next up previous
Up: Recent advances in simulation-optimization Previous: Conclusions

References

1
Ahlfeld, D.P., and M. Heidari, Applications of optimal hydraulic control to ground-water systems, ASCE J. Water Resour. Plan. and Manag., 120(3), 350-365, 1994.

2
Alley, W., Regression approximations for transport model constraint sets in combined simulation-optimization studies, Water Resour. Res., 22(4), 581-586, 1986.

3
Andricevic, R., and P.K. Kitanidis, Optimization of the pumping schedule in aquifer remediation under uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 26(5), 875-885, 1990.

4
Andricevic, R., Coupled withdrawal and sampling designs for groundwater supply models, Water Resour. Res., 29(1), 5-16, 1993.

5
Bredehoeft, J.D., E.G. Reichard, and S.M. Gorelick, If it works, don't fix it: Benefits from regional ground-water management, in: Proceedings of the Assessment of Models for Groundwater Resources Analysis and Management Conference, sponsored by University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, March, 1994.

6
Bryson, A.E., and Y.-C. Ho, Applied optimal control: Optimization, estimation, and control, 481 pp., Hemisphere Publishing, Washington, D.C., 1975.

7
Chan, N., Robustness of the multiple realization method for stochastic hydraulic aquifer management, Water Resour. Res., 29(9), 3159-3167, 1993.

8
Chan, N., Partial infeasibility method for chance-constrained aquifer management, ASCE J. Water Resour. Plan. and Manag., 120(1), 70-89, 1994.

9
Chang, L-C., C.A. Shoemaker, and P. L-F. Liu, Optimal time-varying pumping rates for groundwater remediation: Application of a constrained optimal control algorithm, Water Resour. Res., 28(12), 3157-3173, 1992.

10
Chau, T.S., Optimal management of relief wells near Waterton reservoir, Water Resources Bulletin, 28(2), 349-360, 1992.

11
Culver, T.B., and C.A. Shoemaker, Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods, Water Resour. Res., 28(3), 629-641, 1992.

12
Culver, T.B., and C.A. Shoemaker, Optimal control for groundwater remediation by differential dynamic programming with quasi-newton approximations, Water Resour. Res., 29(4), 823-831, 1993.

13
Danskin, W.R., and J.R. Freckleton, Ground-water-flow modeling and optimization techniques applied to high ground-water problems in San Bernardino, California, in Selected papers in the hydrologic sciences, S. Subitzky (ed.), U.S. Geol. Sur. Water-Supply Paper 2340, 165-177, 1992.

14
Dougherty, D.E., and R.A. Marryott, Optimal groundwater management 1. Simulated Annealing, Water Resour. Res., 27(10), 2493-2508, 1991.

15
Finney, B.A., Samsuhadi, and R. Willis, Quasi three-dimensional optimization model of Jakarta basin, ASCE J. Water Resour. Plan. and Manag., 118(1), 18-31, 1992.

16
Gailey, R.M., and S. M. Gorelick, Design of optimal, reliable plume capture schemes: Application to the Gloucester landfill ground-water contamination problem, Ground Water, 31(1), 107-114, 1993.

17
Gharbi, A, and R.C. Peralta, Integrated embedding optimization applied to Salt Lake valley aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 30(3), 817-832, 1994.

18
Georgakakos, A.P. and D.A. Vlatsa, Stochastic control of ground water systems, Water Resour. Res., 27(8), 2077-2090, 1991.

19
Goldberg, D.E., Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, 412 pp., Addison-Wesley, New York, 1989. Gorelick, S.M., A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods, Water Resour. Res., 19(2), 305-319, 1983.

20
Gorelick, S.M., Sensitivity analysis of optimal groundwater contaminant capture curves: spatial variability and robust solutions, in: Proceedings of the Solving Ground Water Problems with Models Conference, National Water Well Association, Denver, CO, 1987.

21
Gorelick, S.M., Large scale nonlinear deterministic and stochastic optimization: Formulations involving simulation of subsurface contamination, Mathematical Programming, 48, 19-39, 1990.

