next up previous
Up: Molecular markers of zooplankton Previous: Conclusions

References

1
Ashjian, C. J., and K. F. Wishner, Temporal and spatial chnages in body size and reproductive state of Nannocalanus minor (Copepoda) females across and along the Gulf Stream, J. Plank. Res., 15, 67-98, 1993a.

2
Ashjian, C. J., and K. F. Wishner, Temporal persistence of copepod species groups in the Gulf Stream, Deep-Sea Res., 40, 483-516, 1993b.

3
Ashjian, C. J., S. L. Smith, C. N. Flagg, A. J. Mariano, W. J. Behrens, and P. V. Z. Lane, The influence of a Gulf Stream meander on the distribution of zooplankton biomass in the Slope Water, the Gulf Stream, and the Sargasso Sea, described using a shipboard acoustic Doppler current profiler, Deep-Sea Res., 41, 23-50, 1994.

4
Avise, J. C., Systematic value of electrophoretic data, Syst. Zool., 23, 465-481, 1974.

5
Avise, J. C., Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution, 511 pp., Chapman and Hall, Inc., New York, 1994.

6
Avise, J. C., J. A. Arnold, R. M. Ball, E. Bermingham, T. Lamb, J. E. Neigel, C. A. Reeb, and N. C. Saunders, Instraspecific phylogeography: The mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18, 489-522, 1987.

7
Batchelder, H., and C. Miller, The Gulf of Maine as a reservoir for stocking and supplying the copepod Calanus finmarchicus to Georges bank and the Middle Atlantic Bight: A modelling exercise, unpublished abstract, Gulf of Maine Scientific Workshop, Woods Hole, Mass., January, 1991.

8
Birky, C. W., P. Fuerst, and T. Maruyama, Organelle gene diversity under migration, mutation, and drift: Equilibrium expectations, approach to equilibrium, effects of heteroplasmic cells, and comparison to nuclear genes, Genetics, 121, 613-627, 1989.

9
Bruford, M. W., O. Hanotte, J. F. Y. Brookfield, and T. Burke, Single-locus and multilocus DNA fingerprinting, in Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations. A Practical Approach, edited by A. R. Hoelzel, pp. 225-269, IRL Press, Oxford, 1992.

10
Bucklin, A., Population genetic responses of the planktonic copepod Metridia pacifica to a coastal eddy in the California Current, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 14,799-14,808, 1991.

11
Bucklin, A., Molecular genetic diversity of the copepod, Nannocalanus minor, in the Gulf Stream: Evidence of large-scale transport, EOS, 75, 60, 1994.

12
Bucklin, A., and L. Kann, Mitochondrial DNA variation of copepods: Markers of species identity and population differentiation in Calanus., Biol. Bull., 181, 357, 1991.

13
Bucklin, A., and T. C. LaJeunesse, Molecular genetic variation of Calanus pacificus (Copepoda: Calanoida): Preliminary evaluation of genetic structure and sub-specific differentiation based on mtDNA sequences, paper from a CalCOFI Special Symposium: Genetics of California Current Organisms, CalCOFI Reports, 35, 45-51, 1994.

14
Bucklin, A., and N. H. Marcus, Genetic differentiation of populations of the planktonic copepod Labidocera aestiva, Mar. Biol., 84, 219-224, 1985.

15
Bucklin, A., and P. H. Wiebe, Genetic heterogeneity in euphausiid populations: Euphausia krohnii and Nematocelis megalops in the North Atlantic Slope Water, Limnol. Oceanogr., 31, 1346-1352, 1986.

16
Bucklin, A., M. M. Reinecker, and C. N. K. Mooers, Genetic tracers of zooplankton transport in coastal filamnets of the U.S. west coast, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 8277-8288, 1989.

17
Bucklin, A., B. W. Frost, and T. D. Kocher, DNA sequence variation of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA in Calanus (Copepoda; Calanoida): Intraspecific and interspecific patterns, Molec. Mar. Biol. Biotech., 1, 397-407, 1992.

18
Bucklin, A., B. W. Frost, and T. D. Kocher, Molecular systematics of six species of Calanus and three species of Metridia (Copepoda; Calanoida), Mar. Biol., in press, 1994.

19
Carr, S. M., and H. D. Marshall, A direct approach to the measurement of genetic variation in fish populations: Application of the polymerase chain reaction to studies of Atlantic Cod, Gadus morhua L., J. Fish Biol., 39, 101-107, 1991a.

