next up previous
Next: References Up: Atmospheric science in the Previous: 7. Cloud Electrification

8. Conclusions

Laboratory experiments are important in as far as they permit approach from several directions; to place boundaries on the possible, to be confirmed by a combination of new laboratory studies from wind tunnel to molecular scale. They are further of importance in suggesting aircraft studies which measure cloud properties at important places and numerical approaches to see if the numbers from laboratory and field make sense in the overall evolution of the cloud system. As important a concept is that just because a certain set of laboratory measurements ``fit'' the observations it may only be one of a set of physical processes. One needs to err on the side of rigor and caution in approaching this problem.

Desiderata may be summarized:

Laboratory techniques have demonstrated sensitivity to microscale processes in several areas. This includes radiative properties of clouds, both cirrus and aerosol role in global radiation budgets; precipitation to remove water substance by ice/water processes to distribute latent heating/cooling as influenced by detail of the processes; electrification as a diagnostic tool for dynamical evolution. Uncertainty in introducing these ideas in the different scales of numerical models reflects the basic uncertainties of our knowledge of the processes discussed. Lack of understanding here is critical; numerical models without such insights will be of limited predictive utility.

Insight into preparation of this summary was obtained while working under Grant ATM-9021918, National Science Foundation, Meteorology Program.



next up previous
Next: References Up: Atmospheric science in the Previous: 7. Cloud Electrification



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union