USAA-IPCC Calls for Experts

The U.S. Academic Alliance for the IPCC, hosted by AGU, facilitates nominations for IPCC workshops and panels.

Through 26 June 2026: Register to be a Second Order Draft reviewer.

Overview

Established in March 2025, the US Academic Alliance for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (USAA-IPCC) is a network of U.S. universities and colleges that are registered observers with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). AGU is hosting the USAA-IPCC network.

The founding members are College of the Atlantic, Colby College, Dickinson College, Indiana University, Princeton University, Rutgers University, University of California-San Diego, Washington University in St. Louis, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute and Yale University.

As IPCC Observers, the USAA-IPCC members are able to submit nominations in response to IPCC calls for expert nominations. USAA-IPCC aims to increase awareness of authorship calls and expand nomination opportunities for experts in climate research and practice. In April 2025, USAA-IPCC members submitted 284 author nominations to the IPCC in order to ensure sustained U.S. expert engagement in the IPCC’s Seventh Assessment Report.

The USAA-IPCC facilitates calls for nominations and hosts workshops about participating in the IPCC process.

Update 20 May 2026: The USAA-IPCC is encouraging climate experts to register as reviewers of the Second Order Draft (SOD) of the IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Cities. Reviewers must register by 26 June 2026; review deadline is 3 July 2026. Click here to register or scroll to Calls for Experts on this page for more information, including a webinar on this process.

Statement on U.S. Withdrawal from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by the U.S. Academic Alliance for the IPCC (8 January 2026)

This week's announcement that the Trump Administration intends to withdraw the U.S. from participation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), along with a host of other global intergovernmental organizations, is disappointing but not surprising.

The U.S. Academic Alliance for the IPCC (USAA-IPCC) was formed in March 2025 in part to prepare for this possibility and to ensure that U.S. scientists remain able to engage in IPCC work regardless of the status and role of the U.S. government. With the support of the USAA-IPCC, more than 70 U.S. citizens and U.S.-based experts who are currently serving the IPCC as coordinating lead authors, lead authors, review editors and committee members will continue to play these roles.

“U.S. climate scientists have made incredible contributions to understanding our planet’s life support systems and the impacts and risks of climate change. Their role as key players in IPCC reports have helped the U.S. maintain our preeminent position in science and technology, and this global scientific cooperation will continue despite this unfortunate decision,” said Dr. Pamela McElwee, Professor of Human Ecology at Rutgers University, who serves as chair of the Alliance.

“There is a reason we call our community the global scientific enterprise. We cannot grow, innovate, or advance unless we are linked together sharing, analyzing, and deliberating on vital climate data through critical international organizations like the IPCC. In the wake of this devastating move, AGU pledges to do all it can to bridge global partnership, research, and dialogue,” said Dr. Brandon Jones, AGU President, which hosts the alliance.

The Trump Administration began disengaging from IPCC prior to yesterday’s formal announcement. Since February of 2025, the U.S. State Department has not nominated experts for involvement in IPCC work, nor supported travel to IPCC meetings for selected authors, a role they have played in all prior administrations. The U.S. government also did not participate in either of the IPCC business sessions in 2025, the first time the U.S. has not been in attendance since the IPCC’s founding in 1988.

As a result, the USAA-IPCC has assumed a key leadership role in nominating U.S. scientists for consideration as authors for IPCC reports, including for the Seventh Assessment Report (nominating 282 authors in April 2025) and the Methodology Report on Carbon Dioxide Removal Technologies, Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (nominating 33 authors in December 2025), as well as for roles on the IPCC Task Group on Data Support and for participation in several expert workshops. AGU and the USAA-IPCC have also raised funds to support travel for U.S. scientists and technical experts selected by IPCC to attend author meetings and workshops.

