next up previous
Next: Thermal Expansivity, Up: Mineral physics of iron Previous: The Grüneisen Ratio

Specific Heat, and , of the Core

Stacey [1995] recommended that the electronic heat capacity for iron at core conditions should be , following the method of Boness et al. [1986]. For the outer core, Stacey [1995] corrected for reduced mean atomic mass from impurities (he assumed ), or 778 JkgK. The plot of isobaric versus for liquid iron shock experiments given by W.W. Anderson and Ahrens [1994] is between and at ICB conditions, in agreement with Stacey. Thus we find by both theory and experiment. Stacey showed that of the outer core is independent of depth because the temperature gradient is adiabatic. To make the correction to , we use the standard formula , where will be written in terms of . Using the relationship , where is the bulk sound velocity, Braginsky and Roberts [1995] expressed this formula in the form

where is the bulk sound velocity. is calculated for pure iron , where, according to Stacey [1995], . By substituting the PREM values for for the core at the CMB and at the IMB, taking for the diluted iron core, and using and , Braginsky and Roberts [1995] found and . Stacey [1994] found (midcore) to be for pure iron. Jeanloz and Wenk [1988] proposed for the inner core.



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union