Icebergs in water

CRYOSPHERE EARLY CAREER AWARD COMMITTEE

Committee members

Name

Institution

Committee Role

Ellyn Enderlin  Boise State University   Committee Chair 

Waleed Abdalati

University of Colorado Boulder

Member              
Helene Seroussi Dartmouth College 

Member

Brooke Medley  NASA 

Member

Nathan Kurtz  NASA  Member 
Eli Deeb  US Cold Regions Research & Engineering Lab
Member 
Rosa Maymi

AGU

Staff Partner; Director, Engagement, and Membership

Brendon Kim

AGU

Staff Partner; Program Coordinator, Section Awards and Lectures


Committee Charge

The committee is charged with selecting the recipients of the Cryosphere Early Career Award. Committee members will abide by AGU’s Honors Conflict of Interest Policy, program policies, procedures and guidelines set by AGU. In partnership with the Honors and Recognition Committee and staff, the committee works to ensure that the program is superior in all respects, recognizes all constituents, and fosters a global network of individuals in the Earth and space sciences who epitomize excellence and cooperation in research, education, and outreach. The members of the Cryosphere Early Career Award Committee will promote excellence and transparency, allowing broad input and recognition beyond disciplinary awards, promoting diversity and equity so that the award is sufficiently representative of underrepresented groups.

Glacier spilling out of a volcanic caldera somewhere in British Columbia

Key Duties

The Cryosphere Early Career Award Committee supports the following initiatives and duties and serves a two-year term. Their work is completed primarily through the online submission and review system, and by teleconference and email.

  • 1
    Examine and report on program data to determine whether the number and quality of award nominations is competitive
  • 2
    Review data from award selection processes for the past years to determine if the program is achieving AGU’s relevant goals
  • 3
    Select the Cryosphere Early Career Award recipients
  • 4
    Recommend, implement, and evaluate strategies used to increase diversity of nominations
  • 5
    Participate in training, orientations, and workshops on associated Honors and Recognition policies and processes
  • 6
    Understand and commit to AGU’s Conflict of Interest policy and process
  • 7
    Provide input and recommendations to the Honors and Recognition Committee on program improvements
  • 8
    Partner with AGU leaders and staff, as well as other societies to resolve common issues among scientific communities’ recognition programs