next up previous
Next: 2.2. Wind Waves Up: 2. Surface Processes Previous: 2. Surface Processes

2.1. Bulk Parameterizations

Direct measurements of the surface fluxes are limited to a few specialized platforms so extensive, global-scale measurements must rely on the parameterization of the surface fluxes that can use easily measured quantities obtained either in situ or remotely [e.g., Katsaros et al. 1994]. The basic premise is that we can relate fluxes in the surface layer to logarithmic profiles of the mean quantities. The surface fluxes can then be determined from the mean wind, temperature and humidity at a single height by introducing bulk transfer coefficients of heat, moisture and momentum. This rationale applies directly to gas exchange also.

A major limitation of many bulk parameterizations of the surface fluxes is that they are not well defined in light wind conditions where the sea surface becomes very smooth [ Bradley et al., 1991; Miller et al., 1992]. Bradley et al. [1991] compared several parameterization methods with observations they obtained in relatively light winds in the western Pacific. They noted generally very good agreement between the model of Liu et al. [1979] and the observations below wind speeds of about 4 m s. The observations indicate, however, that the latent heat flux is nonzero even at zero wind speed, a factor not considered in most existing parameterizations. To account for this effect it is necessary to add a gustiness factor to the mean wind that is proportional to the convective scaling velocity (a velocity scale derived from the surface buoyancy flux and depth of the mixed layer) (C. W. Fairall et al., The TOGA COARE bulk flux algorithm submitted to J. Geophys. Res., [1994]). The stability dependence of the profiles of temperature, moisture and momentum in highly unstable conditions also should depart from the traditional over land functions. Based on preliminary data from COARE and the results of other tropical cruises, models are being developed to include these effects (e.g., C. W. Fairall et al., ibid.). Interpretation of surface temperature measurements also remains a problem and has been addressed recently. Bulk parameterizations of the fluxes require estimates of the skin temperature of the ocean that are not routinely available, except from a few infrared sensors flown on aircraft or mounted on research ships. Space-borne measurements provide skin temperatures, but uncertainties exist in the accuracy of the retrievals primarily due to the large absorptivity of long wave radiation by the high water vapor content of the atmosphere in the tropics. In situ measurements rely on temperatures obtained from about 2 m below the surface that must be corrected for the effect of overlying water temperature and the evaporation at the sea surface that produces the so-called cool skin effect (C. W. Fairall et al., The cool skin and warm layer in bulk flux calculations submitted to J. Geophys. Res., [1994]). Abrupt temperature gradients close to the surface are observed frequently in light wind conditions in the tropics where the daytime solar flux approaches 400 W m. Roughly half of this heat is absorbed within the top two meters of the ocean. The results presented by C. W. Fairall et al. (ibid.) indicate that a model of the surface warm layer, ollowing Price et al., [1986], is essential to properly determine the temperature at the surface of the ocean and differences in excess of 2 K are possible between 2 m depth and the surface. This temperature stratification indicates that the sea surface temperature is very sensitive to wind-driven mixing of the upper few meters of the ocean.

Improvements in the parameterization of fluxes are likely as a result of the very extensive sets of direct measurements obtained by ships and boundary layer aircraft over the open ocean in the past few years (e.g., SOFIA/ ASTEX and TOGA COARE) and from equivalent measurements in relatively shallow coastal waters that in addition to ships and aircraft utilize instrumented towers and fixed platforms (e.g., the Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) experiment, a recent initiative from the Office of Naval Research).



next up previous
Next: 2.2. Wind Waves Up: 2. Surface Processes Previous: 2. Surface Processes



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union