20
Carr, S. M., and H. D. Marshall, Detection of intraspecific DNA sequence variation in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene of Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua) by the polymerase chain reaction, Canadian J. Fish. Aquatic Sci., 48, 48-52, 1991b.

21
Caudill, C. C., and A. Bucklin, MtDNA sequence divergence within the copepod Acartia tonsa among estuaries of the eastern U.S., Abstracts of the ASLO/PSA Joint Meeting, 12-16 June, 1994, a-14, 1994.

22
Chelton, D. B., P. A. Bernal, and J. A. McGowan, Large-scale interannual physical and biological interaction in the California Current, J. Mar. Res., 40, 1095-1125, 1982.

23
Edwards, C. A., and D. O. F. Skibinski, Genetic variation of mitochondrial DNA in mussel ( Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis) populations from South West England and South Wales, Mar. Biol., 94, 547-556, 1987.

24
Fager, E. W., and J. A. McGowan, Zooplankton species groups in the North Pacific, Science, 140, 453-460, 1963.

25
Finnerty, J. R., and B. A. Block, Direct sequencing of mitochondrial DNA detects highly divergent haplotypes in blue marlin ( Makaira nigricans), Molec. Mar. Biol. Biotech., 1, 206-214, 1992.

26
Flierl, G. R., and C. S. Davis, Biological effects of Gulf Stream meandering, J. Mar. Res., 51, 529-560, 1993.

27
Gold, J. R., and L. R. Richardson, Genetic studies of marine fishes. IV. An analysis of population structure in the red drum ( Sciaenops ocellatus) using mitochondrial DNA, Fisheries Res., 12, 213-241, 1991.

28
Gregorius, H., The probability of losing an allele when diploid genotypes are sampled, Biometrics, 36, 643-652, 1980.

29
Haury, L. R., J. J. Simpson, J. Palaez, C. J. Koblinsky, and D. Wiesenhahn, Biological consequences of a recurrent eddy off Point Conception, California, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 12,937-12,956, 1986.

30
Herman, A. W., D. D. Sameoto, C. Shunnian, M. R. Mitchell, B. Petrie, and N. Cochrane, Sources of zooplankton on the Nova Scotia Shelf and their aggregations within deep-shelf basins, Cont. Shelf Res., 11, 211-238, 1991.

31
Hitchcock, G. L., A. J. Mariano, and T. Rossby, Mesoscale pigment fields in the Gulf Stream: Observations in a meander crest and trough, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 8425-8445, 1993.

32
Hofmann, E. E., K. S. Halstrom, J. R. Moisan, D. B. Haidvogel, and D. L. Mackas, Use of simulated drifter tracks to investigate general transport patterns and residence times in the coastal transition zone, J. Geophys.\ Res., 96, 15,041-15,052, 1991.

33
Innis, M. A., K. B. Myambo, D. H. Gelfand, and M. A. D. Brow, DNA sequencing with Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase and direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction-amplified DNA, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.\ USA, 85, 9436-9440, 1988.

34
Jeffreys, A. J., V. Wilson, and S. L. Thein, Individual-specific ``fingerprints'' of human DNA, Nature, 316, 76-79, 1985.

35
Kornfield, I., and S. M. Bogdanowicz, Differentiation of mitochondrial DNA in Atlantic herring, Clupea harengus, Fish. Bull., 85, 561-568, 1987.

36
Kumar, S., K. Tamura, and M. Nei, MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, Version 1.0, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Penn., 16802, 1993.

37
Lohrenz, S. E., J. J. Cullen, D. A. Phinney, D. B. Olson, and C. S. Yentsch, Distributions of pigments and primary production in a Gulf Stream meander, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 14,545-14,560, 1993.

38
Mackas, D. L., L. Washburn, and S. L. Smith, Zooplankton community pattern associated with a California Current cold filament, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 14,781-14,797, 1991.

39
McMillan, W. O., R. A. Raff, and S. R. Palumbi, Population genetic consequences of developmental evolution in sea urchins (genus Heliocidaris), Evolution, 46, 1299-1312, 1992.

40
Meise-Munns, C., J. Green, M. Ingham, and D. Mountain, Interannual variability in the copepod populations of Georges Bank and the western Gulf of Maine, Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 65, 225-232, 1990.

