With better data now available for thermal anomalies, Io's
outbursts have again become a promising avenue for future
progress. The outburst data are plotted in Fig. 1. Most of the
data lie above the boiling point of sulfur and, therefore,
require silicate lava. Recently a detailed analysis has been
carried out on the 1990 event [see Veeder et al., 1994a,b; Blaney
et al., 1994]. Such large outbursts (i.e., 10
W or larger)
are estimated to occur about 6% of the time [Blaney et al.,
1994]. The uncertainty in this estimate, however, is large. In
the 1990 event the source area increased at a rate of 1.5 x 10
m
s
. If this growth continued unabated it would equal the
whole surface of Io in
8.5 years. With a 6% frequency of
occurrence, this becomes
142 years. If one assumes that
all of Io's thermal anomalies are due to similar flows but in
various stages of cooling, then the spreading rate taken together
with the heat flow constrains the average flow thickness to be
1.9 m. The corresponding effusion rate is
3 x 10
m
s
. This is huge by terrestrial standards. However,
recent modeling of the 1800-01 Hualalai flow on the island of
Hawaii finds an effusion rate of
10
m
s
[Baloga
and Spudis, 1992]. Also there are examples larger effusion-rate
flows on the Moon [see Hulme and Fielder, 1977]. Therefore Io's
outbursts fall within the bounds of our experience. These
examples may serve as useful guides for developing an
understanding Io's flows.