next up previous
Next: Renaissance Up: Mantle dynamics: Influence of Previous: Mantle dynamics: Influence of

Introduction

The question of whether the mantle convects as a single layer, or whether the convection is split vertically into two or more layers, is perhaps the most fundamental unanswered question concerning the structure and dynamics of the mantle, and has ramifications throughout solid Earth geosciences. The most likely mechanism for enforcing layered convection is the action of the major phase transitions of the transition zone, and in particular, the strong endothermic phase transition between -spinel and perovskite+magnesiowustite that occurs at around 660 km depth. Because this transition is endothermic, it is deflected downwards in cold downwellings, and upwards in hot upwellings, resulting in a mass anomaly that impedes the penetration of the downwelling or upwelling. In the past few years, there has been a huge resurgence of interest and modeling activity devoted to studying the influence of the 400 and 660 km phase transitions, and the effects identified in these studies may provide the key to reconciling various seemingly contradictory geophysical observations.

The theoretical framework to studies of mantle convection with phase transitions was laid down over two decades ago [ Schubert and Turcotte, 1971; Schubert et al., 1975], and extended by the analytical models of plumes encountering an endothermic phase boundary presented by Olson and Yuen [1982]. Peltier et al. [1989] extended the earlier stability analyses to more realistic spherical geometry and updated parameters. However, at the high Rayleigh number (an indicator of convective vigor) characteristic of the Earth, the effects are too complex to be treated with analytical models, and time-dependent numerical simulations are necessary.

Christensen and Yuen [1984, 1985] presented the first and most definitive numerical models of phase-transition modulated mantle convection, performed in a two-dimensional box, and the major findings in these works have stood up in all subsequent studies. These findings are (1) the anomalous buoyancy due to deflection of the phase transition in an up- or down-welling is much more important than the effect of latent heat release, and thus the net effect of an endothermic phase transition is to oppose the flow of material across itself, (2) the propensity to layering increases with increasing Rayleigh number and increasing negativity of the Clapeyron slope (the gradient of the phase boundary in pressure/temperature space), (3) in the regime between complete layering and completely whole-mantle convection, intermittent layering can occur [ Christensen and Yuen, 1985], (4) variable viscosity in the downwelling slab does not appear to have a large effect on the strength of phase change necessary to stop it from penetrating [ Christensen and Yuen, 1984, 1985]. However, after these pioneering studies there was no further work on the subject for many years, due partly to the unrealistically large value of the Clapeyron slope these authors found was necessary to enforce complete layering (-6 MPa K), and partly to the continuing uncertainty as to whether the 660 km discontinuity represented a phase or compositional discontinuity.





next up previous
Next: Renaissance Up: Mantle dynamics: Influence of Previous: Mantle dynamics: Influence of



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union