41
Miller, C. B., Some environmental consequences of vertical migration in marine zooplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 21, 727-741, 1976.

42
Miller, C. B., T. J. Cowles, P. H. Wiebe, N. J. Copley, and H. Grigg, Phenology in Calanus finmarchicus: Hypotheses about control mechanisms, Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 72, 79-91, 1991.

43
Nei, M., Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution, 356 pp., American Elsevier, New York, 1975.

44
Nei, M., Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, 512 pp., Columbia University Press, New York, 1987.

45
Nelson, K., and D. Hedgecock, Enzyme polymorphism and adaptive strategy in the decapod crustacea, Am. Nat., 111, 361-365, 1980.

46
Olson, D. B., and R. R. Hood, Modelling pelagic biogeography, Progr.\ Oceanogr., 34, 161-205, 1994.

47
Ovenden, J. R., Mitochondrial DNA and marine stock assessment: A review, Austr. J. Mar. Freshw. Res., 41, 835-853, 1990.

48
Palumbi, S. R., and C. W. Brand, Mitochondrial DNA variability within and between species of Penaeid shrimp, Molec. Mar. Biol. Biotech., 2, 1993.

49
Palumbi, S. R., and B. D. Kessing, Population biology of the trans-Arctic exchange: mtDNA sequence similarity between Pacific and Atlantic sea urchins, Evolution, 45, 1790-1805, 1991.

50
Pelaez, J., and J. A. McGowan, Phytoplankton pigment patterns in the California Current as determined by satellite, Limnol. Oceanogr., 31, 927-950, 1986.

51
Pieper, R. E., D. V. Holliday, and G. S. Kleppel, Quantitative zooplankton distributions from multifrequency acoustics, J. Plank. Res., 12, 433-441, 1990.

52
Plourde, S., and J. A. Runge, Reproduction of the planktonic copepod, Calanus finmarchicus, in the Lower St. Lawrence Estuary: Relation to the cycle of phytoplankton production and evidence for a Calanus pump, Mar.\ Ecol. Progr. Ser., 102, 217-227, 1993.

53
Queller, D. C., J. E. Strassmann, and C. R. Hughes, Microsatellites and kinship, Trends Ecol. Evol., 8, 285-288, 1993.

54
Reeb, C. A., and J. C. Avise, A genetic discontinuity in a continuously distributed species: Mitochondrial DNA in the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica, Genetics, 124, 397-406, 1990.

55
Richardson, P. L., Gulf Stream rings, in Eddies in Marine Science, edited by Allan R. Robinson, pp. 19-45, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.

56
Roff, D. A., and P. Bentzen, The statistical analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms: X2 and the problem of small samples, Mol. Biol.\ Evol., 6, 539-545, 1989.

57
Saitou, N., and M. Nei, The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees, Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406-425, 1987.

58
Sameoto, D. D., and A. W. Herman, Life cycle and distribution of Calanus finmarchicus in deep basins on the Nova Scotia shelf and seasonal changes in Calanus spp., Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 66, 225-237, 1990.

59
Saunders, N. C., L. G. Kessler, and J. C. Avise, Genetic variation and geographic differentiation in mitochondrial DNA of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus, Genetics, 112, 613-627, 1986.

60
Slatkin, M., and W. P. Maddison, Detecting isolation by distance using phylogenies of genes, Genetics, 126, 249-260, 1990.

61
Song, T., T. Rossby, and E. Carter, Lagrangian studies of fluid exchange between the Gulf Stream and surrounding waters, J. Phys. Oceanogr., in press, 1994.

62
Stott, W., M. M. Ferguson, and R. F. Tallman, Genetic population structure of American plaice ( Hippoglossoides platessoides) from the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 49, 2538-2545, 1992.

63
Strub, P. T., P. M. Kosro, and A. Huyer, The nature of cold filaments in the California Current System, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 14,743-14,768, 1991.

64
Tremblay, M. J., and M. Sinclair, Planktonic sea scallop larvae ( Placopecten magellanicus) in the Georges Bank region: Broadscale distribution in relation to physical oceanography, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 49, 1597-1615, 1992.

65
U.S. GLOBEC, Implementation Plan for the U.S. GLOBEC N.W. Atlantic/Georges Bank Study, Rep. No. 6, 69 pp., U.S. GLOBEC Office, University of California, Davis, 1992.

