cycles, Nature, 331, 55-56,
1988.
,
influence of marine biota at high latitudes, J. Geophys Res.,
89, 4629-4637, 1984.
change: The iron
hypothesis, Paleoceanography, 5, 1-13, 1990a.
, Nature,
308, 621-624, 1984.
variations and ocean circulation, Nature, 308, 624-625, 1984.
Figure 1: Schematic of the ``biological pump'' which transports
CO
from the atmosphere to the deep ocean. CO
is assimilated
by phytoplankton through photosynthesis in the sunlit surface
waters and converted to organic carbon. This phytoplankton biomass
fuels a complex foodweb through which nutrients and CO
are
recycled many times in the surface waters. The large phytoplankton
are eaten by zooplankton and the small phytoplankton and bacteria
are eaten by microzooplankton, which are in turn eaten by the
zooplankton. Phytoplankton photosynthesize and excrete dissolved
organic carbon which fuels the bacteria. In the
Figure 1. continued:
open ocean, most of the CO
that is used in phytoplankton
photosynthesis is ultimately released back into the atmosphere
through their respiration, and that of the organisms who have eaten
them. Some of the carbon finds its way to the deep ocean as
zooplankton feces or pieces of dead organisms, where it is
remineralized by bacteria back to CO
. The net result is
concentration of CO
(and nutrients) in the deep ocean, and
deposition of very small amounts of carbon on the sea floor. Since
most of the organic carbon generated through photosynthesis is
converted to CO
with each trophic transfer (represented by
arrows), the structure of the food web---its design and the
relative abundance of its components---is a critical determinant of
the efficiency of the biological pump.
Figure 2: Depth profiles of (A) inorganic nutrients and (B)
dissolved inorganic carbon in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
Nutrients are essentially depleted in the surface waters where they
limit phytoplankton production. Largely through the mechanism of
the biological pump, both nutrients and CO
are concentrated in
the deep sea. (A: Adapted from Richards, 1968; B: Adapted from
Broecker, 1974).
Figure 3: ``Typical'' results from iron-enrichment bottle incubation
experiments---in this case from the subarctic Pacific (after Martin
& Fitzwater, 1988). Chlorophyll (A), and nitrate (B)
concentrations in bottles incubated with (open circles) and without
(closed circles) added iron (5 nmol kg
) for 6 days. The
iron-enriched bottles show dramatically increased chlorophyll
concentrations and decreased nitrate and phosphate relative to the
control bottles. Examination of the phytoplankton community in the
bottles revealed substantial growth of pennate diatoms in the iron
enriched bottles, which were a minor component of the phytoplankton
community initially.
Figure 4: The ``life history'' of an iron-enriched patch in the
surface waters of the equatorial Pacific (adapted from Fitzwater
and Hunter, 1994). The iron was distributed on Julian day 297
(Oct. 24, 1993) and followed as it drifted in the surface currents
with the aid of satellite monitored drifting buoys. A low-salinity
front intruded on the patch on Julian day 302 and pushed it down to
20-40 m. Although it could still be tracked, the experiment was
disrupted because of the reduced light levels at these depths.
Figure 5: Comparison of phytoplankton activity inside and outside
the patch during the iron fertilization experiment. (A) Average
chlorophyll concentrations (a measure of photosynthetic biomass)
and (B) average primary production (the rate of photosynthesis)
inside and outside the patch between Julian day 299 and 302. The
mixed layer, and hence the iron enriched waters, extended down to
about 40 m. (Data courtesy of R. Bidigare and R. Barber; after
Martin et al., 1994)
Figure 6: Response of various size fractions of the phytoplankton
community to the addition of iron compared with those outside the
patch, two days following the beginning of iron enrichment. (A)
Increases in F
/F
, which is a measure of the quantum
efficiency of part of the photosynthetic apparatus in phytoplankton
and reaches a maximum of 0.65 under optimal growth conditions
(Kolber et al., 1988), and (B) Chlorophyll concentrations in
different size fractions of the phytoplankton community in and out
of the patch. (After Kolber et al., 1994.)
Figure 7: Comparison of the response of the phytoplankton in the
iron-enriched patch with those in bottle incubations done in
parallel on board ship. The bottles were filled with water from
25m, enriched with 5 nM Fe (as a sulfate), and incubated on deck at
simulated in situ light intensities. Closed symbols are the
Fe-enriched waters in all panels. Note the difference in scale in
(C). Note also that day-0 values in (A) were calculated from
``out-of-patch'' stations. (A) After Martin et. al. 1994. (B,C)
Data courtesy of K. Coale, R. Bidigare.
Figure 8: Iron and CO
levels in an ice core from the Antarctic,
showing an inverse correlation through two glacial/interglacial
transitions. Martin hypothesized that the elevated iron
concentrations stimulated primary productivity in the waters around
the Antarctic, thus removing significant amounts of CO
from the
atmosphere (adapted from Martin, 1992). Ice core ages are in years
``before present.''

Table 1. Relative molar concentrations of trace elements in today's oceans (normalized to P), and in the anoxic ocean characteristic of early evolutionary times (molar concentrations), compared with the molar ratios of these elements in today's phytoplankton (modified from Brand, 1991; Martin et al 1993). Comparing the availability of the various elements in the water today with that in the phytoplankton reveals that iron is in short supply relative to the requirements of the cells. In the ancient ocean when biochemical pathways were evolving, iron was readily available relative to other trace elements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P Fe Zn Mn Cu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Plankton Composition 1000 10 2 0.4 0.6 (molar ratios)
Average Seawater Atlantic 1000 0.45 1.7 0.58 1.7 Composition (molar ratios) Pacific 1000 0.2 3.0 0.075 1.5
Ancient (anoxic) Oceans
(molar concentrations) 10
10
10
10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------