next up previous
Next: Relationship between Exposure Up: Components of Quantitative Previous: Photosynthesis vs. Irradiance

Biological Weighting Function

A biological weighting function, or action spectrum, takes account of the wavelength-dependency of biological action; it is a critical parameter in the assessment of the potential biological effects of -related enhanced ultraviolet radiation [NAS 1979, NAS 1982,NAS 1984, Coohill 1989]. A number of authors [Rundel 1983, Caldwell 1968, Caldwell Camp Warner 1986] have shown that an accurate knowledge of is essential in order to make quantitative estimates of biologically effective irradiance. Biological weighting functions have traditionally been determined by evaluating biological responsiveness to monochromatic radiation with the objective of identifying potential chromophore targets and elucidating photobiological mechanisms [Coohill 1991]. Caldwell and co-workers (1986) [Caldwell Camp Warner Flint 1986] reviewed evidence suggesting that weighting functions determined using polychromatic radiation and intact organisms may have more ecological relevance with respect to assessing the ozone reduction problem. Work during the 80's [Ray Smith Baker 1982 assessment, Rundel 1983, Caldwell Camp Warner Flint 1986] provided biological weighting functions for plant damage by UV that showed relatively strong dependence on UV-B but also showed a significant contribution from the UV-A (320-400nm) region.

The last few years have seen significant progress in determining biological weighting functions for the inhibition of photosynthesis by phytoplankton. Recent work by Cullen and co-workers [Cullen Neale Lesser 1992, Neale Lesser Cullen carbon 1994] used principal component analysis of experimental results to estimate biological weighting functions which describe the effects of polychromatic radiation on cells with a relatively high resolution, smoothly-varying spectral response. Their work provides functions for the inhibition of phytoplankton photosynthesis by ultraviolet radiation, with results in absolute units (). Other recent estimates, using relatively course broadband spectroscopy, of of natural populations include the work by Mitchell and co-workers (1990), [Mitchell 1990 action spectra diffuse sobolev], by Helbling et al. (1992), [Helbling Villafane Ferrario Holm-Hansen 1992] and by Behrenfeld et al. (1993a,b). [Behrenfeld Hardy Gucinski Hanneman Lee Wones 1993, Behrenfeld Chapman Hardy Lee 1993] Figure 1 compares several recently published action spectra, all normalized to 1.0 at 300nm. There is now broad agreement among these several workers that the biological weighting, while highest in the UV-B, also contains a significant UV-A component. Although it did not employ completely natural irradiance, the experimental approach of Cullen et al. provides a practical advantage toward assessing the effects of ultraviolet radiation and ozone depletion, because it generates weightings in absolute units, permitting direct comparison of biological effectiveness between experiments [Neale Lesser Cullen carbon 1994], including more accurate comparison of biological effects produced by artificial sources with different spectral distributions and those due to actual and/or predicted natural radiation. It also provides for the development of quantitative models for the prediction of future impacts of ozone depletion [Cullen Neale 1994 depletion]. There is a need for accuracy because relatively small changes in can lead to large changes in biologically effective irradiance.


next up previous
Next: Relationship between Exposure Up: Components of Quantitative Previous: Photosynthesis vs. Irradiance



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union