next up previous
Next: Conclusion Up: The ionosphere's wild ride Previous: Outer plasmasphere/ring current

Predictions and evidence for ionospheric plasma flows into the ring current, plasma sheet and low-latitude boundary layer

The more global-scale magnetospheric issues concerning ionospheric plasma flow to major magnetospheric regions were examined during this quadrenial period with single-particle trajectory tracing and energetic ion composition measurements. In the former category, Delcourt and colleagues considered several aspects in the ion trajectory tracing of large-scale transport of ionospheric ions. For example, Delcourt et al. [[1990]] have modeled the storm-time transport of ionospheric plasma from the dayside polar cleft ion fountain into the ring current. Modeling the transition in middle magnetosphere magnetic field configuration from taillike to dipolelike, they show that such transport may energize O into the range several keV to several hundred keV, with accompanying pitch angle trapping. Hence, the cleft ion fountain may make a substantial contribution to the ring current formation during dipolarization events. Delcourt et al. [[1993]; [1994]] also used particle trajectory modeling to analyze the large-scale transport of the polar wind and cleft-originating ions into the plasma sheet and magnetotail. They find that during quiet times the polar wind may access the distant magnetotail and may be trapped by non-adiabatic scattering processes, and hence should be an important source for the nightside central plasma sheet population. Cladis and Francis [[1992]] used ion trajectory modeling to calculate the effects of cleft-origin O on the plasma sheet pressure distribution and suggested that these effects might alter the magnetic and electric field distributions sufficiently to trigger substorms.

Observational U. S. contributions to our understanding of ionospheric plasma in the outer magnetosphere were made chiefly by the Lockheed group. Lennartsson [{[1994]] analyzed a large set of International Sun-Earth Explorer-1(ISEE-1) energetic (0.1-16 keV/e) ion composition data from the central magnetotail between 10 and 23 R geocentric distance, and showed that H exhibits a steeper density gradient than O. The data of Lennartsson [{[1994]] further supported the idea that tail lobe convection is directed inward from the dawn and dusk flanks. Lennartson et al. [[1993]] also examined the concept(noted earlier) that significant populations of energized O may serve as a trigger or amplifier for substorms/geomagnetic activity. However, their correlation studies do not support this concept, although O is found to constitute the bulk of the mass density in the tail current sheet.

Ionospheric composition(and other aspects) of regions near the magnetopause were studied by Fuselier and co-workers. Fuselier et al. [[1991]] examined Active Magnetospheric Particle Tracer Explorer(AMPTE) ion composition data from the dayside magnetosheath region to investigate the origin of energetic ion events there. Although most of the observed energetic ions appear to be of solar wind origin, the occasional presence of magnetospheric O suggests occasional leakage from the dayside magnetosheath. Fuselier et al. [[1993]] also examined the general mass density and pressure changes across the dayside magnetopause using measurements from AMPTE. On most occasions, H was the dominant mass and pressure contributor in the magnetosheath and low-latitude boundary layer(LLBL), but in one of their observations O was the dominant contributor to the LLBL.



next up previous
Next: Conclusion Up: The ionosphere's wild ride Previous: Outer plasmasphere/ring current



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union