next up previous
Next: Internal Stress and Up: Theoretical and experimental studies Previous: Critical Sizes

Theory Versus Observation

Probably the most important result of observations and theory of magnetic domains of the past decade is the demonstration that LEM states exist. Moreover, as discussed in the introduction, this will have important consequences for magnitudes and stabilities of virtually all remanent magnetizations. However, the precise number of LEM states allowed in a given grain depends on the theoretical model used and, moreover, the range of LEM states calculated does not always agree with those inferred from observations. Moon and Merrill [1985] used a one-dimensional calculation to obtain six LEM states for a 1 m magnetite cube. In general, as the size of the grain increases, so does the mean and range in the number of domains (i.e., LEM states) about the mean. Moon and Merrill [1985] concluded that while LEM states should exist, the activation energy between the calculated LEM states were too high. It was expected that when increasingly accurate two- and three-dimensional calculations became available, the predicted activation energies between LEM states would decrease and, consequently, so would the mean number and range of acceptable LEM states. This expectation has been realized. For example, Ye and Merrill [1991] used a quasi-two-dimensional calculation to find four LEM states for a m magnetite cube, while more recently, Xu et al. [1994] use a two-dimensional calculation to obtain only two LEM states for the same cube. It is important to recognize that these are not three ``competing'' models with different LEM state predictions! Instead the models have steadily improved and the Xu et al. [1994] model should be presently regarded as providing the best theoretical estimates for the number of LEM states in magnetite grains exceeding a micron in size.

The ability to compare theoretical to observed domain structure has varied with the technology available for imaging domains and domain walls in grains of different sizes. Only recently has it been possible to examine directly domain structures in small grains in the 0.05 m. size range. Moreover, most results from these techniques emphasize their potential, rather than producing definitive tests of theory. Most of these techniques involve magnetic force microscopy [e.g., Hartmann, 1989 1990, Williams et al ., 1992, Oti and Price, 1993, Gibson and Schultz, 1993, Hagg et al., 1993, and Lederman et al, 1993], but other methods also have been applied (e.g., high resolution scanning Lorentz electron microscopy by Yajima et al., [1993], and magnetic electron emission holography by Timmermans et al., [1993]. The effects of interactions between grains can have important consequences for domain structures, activation energies, etc., and these are being investigated by such techniques as magnetic force microscopy [e.g. Gibson and Schultz, 1993] and others (e.g., by the Wohlfarth-Henkle technique; [ Proksch and Moskowitz, 1994]. Although most of these experimental results are preliminary and illustrate their potential, the results appear consistent with the theories for magnetic structures in submicron grains; for example vortex-like structures are observed in needle-shaped SD permalloy grains [ Gibson and Schultz, 1993]. However, conventional indirect measures of magnetic structures indicate that the theory contains some serious omissions. For example, numerous experiments indicate that a substantially larger proportion of magnetization originates from magnetite grains that are bigger than d than permitted by the theory leading to such a curve as shown in Figure 3, which shows a broad range of domains after identical thermal treatments. The range in the number of domains in Figure 3 is significantly larger than that obtained after demagnetization in an alternating field. (This demagnetization was repeated many times to obtain a distribution.)

Thus both domain theory and observation appear to have confirmed the existence of LEM states. But in the case of titanomagnetites, including the end member magnetite, there is not good agreement between theory and observation. In general, Bitter pattern studies reveal far fewer domains (as much as an order of magnitude less) than what are predicted [e.g., Halgedahl, 1987, Worm et al., 1991, Heider et al., 1992]. Several explanations have been advanced to resolve this problem. Williams et al., [1992] calculated that as the depth of a domain wall decreases with respect to the surface, the wall becomes increasingly difficult to image with magnetic colloid. Newell et al. [1993] calculated that whereas 90 Neel walls would not be well-imaged with the Bitter technique, 180 Bloch and Neel walls would be observable. (The magnetization in Neel walls lies in the same plane as that in the adjacent domains---in contrast to that of Bloch walls.) In short, these authors argue that the discrepancy between theory and observation is due to incomplete imaging of all the domain walls when the Bitter technique is employed.

However, the above possible explanations do not appear to be telling the entire story, since other observational data show similar results to those obtained from the Bitter technique. For example, using the MOKE technique, both Worm et al. [1991] and Heider and Hoffmann [1992] observed only a few domains in moderately large (several tens of microns on a side) synthetic magnetite grains. It is important to point out that the MOKE technique images domains rather than walls, as done in the Bitter technique. Heider and Hoffman [1992] suggest that both techniques might underestimate the number of domains simply because the domain walls often will not be perpendicular to the crystal face on which the domains are observed. Although this almost certainly is a factor, it cannot account for the very large gap between theory and observation. Independently, Worm et al. [1991] and Moon [1991] argue that a high residual stress in the sample may explain the discrepancy. Moon [1991] also suggests there may be a large error in the exchange constant used in the theories. Ye and Merrill [1995a] present arguments against this last possibility and they carry out one- dimensional domain calculations to illustrate that the high residual stress suggestion does appear to be an important factor.

Much better agreement between observed and predicted number of domains has been recently obtained by Ozdemir and Dunlop [1993] on a large (several mm) single crystal of magnetite. Bitter patterns were observed on a [100] surface, revealing the 180, 71, and 109 walls with appropriate spacing, as expected from theory for magnetite. There are good reasons to suspect this sample has low residual stress relative to many magnetite samples used in other domain observations [e.g., Worm et al., 1991], adding support for the argument that the discrepancy between early theory and observation is primary a result that many of the magnetite samples used in the experiments contained high residual stress.

Of special interest is the possibility that a SD LEM state can exist in a large grain (e.g., next up previous
Next: Internal Stress and Up: Theoretical and experimental studies Previous: Critical Sizes




U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union