66
Werner, F. E., F. H. Page, D. R. Lynch, J. W. Loder, R. G. Lough, R. I. Perry, D. A. Greenberg, and M. M. Sinclair, Influences of mean advection and simple behavior on the distribution of cod and haddock early life stages on Georges Bank, Fisheries Oceanogr., 2, 43-64, 1993.

67
Wiebe, P. H., N. J. Copley, and S. H. Boyd, Coarse-scale horizontal patchiness and vertical migration of zooplankton in Gulf Stream warm-core ring 82-H, Deep-Sea Res., 39, S247-S278, 1992.

68
Wilson, A. C., et al., Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics, Biol. Jour. Linnean Soc., 26, 375-400, 1985.

69
Wright, S., Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies, 511 pp., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1969.

70
Yamazaki, H., and L. R. Haury, A new Lagrangian model to study animal aggregation, Ecol. Modelling, 69, 99-111, 1993.

71
Zwanenburg, K. C. T., P. Bentzen, and J. M. Wright, Mitochondrial DNA differentiation in western North Atlantic populations of haddock ( Melanogrammus aeglefinus), Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 49, 2527-2537, 1992.

 
Figure 1: Haplotype frequency distribution for 104 individuals of the planktonic marine copepod, Calanus finmarchicus, in samples collected from the coastal western North Atlantic Ocean and Norwegian Sea. The frequency distribution is strongly skewed, with one abundant, nearly ubiquitous haplotype and numerous unique haplotypes. This haplotype frequency distribution is typical of the seven planktonic crustaceans that have been studied.

 
Figure 2: Numbers of individuals of each haplotype for Calanus finmarchicus by region for samples collected in 1992. The samples within each region were pooled to show regional patterns of haplotype distributions. The regions (and the numbers of individuals sequenced, N) are: the Gulf of St. Lawrence (left symbol: N=17), the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence (right symbol: N=8), Georges Bank (N=28), Wilkinson Basin in the Gulf of Maine (N=19), and the Norwegian Sea (N=32). Two symbols are shown for the Gulf of St. Lawrence since one sample was genetically distinctive from all others.

 
Figure 3: Phylogeographic tree showing patterns of molecular variation in the planktonic calanoid copepod, Nannocalanus minor, in the Gulf Stream System. Molecular genetic traits separated the species into two distinct groups (a larger, western form and a smaller, eastern form) which differed by 10% of the bases in a region of mitochondrial DNA. This level of base sequence variation is far larger than that typical between conspecific populations; it suggests that the forms are actually different species. Within the western form, there were no
[4]

 
Figure 3: Figure 3 continued.

significant differences in haplotype frequencies between samples collected from the Florida Straits (shown as circles) and the meander region of the Gulf Stream (shown as squares); sequence variation between individuals of the larger form was <1%. Numbers following the circles and squares indicate the numbers of individuals sequenced from each of the regions; symbols that are not followed by a number represent one individual; numbers on horizontal branches are branch lengths. (See Saitou and Nei [1987] for a discussion of tree building techniques.)

 
Figure 4: (A) Distributions of the subspecies of the planktonic copepod, Calanus pacificus, in the North Pacific Ocean. Collection locations of samples for molecular analysis are indicated by symbols. [Distribution map is after unpublished work of Abraham Fleminger, Scripps Institution of Oceanography (deceased).] (B) Phylogeographic tree showing molecular variation between individuals of the planktonic calanoid copepod, Calanus pacificus, collected from different locations in the North Pacific Ocean. The molecular analysis
[4]

 
Figure 4: Figure 4 continued.

supported the division of C. p. californicus (samples CCS and PUGET) and C. p. pacificus (PAPA). Sequence divergence between the subspecies was low (around 1%), which is typical of intraspecific divergences, but the C. p. pacificus individuals grouped on a distinct branch of the tree and there was no overlap in the haplotypes, suggesting that these differences are greater than typically found between conspecific populations. Some geographic partitioning within
[4]

 
Figure 4: Figure 4 continued.

C. p. californicus is suggested by the arrangement of individuals on the tree branches, but confirmation will require larger sample sizes. Symbols on the tree correspond to collection sites; individuals are named by collection site with a final number or letter to denote that individual; numbers at branch points are the percentage of trees showing that branchpoint in 1000 bootstrapped subreplicates. (See Saitou and Nei [1987] for a discussion of tree-building techniques.)



next up previous
Up: Molecular markers of zooplankton Previous: Conclusions



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union