Next: Block Rotations Along Up: Lithosphere dynamics and continental Previous: Pore Water at



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union