22
Haggerty, R., and S.M. Gorelick, Design of multiple contaminant remediation: Sensitivity to rate-limited mass transfer, Water Resour. Res., 30(2), 435-446, 1994.

23
Harvey, C.F., R. Haggerty, and S.M. Gorelick, Aquifer remediation: A method for estimating mass transfer rate coefficients and an evaluation of pulsed pumping, Water Resour. Res., 30(7), 1979-1991, 1994.

24
Jones, L., Adaptive control of ground-water hydraulics, ASCE J. Water Resour. Plan, and Manag., 118(1), 1-17, 1992.

25
Karatzas, G.P., and G.F. Pinder, Groundwater management using numerical simulation and the outer approximation method for global optimization, Water Resour. Res., 29(10), 3371-3378, 1993.

26
Lall, U. and Y.W.H. Lin, A groundwater management model for Salt Lake County, Utah with some water rights and water quality considerations, J. of Hydrol., 123, 367-393, 1991.

27
Lee, S-L., and P.K. Kitanidis, Optimal estimation and scheduling in aquifer remediation with incomplete information, Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 2203-2217, 1991.

28
Marryott, R.A., D.E. Dougherty, and R.L.Stollar, Optimal groundwater management 2. Application of simulated annealing to a field-scale contamination site, Water Resour. Res., 29(4), 847-860, 1993.

29
McKinney, D.C., G.B. Gates, and M-D. Lin, Groundwater resource management models: A comparison of genetic algorithms and nonlinear programming, in Numerical Methods in Water Resources, A. Peters et al. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.

30
McKinney, D.C., and M-D. Lin, Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models, Water Resour. Res., 30(6), 1897-1906, 1994.

31
McKinney, D.C., and M-D. Lin, Design methodology for efficient aquifer remediation using pump and treat systems, in Mathematical Modeling in Water Resources, T. Russell et al. (eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, London, 695-702, 1992.

32
Morgan, D.R., J.W. Eheart, and A. J. Valocchi, Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chance constrained programming technique, Water Resour. Res., 29(3), 551-561, 1993.

33
Ranjithan, S, J.W. Eheart, and J.H. Garrett, Jr., Neural net work-based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 29(3), 563-574, 1993.

34
Rogers, L.L., and F.U. Dowla, Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling, Water Resour. Res., 30(2), 457-481, 1994.

35
Simpson, P.K., Artificial Neural Systems: Foundations, Paradigms, Applications, and Implementations, 209 pp., Pergamon, New York, 1990.

36
Tiedeman, C., and S.M. Gorelick, 1993, Analysis of uncertainty in optimal groundwater contaminant capture design, Water Resour. Res., 29(7), 2139-2153.

37
Tucciarelli, T., and G. Pinder, Optimal data acquisition strategy for the development of a transport model for groundwater remediation, Water Resour. Res., 27(4), 577-588, 1991.

38
Tung, Y., Groundwater management by chance-constrained model, ASCE J. Water Resour. Plan. and Manag., 112(1), 1-19, 1986.

39
Varljen, M.D., and J.M. Shafer, Coupled simulation-optimization modeling for municipal ground-water supply protection, Ground Water, 31(3), 401-409, 1993.

40
Wagner, B.J. and S.M. Gorelick, Optimal groundwater quality management under uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 23(7), 1162-1174, 1987.

41
Wagner, B.J. and S.M. Gorelick, Reliable aquifer remediation in the presence of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity: From data to design, Water Resour. Res., 25(10), 1989.

42
Wagner, J.M., U.Shamir, and H.R. Nemati, Groundwater quality management under uncertainty: Stochastic programming approaches and the value of information, Water Resour. Res., 28(5), 1233-1246, 1992.

43
Wang, W., and D.P. Ahlfeld, Optimal groundwater remediation with well location as a decision variable: Model development, Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1605-1618, 1994.

44
Whiffen, G.J., and C.A. Shoemaker, Nonlinear weighted feedback control of groundwater remediation under uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 29(9), 3277-3289, 1993.

45
Yeh, W.W-G., Systems analysis in ground-water planning and management, ASCE J. Water Resour. Plan. and Manag., 118(3), 224-237, 1992.


U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union