next up previous
Next: Galileo Reveals that Up: Galileo's Second Flyby Previous: Galileo's Second Flyby

The Bow Shock

In the second flyby of the Earth, Galileo approached from the southern dusk hemisphere of the tail lobe. The trajectory is plotted in Figure 5 in terms of = ( y + z) versus x in an aberrated GSE coordinate system. The spacecraft was well outside the nominal position of the distant bow shock as inferred from the fit of Greenstadt et al. [1990], but it repeatedly crossed the shock surface, moving back and forth between the solar wind and the magnetosheath. The multiple magnetosheath encounters are evident as the shaded portions of the magnetometer data acquired near 300 R downtail that is plotted in Figure 6. The total field shows abrupt changes between states that differ in amplitude by factors less than 1.5, indicating an extremely weak shock. Prior to each entry into the magnetosheath and following each exit, the field in the solar wind rotated. As described above for the distant Venus bow shock [ Khurana and Kivelson, 1994], for steady solar wind conditions, these rotations of the IMF are causally linked to the motion of the bow shock past Galileo, with the bow shock cross section standing farthest from the tail axis when the IMF is perpendicular to the local shock normal. Indeed, over the period of several hours shown in Figure 6, during which the solar wind plasma conditions appear to have remained fairly steady, the repeated crossings into the magnetosheath coincided with field rotations into a quasi-perpendicular orientation. The inbound crossings reveal quite monotonic and abrupt variations, consistent with the properties of weak quasi-perpendicular shocks. Additional bow shock crossings have been identified between x -360 R, 190 R and x -120 R, 70 R. The positions of these crossings are shown in Figure 5 as crosses (for inbound) and circles (for outbound). The solar wind plasma conditions seem to have remained roughly constant between the first (quasiperpendicular) shock crossings on December 5, 1992 and the crossing near -170 R early on December 7, 1992, with the crossings between -360 and -300 R corresponding to encounters with the quasiperpendicular bow shock and crossings between -230 and -170 R corresponding to encounters with the quasiparallel bow shock. The remaining crossings occurred later on December 7, 1992 during anomalous solar wind plasma conditions which appear to have compressed the entire magnetosphere and driven the bow shock to positions unusually close to the tail axis.

These encounters add extensively to the data on the distant terrestrial bow shock. The previous data on the distant bow shock surface are those of Greenstadt et al. [1990]. They concluded on the basis of 7 segments of ISEE3 orbits between -20 and -100 R that Fairfield's [1971] hyperbolic model of the shock surface (with the terms introducing dawn-dusk asymmetry dropped) provides a satisfactory representation of the shock locus at antisolar distances out to 100 R. Fairfield's work was based on analysis of a much larger number of shock crossings but they were mostly sunward of 20 R. The additional crossings in the Galileo data set constrain the asymptotic opening angle of the shock surface to distances of order -350 R and reveal its dependence on the IMF orientation. Figure 5 shows the hyperbolic fits of Greenstadt et al. [1990] and the proposed fits to the quasiperpendicular shocks from the Galileo flyby. The parameters [A. Prevost et al., personal communication, 1994] are given in the figure caption. The new shock models, based on the insights provided by the Venus flyby, are consistent with the properties of MHD (magnetohydrodynamic) perturbations. They account for the frequent observation of multiple shock encounters along a spacecraft trajectory even in a steady solar wind.



next up previous
Next: Galileo Reveals that Up: Galileo's Second Flyby Previous: Galileo's Second Flyby



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union