Since the founding of the IPCC over four decades ago, U.S. scientists and other experts have made critical contributions, leading formal processes as Working Group co-chairs as well as filling vitally important author and reviewer roles. IPCC findings have shaped science-based policy at all levels—from global climate agreements to local resilience plans—and strengthen the ability of policy communities to make informed decisions. Ensuring US scientists remain fully engaged in the IPCC and the global climate science community will lead to important new research opportunities and international collaborations that benefit the US in substantial ways. The USAA-IPCC looks forward to continuing our support of US climate experts, climate science research, and the IPCC.

For media inquiries, contact [email protected] or [email protected]

Call for Experts

Registration deadline for this call is 26 June 2026.

The Second Order Draft (SOD) of the IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Cities (SRCities) is now available for expert review until 3 July 2026 (midnight GMT+1). Note that you must register to be a reviewer before 26 June 2026.

The Government and Expert Review of the Special Report on Climate Change and Cities SOD is a key element of the IPCC assessment process. The purpose of this review is to help ensure that the report provides a balanced and comprehensive assessment of the latest scientific findings. The IPCC Procedures state that the review process should be objective, open and transparent, with a wide circulation that aims to involve as many independent experts as possible in the IPCC process, seeking a range of views, expertise, and geographical representation.

All experts with relevant expertise may register to serve as an Expert Reviewer to comment on the accuracy and completeness of the scientific/technical/socio-economic content of the drafts according to their own knowledge and experience.

Review comments should focus on substantive issues. For more information on the IPCC review process and what makes a good comment, please watch the webinar in the How to be a Reviewer section below.

Reviewers should keep the following key points in mind:

  • All materials, including draft chapters and comments, are strictly confidential. They must not be distributed, cited, quoted, or shared in any form outside the review process.
  • All comments, including expert reviewer names and affiliations, will be made publicly available after the report has been accepted by the Panel and finalized in accordance with IPCC procedures.
  • Draft materials must not be uploaded to any AI tools or equivalent platforms for analysis, translation, or content processing, as this would breach confidentiality obligations.
  • The role is voluntary, and successful registration does not imply endorsement by the IPCC or convey authorship of its reports. Hence, any reference to your involvement, on social media or otherwise, should accurately reflect the advisory nature of the role and avoid presenting it as a formal position with the IPCC.

If you have any questions about the process, please contact the IPCC Working Group II Technical Support Unit at [email protected].

How to be a Reviewer for IPCC Reports

Learn how to support the research of global climate scientists by becoming a reviewer for the upcoming Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. The review process is critical in preparing IPCC reports, as it helps ensure scientific rigor, the widest range of perspectives, and relevance to the urgent challenges urban areas and communities face in a warming world and changing climate. On 15 October 2025, USAA-IPCC held a free webinar on the role and responsibilities of reviewers for the upcoming IPCC report. Watch the recording.

USAA-IPCC Steering Committee Members

  • Pamela McElwee, Professor of Human Ecology, Rutgers University (Chair)
  • Greg Drozd, Associate Professor of Chemistry, Colby College
  • Robert Kopp, Distinguished Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University
  • Neil Leary, Associate Provost and Director, Center for Sustainability Education, Dickinson College
  • Meenakshi Wadhwa, Director, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and Vice Chancellor for Marine Sciences and Dean of the School of Marine Sciences, University of California-San Diego
  • Beth Martin, Teaching Professor in Environmental Studies, Washington University in St. Louis
  • Jessica O’Reilly, Associate Professor of International Studies, Indiana University
  • Michael Oppenheimer, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Geosciences and International Affairs and the High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University
  • Kilaparti Ramakrishna, Director of Marine Policy Center and Senior Advisor to the President on Ocean and Climate Policy, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  • Stacy-Ann Robinson, Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University
  • Mark Shimamoto, Vice President for Global Outreach and Partnerships, AGU
  • Doreen Stabinsky, Professor, Global Environmental Politics, College of the Atlantic
  • Julie Zimmerman, Vice Provost for Planetary Solutions, Professor of Green Engineering, Deputy Director for Research at Center for Green Chemistry and Green Engineering, Yale University
Contact Us

Contact Razmila Razaak, AGU Program Coordinator for Global Outreach, with questions.